Financing energy communities: Actors, instruments, builders, and ESG ecosystem expectations in Italy

Koltunov, Maksym and Tricarico, Luca and Bisello, Adriano (2026): Financing energy communities: Actors, instruments, builders, and ESG ecosystem expectations in Italy. Published in: Energy Policy , Vol. 215, No. August 2026 (August 2026): p. 115246.

Abstract

This paper examines the financing of energy communities in Italy, focusing on the roles of key actors, financial instruments, and project builders. It also analyses the economic and ESG impacts that financing actors expect from energy communities. These expectations are shaped by Italy's progressive regulatory framework, which has already supported more than 422 energy communities. We conducted 19 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders involved in financing and building energy communities, supplemented by extensive desk research. Our descriptive analysis identified the financing instruments used by different actors and their recipients both within and beyond the ECs. Thematic analysis highlights the crucial role of municipalities and technical partners in successful project implementation, though municipalities often face significant challenges. Mixed funding, a balanced energy production-consumption ratio, and scalable installations are essential to attract private investment; however, social fund regulations substantially prolong payback periods. Therefore, private actors are primarily driven by indirect economic (e.g., cross-selling, territorial presence) and strategic benefits, while public stakeholders focus on social outcomes. Nonetheless, ECs' potential to address energy poverty is limited by incentive tariff design and modest private-sector engagement. These factors, along with low economic returns, risk undermining ECs viability once subsidies end. The article concludes with stakeholder and policy recommendations aimed at enhancing private investment while advancing the social objectives of energy communities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Energy communities; community energy; Italy; financing; ESG; investment; policy; impact
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions ; Financial Instruments ; Institutional Investors; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L98 - Government Policy

References

Akerlof, G.A., 1970. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84 (3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431 .

Arcudi, C., Bacan, S., Pelotti, P., Tieri, S., 2023. Modelli per promuovere le comunità energetiche: Un ’ opportunità per le Utilities Indice.

ARERA, 2022. TIAD, pp. 1–23.

Arias, A., Husiev, O., Schwaller, C., Sturm, U., 2025. Terminologies and concepts of energy cooperations in Europe: a systematic review of characteristics, potentials, and challenges. Energy Res. Social Sci. 122, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104012 .

Bauwens, T., 2019. Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: findings and policy implications from Flanders. Energy Policy 129, 841–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.067 .

Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., Holstenkamp, L., 2016. What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Res. Social Sci. 13, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 .

Bellotti, P., 2021. Weforgreen Sharing Soc. Coop (Verona—Veneto).

Bere, J., Jones, C., Jones, S., 2015. The Economic and Social Impacts of Small and Community Hydro in Wales, pp. 1–39.

Berka, A.L., Creamer, E., 2018. Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: a review and research agenda. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82 (October 2016), 3400–3419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.050 .

Bhattacherjee, A., 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Textbooks Collection.

Bisello, A., 2020. Assessing multiple benefits of housing regeneration and smart city development: the European project SINFONIA. Sustainability 12 (19), 8038. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198038 .

BloombergNEF, 2024. Lithium-ion battery pack prices see largest drop since 2017, falling to $115 per kilowatt-hour. BloombergNEF from. https://about.bnef.com/insights/commodities/lithium-ion-battery-pack-prices-see-largest-drop-since-2017-falling-to-115-per-kilowatt-hour-bloombergnef/ . (Accessed 11 January 2025).

Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3 (2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa .

Braunholtz-Speight, T., McLachlan, C., Mander, S., Hannon, M., Hardy, J., Cairns, I., Sharmina, M., Manderson, E., 2021. The long term future for community energy in Great Britain: a co-created vision of a thriving sector and steps towards realising it. Energy Res. Social Sci. 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102044 .

Braunholtz-Speight, T., Sharmina, M., Manderson, E., McLachlan, C., Hannon, M., Hardy, J., Mander, S., 2020. Business models and financial characteristics of community energy in the UK. Nat. Energy 5 (2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0546-4 .

Brummer, V., 2018. Community energy – benefits and barriers: a comparative literature review of community energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 94 (June), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.013 .

Cairns, I., Hannon, M., Braunholtz-Speight, T., McLachlan, C., Mander, S., Hardy, J., Sharmina, M., Manderson, E., 2023. Financing grassroots innovation diffusion pathways: the case of UK community energy. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 46, 100679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.11.004 .

