Integral eco-emotions and non-market environmental valuation: An affective-based framework

Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia and Halkos, George (2026): Integral eco-emotions and non-market environmental valuation: An affective-based framework.

Abstract

Non-market environmental valuation studies have incorporated and empirically examined a structured set of cognitive determinants underlying individual preferences, yet the role of affective responses remains theoretically underdeveloped. Literature suggests that incidental emotions, or mood states unrelated to the ecosystem being valued, have no significant effect on stated preferences, a null result further corroborated by ambient weather as an additional incidental trigger. Drawing on the integral/incidental distinction from the decision-making literature, we argue that this null result constitutes a boundary condition and not a general decision on the role of affect in valuation. We propose an Affective Framework, organizing eco-emotions by motivational orientation (approach versus avoidance) and semantic origin (integral versus incidental). Approach-oriented positive eco-emotions, including awe, hope, connectedness to nature, and perceived restorativeness, are predicted to amplify stated preferences. Approach-oriented negative eco-emotions, such as eco-worry, moral guilt, solastalgia, and anticipated regret, activate environmental concern and elevate willingness to pay. Avoidance-oriented eco-emotions, notably clinical eco-anxiety, despair, and eco-paralysis, suppress stated preferences by reducing perceived self-efficacy. Three mechanisms ground these predicted effects: the risk-as-feelings hypothesis, the affect heuristic, and feelings as information theory. The proposed framework offers a theoretically coherent explanation for a previously unexplained method effect in stated preference research and informs future empirical investigation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Eco-emotions; non-market valuation; stated preferences; willingness to pay; integral affect; affect heuristic; eco-anxiety.
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I20 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I30 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects

References

1. Albrecht, G., Sartore, G.-M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., ... & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15(Suppl 1), S95–S98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560701701288

2. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

3. Bleichrodt, H., Wakker, P.P. (2015). Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives, The Economic Journal, Volume 125(583), 493–532, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12200

4. Brown, T. C., & Gregory, R. (1999). Why the WTA–WTP disparity matters. Ecological Economics, 28(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00050-0

5. Bousinakis, B. & Halkos, G. (2021). Creativity as the hidden development factor for organizations and employees. Economic Analysis and Policy 71, 645-659.

6. Cai, X., Feng, D., Li, J., Zhang, C., Chang, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, H., Peng, Y., Lai, W., Yu, L., & Gao, M. (2026). Perceived Restorative Environments and Visitor Well-Being in Urban Wetland Parks: The Mediating Roles of Environmental Preference and Place Attachment. Buildings, 16(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020277

7. Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020). Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434

8. Gkargkavouzi, A., & Halkos, G. (2025). The psychology of non-market environmental valuation: An integrative review of research evidence, theoretical insights, and policy considerations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101, 102510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102510

9. Hanley, N., Czajkowski, M., Hanley-Nickolls, R., & Redpath, S. (2017). Sad or happy? The effects of emotions on stated preferences for environmental goods. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(4), 821–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0048-9

10. Hogg, T. L., Stanley, S. K., O'Brien, L. V., Wilson, M. S., & Watsford, C. R. (2021). The Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102391

11. Innocenti, M., Santarelli, G., Lombardi, G. S., Ciabini, L., Zjalic, D., Di Russo, M., & Cadeddu, C. (2023). How Can Climate Change Anxiety Induce Both Pro-Environmental Behaviours and Eco-Paralysis? The Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3085. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043085

12. Jäger, A. K., & Hine, D. W. (2025). From detached to alarmed: How eco-emotion profiles predict concern and sacrifice for the planet. PloS one, 20(6), e0325916. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325916

13. Johnsen, S. Å. K. (2013). Exploring the use of nature for emotion regulation: Associations with personality, perceived stress, and restorative outcomes. Nordic Psychology, 65(4), 306–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2013. 851445

14. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

15. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297

16. Kerse, Y., & Kerse, G. (2025). The effect of eco-anxiety on pro-environmental behaviors and mental well-being: a parallel mediation model. BMC psychology, 13(1), 1155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03501-6

17. Kühner, C., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2024). Reciprocal Relations Between Climate Change Anxiety and Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 56(5-6), 408-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/001 39165241297050

18. Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799–823. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

19. Liebe, U., Preisendörfer, P., & Meyerhoff, J. (2011). To pay or not to pay: Competing theories to explain individuals' willingness to pay for public environmental goods. Environment and Behavior, 43(1), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509346229

20. Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American Economic Review, 90(2), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.2. 426

21. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-2909.127.2.267

22. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). Oxford University Press.

23. Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92(368), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232669

24. Luís, S., Loureiro, A., Soro, J. C., Possidónio, C., Sampaio, F., & Gaspar, R. (2025). Turning eco-anxiety into pro-environmental behaviour: risk perception as mediator. Journal of Risk Research, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 66987 7.2025.2603986

25. Mackay, C. M. L., & Schmitt, M. T. (2019). Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101323

26. Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., Lorenzo-Arribas, A., & Warber, S. L. (2016). Does perceived restorativeness mediate the effects of perceived biodiversity and perceived naturalness on emotional well-being following group walks in nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2016.04.008

27. Mathers-Jones, J., & Todd, J. (2023). Ecological anxiety and pro-environmental behaviour: The role of attention. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 98, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JANXDIS.2023.102745

28. Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp. 2004.10.001

29. Miola, L., Cellini, N., Bellini, S., & Pazzaglia, F. (2026). Beyond nature: Investigating the restorative properties of environments through the comparison of historical, modern urban, and natural image exposures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 110, 102920. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP. 2026.102920

30. Mirandi, M., Ghizzoni, G., Garofalo, C., Delvecchio, E., Rettori, G., Clayton, S., & Mazzeschi, C. (2025). Development and Validation of the Climate Change Anxiety Scale-Short Form. Clinical neuropsychiatry, 22(6), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250604

31. Muffato, V., Miola, L., Soltantouyeh, A., Pazzaglia, F., & Meneghetti, C. (2025). Walking to the urban green: Increases in positive emotions and perceived restorativeness, but not mental representation ability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 106, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP. 2025.102734

32. Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018776019

33. Notaro, S., & Grilli, G. (2022). How much fear? Exploring the role of integral emotions on stated preferences for wildlife conservation. Environmental Management, 69, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01593-z

34. Notaro, S., & Grilli, G. (2023). The influence of ambient weather conditions on stated preferences for ecosystem services management. Environmental Management, 72, 1228–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01839-4

35. Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L., ... & Karasu, M. (2022). Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action: Correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887

36. Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: The importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157

37. Onwezen, M. C., Antonides, G., & Bartels, J. (2013). The Norm Activation Model: An exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005

38. Pavani, J.-B., Nicolas, L., & Bonetto, E. (2023). Eco-Anxiety motivates pro-environmental behaviors: a Two-Wave Longitudinal Study. Motivation and Emotion, 47(6), 1062–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10038-x

39. Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000018

40. Pihkala, P. (2022a). Toward a taxonomy of climate emotions. Frontiers in Climate, 3, 738154. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.738154

41. Pihkala, P. (2022b). The Process of Eco-Anxiety and Ecological Grief: A Narrative Review and a New Proposal. Sustainability, 14(24), 16628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416628

42. Pleeging, E., van Exel, J., Burger, M. J., & Stavropoulos, S. (2021). Hope for the future and willingness to pay for sustainable energy. Ecological Economics, 181, 106900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106900

43. Plutchik, R. (2001). The nature of emotions. American Scientist, 89, 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1511/2001.28.344

44. Probst, B. M., Burger, S., Arzberger, S., Annighöfer, P., Suda, M., & Egerer, M. (2026). Restoration outcome, perceived environmental quality, and greenspace characteristics: A path analysis of human-nature interaction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 119, 129370. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.UFUG. 2026.129370

45. Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/ 9781446249215.n15

46. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177, 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006

47. Spano, G., Ricciardi, E., Theodorou, A., Giannico, V., Caffò, A. O., Bosco, A., Sanesi, G., & Panno, A. (2023). Objective greenness, connectedness to nature and sunlight levels towards perceived restorativeness in urban nature. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 18192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45604-3

48. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her62/62sternetal.pdf

49. Taufik, D. and Venhoeven, L. (2018). Emotions and Pro-Environmental Behaviour. In Environmental Psychology (eds L. Steg and J.I.M. Groot). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch19

50. van Valkengoed, A., & Steg, L. (2019). The psychology of climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/97811085954 38

51. Verplanken, B., Marks, E., & Dobromir, A. I. (2020). On the nature of eco-anxiety: How constructive or unconstructive is habitual worry about global warming? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101528

52. Voşki, A., Wong-Parodi, G., & Ardoin, N. M. (2023). A new planetary affective science framework for eco-emotions: Findings on eco-anger, eco-grief, and eco-anxiety. Global Environmental Psychology, 1, Article e11465. https://doi.org/10.5964/gep.11465

53. Xu, Y., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Lades, L., Noussair, C. N., & Tucker, S. (2025). The effects of emotions on stated preferences for environmental change: A re-examination. Ecological Economics, 238, 108720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108720