Innovation Policy and AI-Enabled Transformation

Robert, Marc (2026): Innovation Policy and AI-Enabled Transformation.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence has moved from a specialist computational field into a general organisational, industrial and political question. It reshapes production, coordination, learning, and competition, while also unsettling the conceptual boundaries that have long separated innovation policy from business model analysis. This chapter argues that AI-enabled transformation should be understood through a combined lens that links mission-oriented innovation policy, dynamic capabilities, and business model change. The key claim is straightforward. AI does not matter only because it automates tasks or improves prediction. It matters because it reorganises how firms sense opportunities, create and distribute value, capture returns, and position themselves within wider ecosystems. At the same time, it reopens a foundational policy question about direction. If AI is treated as a neutral productivity tool, policy remains trapped within a narrow market-failure logic. If AI is treated as an infrastructural and strategic technology, policy must confront the harder issues of purpose, capability, coordination, and public value. Building on the arguments of mission-oriented innovation policy and the literature on digital transformation of business models, this chapter develops a critical review of how AI changes firms and how policy should respond. It argues for a framework in which public institutions shape directions of change, crowd in experimentation, discipline concentration, and build the collective capabilities required for broad-based adoption. The chapter concludes that effective AI transformation depends less on diffusion alone and more on the alignment between public missions, organisational capabilities, business model redesign, and democratic governance.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: artificial intelligence, innovation policy, mission-oriented policy, dynamic capabilities, business models, digital transformation, ecosystems, public value
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy

References

Abell, D. F. (1980). Defining the business: The starting point of strategic planning. Prentice-Hall. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 197-236). University of Chicago Press. Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., & Jones, C. I. (2019). Artificial intelligence and economic growth. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 237-282). University of Chicago Press. Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 493-520. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609-626). Princeton University Press. Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business models and technological innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 419-426. Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V. (2013). Business models: A challenging agenda. Strategic Organization, 11(4), 418-427. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195-215. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 354-363. Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. (2019). The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation: An exploratory analysis. In A. Agrawal, J. Gans, & A. Goldfarb (Eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda (pp. 115-148). University of Chicago Press. Day, G. S., & Moorman, C. (2010). Strategy from the outside in: Profiting from customer value. McGraw-Hill. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 227-246. Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: Rationales, lessons and challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497-512. Foray, D., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2012). Public R&D and social challenges: What lessons from mission R&D programs? Research Policy, 41(10), 1697-1702. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276. Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper Series, IIPP WP 2018-05. Li, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92-93, Article 102012. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press. O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. Shepherd, D. A., & Majchrzak, A. (2022). Machines augmenting entrepreneurs: Opportunities (and threats) at the Nexus of artificial intelligence and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(4), 106227. Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92–121. Šmaguc, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence in the service of entrepreneurial finance: Knowledge structure and the foundational algorithmic paradigm. Xu, T., & Hu, Y. (2024). Towards sustainable prosperity? Policy evaluation of Jiangsu advanced manufacturing clusters. Technology in Society, 77, 102583. Wach, K., Duong, C. D., Ejdys, J., Kazlauskaitė, R., Korzynski, P., Mazurek, G., ... & Ziemba, E. (2023). The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: A critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(2), 7-30. Wiklund, J. (2026). Working in bed—A commentary on Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Xu, T. L., & Liu, L. (2025). Endogenous Innovation in the Tech Cold War Era. MPRA Paper 126220. Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479–500. Petit, N., & Teece, D. J. (2021). Innovating Big Tech firms and competition policy: Favoring dynamic over static competition. Industrial and Corporate Change, 30(5), 1168-1198. Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194. Teece, D. J. (2017). Towards a capability theory of the firm: Implications for management and policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(3), 693-720. Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 40-49. Visnjic, I., Wiengarten, F., & Neely, A. (2016). Only the brave: Product innovation, service business model innovation, and their impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 36-52. Weber, K. M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive failures framework. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042. Acemoglu, D., Autor, D., & Johnson, S. (2026). Building Pro-Worker Artificial Intelligence. NBER Working Paper No. 34854. National Bureau of Economic Research. Acemoglu, D., Kong, D., & Ozdaglar, A. (2026). AI, Human Cognition and Knowledge Collapse. NBER Working Paper No. 34910. National Bureau of Economic Research. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work. NBER Working Paper No. 24196. National Bureau of Economic Research. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2024). Tasks At Work: Comparative Advantage, Technology and Labor Demand. NBER Working Paper No. 32872. National Bureau of Economic Research. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2026). Automation and Rent Dissipation: Implications for Wages, Inequality, and Productivity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, qjag006. Agrawal, A. K., McHale, J., & Oettl, A. (2026). AI in Science. NBER Working Paper No. 34953. National Bureau of Economic Research. AIhub. (2026). Top AI Ethics and Policy Issues of 2025 and What to Expect in 2026. AIhub. Banking Vision. (2025). 2025: The First Year of AI Regulation in Europe. Banking Vision. Bauer, M., & Pandya, D. (2024). The Brussels Effect, EU Autonomy and the Rise of Global Economic Protectionism. ECIPE. Bernal-Hernández, P., Boni, A., Schot, J., & Velasco, D. (2025). Transformative innovation policy meets responsible research and innovation: a critical reflection. Science and Public Policy, scaf051. Bianchi, C., Galaso, P., & Palomeque, S. (2026). A dynamic view on the Latin American innovation system at continental, national, and local level. Science and Public Policy, 53(1), 17-31. Bick, A., Blandin, A., Deming, D. J., Fuchs-Schündeln, N., & Jessen, J. (2026). Mind the Gap: AI Adoption in Europe and the U.S. NBER Working Paper No. 34995. National Bureau of Economic Research. Bortz, G., Stubrin, L., & Marin, A. (2026). Steering the wheel to deliver what? Innovation, coalitions, and directionality in Latin American biologics. Science and Public Policy, 53(1), 114-130. Boston Consulting Group. (2025). When Companies Struggle to Adopt AI, CEOs Must Step Up. BCG Publications. Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World. Oxford University Press. Cau, R., et al. (2025). Algorithmic bias and data standardization in AI. PMC. Chang, S.-H. (2026). Exploring key licensing technologies and trends of public research institutions through technology patent networks. Science and Public Policy. da Silva, A. P., & Cabral, R. M. (2025). Beyond Copy-Paste: The Brussels Effect and the Evolution of Digital Law in Brazil. Beijing Law Review, 16, 610-642. DTS Conference. (2025). AI-enabled digital transformation has multiple, interacting dark sides. DTS 2026 CFP. Duarte, et al. (2026). Strategic restraint and the refusal to deploy AI. AIhub. Dutrénit, G., Joseph, K. J., Lee, K., & Chaturvedi, S. (2026). Innovation-driven knowledge economies and transformation in the Global South. Science and Public Policy, 53(1), 1-6. Dwivedi, et al. (2023). AI and data-driven decision making in public sector finance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. European Commission. (2024). Regulatory framework on AI. Digital Strategy. Exploding Topics. (2026). AI Adoption in Businesses. National University Blog. Fang, Z., & Hu, H. (2026). Comparing national innovation sustainability: evidence from China and Singapore. Science and Public Policy. Freeman, C. (2026). Coevolution of subsystems of society, innovation systems, and development. Science and Public Policy, 53(1), 7-16. Frontiers in Public Health. (2025). Artificial intelligence in public policy: Digital exclusion and citizen engagement. Frontiers. Gedeon, et al. (2025). Digital trust and misinformation ecosystems. AIhub. Gkritsi, & Haeck. (2025). Systemic risk and technological sovereignty. AIhub. Hancock, & Bailenson. (2024). Verifiable provenance signals and synthetic identity. AIhub. Harari, Y. N. (2024). Institutional and social shaping of large language models. Academy of Management. Harvard Ethics. (2025). AI Governance at a Crossroads: America's AI Action Plan and its Impact on Businesses. Harvard University. Joshi, P., et al. (2026). Conceptualising inclusive in inclusive innovations: evidence from the AI-based MedTech for cancer detection in India. Science and Public Policy, 53(1), 131-144. Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787-801. Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2026). Steering Technological Progress. NBER Working Paper No. 34994. National Bureau of Economic Research. Lundvall, B.-Å., & Rikap, C. (2022). China's catching-up in artificial intelligence seen as a co-evolution of corporate and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 51(1), 104395. Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism. Allen Lane. Mazzucato, M. (2024). A Mission-Oriented Framework for the Economy. Roosevelt Institute. Mazzucato, M. (2025). Mission-Oriented Country Platforms: Engines for a just green transition. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. Mazzucato, M., & Collington, R. (2023). The Big Con: How the Consulting Industry Weakens Our Businesses, Infantilizes Our Governments, and Warps Our Economies. Penguin Press. Mazzucato, M., & Rodrik, D. (2023). Industrial Policy with Conditionalities: A Taxonomy and Sample Cases. UCL IIPP Working Paper. McKinsey & Company. (2026). State of AI Trust in 2026: Shifting to the agentic era. McKinsey Insights. Medsker, L. R. (2026). Top AI Ethics and Policy Issues of 2025 and What to Expect in 2026. AI Matters, 11(2). Microsoft AI Economy Institute. (2026). Global AI Diffusion Report 2025. Microsoft Corporate Responsibility. Nemko. (2024). EU AI Act: Comprehensive legal framework for AI. Nemko Regulations. Newman, et al. (2025). Infrastructure fragility and AWS disruption. AIhub. O'Donnell, & Crownhart. (2025). AI data center energy demand and sustainability. AIhub. Oder, & Béland. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public policy: The disruption of policy analysis. Cambridge University Press. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). How artificial intelligence is accelerating the digital government journey. OECD Publications. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2025. OECD Publishing. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). Submissions invited on artificial intelligence-driven innovation in government. OECD Tax at Hand. PMC. (2025). Critical perspective on implementation barriers and regional context in AI. PubMed Central. Priyadi, U., & Yusuf, A. A. (2024). Digital transformation: Artificial intelligence shaping the future of public sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. Science and Public Policy. (2026). Machinery industry as a digital catalyst: evaluating R&D portfolios and trade-offs using a CGE-based analysis. Oxford Academic. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence [HAI]. (2025). 2025 AI Index Report. Stanford University. Stirling, A. (2024). Responsibility and the hidden politics of directionality: opening up innovation democracies for sustainability transformations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 11(1). Tandfonline. (2026). Lifecycle emissions of AI systems and environmental ethics. Taylor & Francis. Tao, et al. (2024). Cultural bias and the institutional and social shaping of large language models. Academy of Management. Ullern, E. F., de Boer, L., Schmitt, J. C., & Vildåsen, S. S. (2026). Exploring dynamics of circular economy innovation processes. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. U.S. Department of State. (2024). Enterprise Artificial Intelligence Strategy FY 2024-2025: Empowering Diplomacy through Responsible AI. State.gov. Vahdat, & Dean. (2025). Ethics of scale and environmental impact of LLMs. AIhub. Walz, R., et al. (2026). Conditions for a successful latecomer development in green technologies. Science and Public Policy, 53(1), 55-70. White & Case. (2025). AI Watch: Global Regulatory Tracker - European Union. White & Case Insights. World Economic Forum. (2026). Proof over Promise: Insights on Real-World AI Adoption from 2025 MINDS Organizations. Zhang, M. Y., Wang, S., Wei, Y., & Chen, Z. (2026). When science meets geopolitics: global AI research network transformation (2000–2025). Science and Public Policy, scag017. Zhao, Y. (2026). Policy Adaptation within the “Regulatory State”: The Logic of the EU's AI Governance. China Watch, 6(11). Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism and digital exclusion. Frontiers in Public Health.