Candelise, C., Ruggieri, G., 2017. Community Energy in Italy: Heterogeneous Institutional Characteristics and Citizens Engagement (ISSN 1973-0381 Community).

Castellini, M., D'Alpaos, C., Moretto, M., Pioletti, M., 2025. Paving the way for the widespread activation of renewable energy communities in Italy. Valori e Valutazioni 37. https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20253703 .

CEE, CES, & CEW, 2021. Community Energy. State of the Sector. Community Energy England, Community Energy Scotland, Community Energy Wales, p. 23. https://communityenergyengland.org/files/document/616/1654852180_CommunityEnergyStateoftheSectorUKreport2021.pdf .

Centgraf, S., 2018. Supporting civic engagement in German energy cooperatives – transdisciplinary research based on the reflection of individual needs. Energy Res. Social Sci. 44 (September 2017), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.003 .

Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory: a Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis, second ed. SAGE Publications.

Chiti, S.M., Quatraro, G., 2023. Report di Valutazione d’Impatto.

Cohen, J.J., Azarova, V., Kollmann, A., Reichl, J., 2021. Preferences for community renewable energy investments in Europe. Energy Econ. 100 (105386), 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105386 .

Coopfond, 2022. Bilancio di sostenibilità 2021/2022.

De Simone, E., Rochira, A., Procentese, F., Sportelli, C., Mannarini, T., 2025. Psychological and social factors driving citizen involvement in renewable energy communities: a systematic review. Energy Res. Social Sci. 124, 104067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104067 .

De Vidovich, L., Tricarico, L., Zulianello, M., 2021. Community Energy Map. FrancoAngeli S.R.L.

De Vidovich, L., Tricarico, L., Zulianello, M., 2023. How can we frame energy Communities' Organisational Models? Insights from the Research ‘Community Energy Map’ in the Italian context. Sustainability 15 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031997

Doci, G., Vasileiadou, E., 2015. ‘Let's do it ourselves' individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.051 .

EC, 2023. State Aid SA.106777 (2023/N) – Italy – RRF - Support for the Development of Renewable Energy Communities. Vol. C(2023) 80. European Commission, pp. 1–32.

EFREC, 2014. Handbook on Investment Schemes for REScoop Projects. RESCOOP 20-20-20 Co-funded by the Intelligent Energy Europe Programme of the European Union.

Entwistle, G., Roberts, D., Xu, Y., 2014. Measuring the Local Economic Impact of Community-Owned Energy Projects, pp. 1–52.

Eroe, K., Polci, T., 2022. Comunita Rinnovabili.

Fife, S.T., Gossner, J.D., 2024. Deductive qualitative analysis: evaluating, expanding, and refining theory. Int. J. Qual. Methods 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241244856 .

Franzo, S., Di Lieto, A., Tamanini, A., Cuomo, S., Delle Monache, A., Fumagalli, A., Sanchini, L., Schiavoni, F., 2023. Electricity Market Short Report. Energy & Strategy Group, Politecnico Milano, p. 35. https://www.energystrategy.it/es-download/ .

Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

Gatti, S., 2012. Project Finance in Theory and Practice: Designing, Structuring, and Financing Private and Public Projects. Elsevier/Academic Press.

Grignani, A., Gozzellino, M., Sciullo, A., Padovan, D., 2021. Community cooperative: a new legal form for enhancing social capital for the development of renewable energy communities in Italy. Energies 14 (21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217029 .

GSE, 2024. Regole Operative CER.

GSE, 2025. Mappa interattiva delle cabine primarie. GSE. Retrieved November 11, 2025, from. https://www.gse.it/servizi-per-te/autoconsumo/mappa-interattiva-delle-cabine-primarie .

Hackbarth, A., Lobbe, S., 2020. Attitudes, preferences, and intentions of German households concerning participation in peer-to-peer electricity trading. Energy Policy 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111238 .

Hanke, F., Guyet, R., 2023. The struggle of energy communities to enhance energy justice: insights from 113 German cases. Energy Sustain. Society 13 (1), 16.

Heldeweg, M., Saintier, S., 2020. Renewable energy communities as ‘socio-legal institutions’: a normative frame for energy decentralization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109518 .

Herbes, C., Brummer, V., Rognli, J., Blazejewski, S., Gericke, N., et al., 2017. Responding to policy change: new business models for renewable energy cooperatives – barriers perceived by cooperatives' members. Energy Policy 109, 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.051 .

