Redshshaw, Daniel (0015): Digital Land Rent: Trademark Scarcity, AI Production, and the Monetisation of Intangible Signifiers.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_128728.pdf Download (29kB) | Preview |
Abstract
his paper argues that generative AI is reducing the cost of producing marketing assets, names, and symbolic content, shifting competitive advantage away from the production of symbolic artefacts and toward the legal and institutional control points that govern brand identity. It proposes “Digital Land Rent” as a heuristic for the economic returns that may accrue to trademark proprietors when commercially salient signifiers are legally scarce, even if they are linguistically or visually replicable. Using a decoupling framework, the paper analyses an Owner-First model in which trademarks, provenance, and narrative are developed prior to product-market operation and later licensed or transferred to operators. It also examines specification breadth, applicant intent, bad-faith doctrine, and emerging bank practices that incorporate IP valuation into lending decisions. The paper contributes to law-and-economics debates on intangible capital, trademark scope, and valuation under conditions of expanding AI-assisted production.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Digital Land Rent: Trademark Scarcity, AI Production, and the Monetisation of Intangible Signifiers |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Trademark scarcity Trademarks Intellectual property Intangible capital Generative AI Artificial intelligence Brand valuation Trademark valuation Licensing Trademark licensing Law and economics Digital scarcity Brand strategy Intangible assets Economic jurisprudence Bad faith Non-use IP finance Owner-First model Clean Asset Paradox |
| Subjects: | K - Law and Economics > K0 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital |
| Item ID: | 128728 |
| Depositing User: | Mr Daniel Redshaw |
| Date Deposited: | 15 May 2026 14:47 |
| Last Modified: | 15 May 2026 15:48 |
| References: | Aaker, D.A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. Free Press, New York. Apple Inc. v. Proview Technology (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd (2012). Guangdong Higher People's Court, China. Settlement reported June–July 2012. British Business Bank and UK Intellectual Property Office (2018). Using Intellectual Property to Access Growth Funding. British Business Bank, Sheffield. Fig. 4 (EFG default and loss rates). Conner, K.R. (1991). A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics. Journal of Management, 17(1), 121–154. EUIPO (2023). Guidelines for Examination. European Union Intellectual Property Office. [Note on Nice Classification as administrative taxonomy.] Haskel, J. and Westlake, S. (2017). Capitalism Without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton. Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22. Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. (1987). Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective. Journal of Law and Economics, 30(2), 265–309. McKinsey Global Institute (2023). The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier. McKinsey & Company. Mendonca, S., Pereira, T.S. and Godinho, M.M. (2004). Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and Industrial Change. Research Policy, 33(9), 1385–1404. Ministry of Justice (2025). Property (Digital Assets Etc.) Bill: Factsheet. UK Government, 13 May 2025. NatWest Group (2024). NatWest Launches Intellectual Property-Based Lending to Fuel High Growth Businesses. Press Release, January 2024. Property (Digital Assets etc) Act 2025 (c. 29), s 1. His Majesty's Stationery Office, London. Redshaw, D. (2026a). Hidden Brand Gold: The Brand Flipping Blueprint. British Heritage Brands / KDP. Redshaw, D. (2026b). The Trademark Game: He Who Owns the Name Owns the Game. British Heritage Brands / KDP. Redshaw, D. (2026c). BrandLab Whitepaper 2026. British Heritage Brands. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. SkyKick UK Ltd v Sky Ltd [2024] UKSC 36. United Kingdom Supreme Court. Press summary available at supremecourt.uk. Trade Marks Act 1994 (UK), s 2(2) (saving for passing off). WIPO (1957, as revised). Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva. WIPO (2024). World IP Report 2024: Making Innovation Policy Work for Development. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva. WIPO Madrid System (2024). Members and Coverage. worldipr.wipo.int. [132 countries; 80%+ of global trade.] |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/128728 |

