Obregon Diaz, Carlos Federico (2026): Is Economics a Science?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_128760.pdf Download (214kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper analyzes the epistemological status of economics by distinguishing between ideological content, closed formal systems, and scientific cores within economic theory. It introduces a methodological framework (disentangle) to evaluate the scientific validity of different schools of thought. The analysis demonstrates that economic theories become scientific only when they generate refutable hypotheses, engage with empirical data, and are grounded in real institutional and social belonging structures. The Economics of Belonging is presented as an institutional framework capable of integrating valid insights from different traditions while explaining economic development, crises, and inequality through belonging regimes and middle-class formation.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | Is Economics a Science? |
| English Title: | Is Economics a Science? |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | Economics of Belonging Economic methodology Science and ideology Institutional economics Economic epistemology Disentangle method Economic theory Middle class Economic development Global governance Belonging systems Comparative economic systems |
| Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B25 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary ; Austrian B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B50 - General D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
| Item ID: | 128760 |
| Depositing User: | Mr. Carlos Obregón |
| Date Deposited: | 15 May 2026 15:09 |
| Last Modified: | 15 May 2026 15:09 |
| References: | Arendt, H. (1958). La condición humana. Paidós. Derrida, J. (1971). De la gramatología. Siglo XXI. Foucault, M. (1975). Vigilar y castigar: Nacimiento de la prisión. Siglo XXI. Han, B.-C. (2012). La sociedad del cansancio. Herder. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. Keynes, J. M. (1936). Teoría general del empleo, el interés y el dinero. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Kuhn, T. S. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Lakatos, I. (1983). La falsación y la metodología de los programas científicos de investigación. En I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Crítica y desarrollo del conocimiento (pp. 91–196). Grijalbo. North, D. C. (1990). Instituciones, cambio institucional y desempeño económico. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Obregón Díaz, C. F. (1982-2025). Complete Works. Editorial Amazon. ResearchGate y Academia.edu. Polanyi, K. (1944). La gran transformación. La Piqueta. Popper, K. (1959). La lógica de la investigación científica. Tecnos. Putnam, H. (1975). Mente, lenguaje y realidad. Tecnos. Rawls, J. (1971). Teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Sen, A. (1999). Desarrollo y libertad. Planeta. Smith, A. (1776/1999). La riqueza de las naciones. Alianza Editorial. Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Un pequeño empujón. Taurus. Veblen, T. (1899). La teoría de la clase ociosa. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Weber, M. (1978). Economía y sociedad. Fondo de Cultura Económica. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/128760 |