Hicks, J., Ison, N., 2018. An exploration of the boundaries of ‘community’ in community renewable energy projects: navigating between motivations and context. Energy Policy 113, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.031 .

IEM, 2019. Directive (EU) 2019/944 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending directive 2012/27/EU. Off. J. Eur. Union L 158, 18.

Jalali, M.S., Akhavan, A., 2024. Integrating AI language models in qualitative research: replicating interview data analysis with ChatGPT. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 40 (3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1772 .

Kildegaard, A., Myers-Kuykindall, J., 2006. Community vs. corporate wind: does it matter who develops the wind in Big Stone County, MN?, CVII, pp. 1–32.

Klagge, B., Schmole, H., Seidl, I., Schon, S., 2016. Zukunft der deutschen Energiegenossenschaften. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung ¦ Spatial Res. Plann. 74 (3), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0398-3 .

Koltunov, M., Bisello, A., 2021. Multiple impacts of energy communities: conceptualization taxonomy and assessment examples. In: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178 SIST. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_101 .

Koltunov, M., Cittati, V.-M., Bisello, A., 2022. Institutional and policy context of energy communities in France and Italy: how to increase the welfare-enhancing capacity of the sector. In: Lobbe, S., Sioshansi, F., Robinson, D. (Eds.), Energy Communities, first ed. Academic Press, pp. 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91135-1.00007-9 .

Koltunov, M., 2025a. ENERGY COMMUNITIES: INSTITUTIONS, FINANCING, ECONOMICS (Ph.D Thesis Ed.). Università degli Studi di Trieste. https://arts.units.it/handle/11368/3107017 .

Koltunov, M., 2025b. The economic impact of energy communities on the electricity system and its agents. In: Towards an Effective, Efficient, and Just Energy Transition. EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, pp. 139–172. https://www.openstarts.units.it/handle/10077/37441 .

Koltunov, M., De Vidovich, L., 2025. Energy communities in social sciences: a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 220, 115871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115871 .

Koltunov, M., Beltrami, F., Grossi, L., Blassutigh, N., 2025. The impact of renewable energy communities in the Italian day-ahead electricity market: a scenario analysis. Pre-Print. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.13517 .

Kriukow, J., 2024. The Scholar's Guide to AI-Assisted Thematic Analysis, vols. 1–28.

Lantz, E., Tegen, S., 2011. Economic development impacts of community wind projects: a review and empirical evaluation. Commun. Wind Power Project. April, 81–110.

Lee, V.V., van der Lubbe, S.C.C., Goh, L.H., Valderas, J.M., 2024. Harnessing ChatGPT for thematic analysis: are we ready? J. Med. Internet Res. 26, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.2196/54974 .

Lupi, V., Candelise, C., Calull, M.A., Delvaux, S., Valkering, P., Hubert, W., Sciullo, A., Ivask, N., van der Waal, E., Iturriza, I.J., Paci, D., Della Valle, N., Koukoufikis, G., Dunlop, T., 2021. A characterization of european collective action initiatives and their role as enablers of citizens' participation in the energy transition. Energies 14 (24). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248452 .

Magnani, N., Maretti, M., Salvatore, R., Scotti, I., 2017. Ecopreneurs, rural development and alternative socio-technical arrangements for community renewable energy. J. Rural Stud. 52, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.009 .

MASE, 2023. Decreto M.Amb. n. 414/2023 – Piano nazionale di ripresa e resilienza (PNRR) – M2C2 I.1.2, promozione delle fonti rinnovabili per le comunità energetiche e l’autoconsumo (G.U. 24 gen. 2024).

MASE, 2025. Decreto M.Amb. n. 127/2025 – Modifiche all’incentivo in conto capitale per comunità energetiche del PNRR: Ampliamento ai comuni fino a 50.000 abitanti pubblicato 25 giu. 2025.

Mollick, E., 2014. The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J. Bus. Ventur. 29 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 .

Morgan, D.L., 2023. Exploring the use of artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis: the case of ChatGPT. Int. J. Qual. Methods 22, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248 .

Moroni, S., Tricarico, L., 2018. Distributed energy production in a polycentric scenario: policy reforms and community management. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 61 (11), 1973–1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1379957 .

Musolino, M., Maggio, G., D'Aleo, E., Nicita, A., 2023. Three case studies to explore relevant features of emerging renewable energy communities in Italy. Renew. Energy 210, 540–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.094 .

Noy, C., 2008. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 11 (4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305 .

Nowell, L.S., Norris, J.M., White, D.E., Moules, N.J., 2017. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int. J. Qual. Methods 16 (1), 1609406917733847.

OECD, 2019. Social impact investment 2019. Social Impact Investment 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311299-EN .

Okkonen, L., Lehtonen, O., 2016. Socio-economic impacts of community wind power projects in Northern Scotland. Renew. Energy 85, 826–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.047 .

Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: the Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763 .

Paulus, T.M., Lester, J.N., 2021. Doing Qualitative Research in a Digital World. SAGE Publications.

Phimister, E., Roberts, D., 2012. The role of ownership in determining the rural economic benefits of onshore wind farms. J. Agric. Econ. 63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00336.x .

Poupeau, F.-M., 2020. Everything must Change in Order to Stay as it is. the Impossible Decentralization of the Electricity Sector in France to Cite This Version: HAL Id: Halshs-02477203. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, p. 120.

RED-II, 2018. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Off. J. Eur. Union 2018 (L 328), 82–209.

Regione Piemonte, 2025. Legge regionale 17 dicembre 2025, n. 22: promozione e sostegno delle comunità energetiche rinnovabili e dell’autoconsumo collettivo di energia rinnovabile [Regional law]. Bollettino Ufficiale della Regione Piemonte, Suppl. Ord. n. 4. https://www.regione.piemonte.it/governo/bollettino/abbonati/2025/51/attach/aa_aa_regione%20piemonte%20-%20legge%20regionale_2025-12-17_98438.pdf .

REScoop.eu, 2020. Report on Financial Barriers and Existing Solutions.

REScoop.eu, Ecopower, 2023. Financing Guide for Energy Communities.

Roelich, K., Knoeri, K., 2015. Governing the Infrastructure Commons: Lessons for Community Energy from Common Pool Resource Management. Sustainability Research Institute (SRI), Papers, 87 (ISSN: 1753-1330). https://sri-working-papers.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/67/2019/05/SRIPs-87.pdf .

Schiavo, L.L., Galliani, A., Rossi, A., 2022. 6 - the “virtual” model for collective self-consumption in Italy. In: Loebbe, S., Sioshansi, F., Robinson, D. (Eds.), Energy Communities: Customer-Centered, Market-Driven, Welfare-Enhancing? Academic Press, pp. 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91135-1.00017-1 .

Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper & Brothers.

Sovacool, B.K., 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Social Sci. 13, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020 .

Spence, M., 1973. Job market signaling. Q. J. Econ. 87 (3), 55–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010 .

Suchman, M.C., 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20 (3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 .

Tarpani, E., Piselli, C., Fabiani, C., Pigliautile, I., Kingma, E.J., Pioppi, B., Pisello, A.L., 2022. Energy communities implementation in the European union: case studies from pioneer and laggard countries. Sustainability 14 (19), 12528.

TERNA, 2025. Electricity Consumption Increases by 2.2% in 2024. TERNA. Retrieved from. https://www.terna.it/en/media/press-releases/detail/electricity-consumption-2024?utm_source .

Torgerson, M., 2006. Umatilla County's economic structure and the economic impacts of wind energy development: an input-output analysis. Energy March.

Turobov, A., Coyle, D., Harding, V., 2024. Using ChatGPT for Thematic Analysis. May.

Tricarico, L., 2018. Community energy enterprises in the distributed energy geography: a review of issues and potential approaches. Int. J. Sustain. Energy Plann. Manag. 18, 81–94.

Vernay, A.L., Sebi, C., 2020. Energy communities and their ecosystems: a comparison of France and the Netherlands. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 158, 120123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120123 .

Wirth, S., 2014. Communities matter: institutional preconditions for community renewable energy. Energy Policy 70, 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.021 .

Wolsink, M., 2012. The research agenda on social acceptance of distributed generation in smart grids: renewable as common pool resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16 (1), 822–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.006 .

Yildiz, O., 2014. Financing renewable energy infrastructures via financial citizen participation – the case of Germany. Renew. Energy 68, 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.038 .

Yin, R.K., 1994. Case Study Research Design and Methods: Applied Social Research and Methods Series. Sage Publications.