The Autopoietic Model of Economic Reproduction (AMER)

Leiashvily, Paata (2026): The Autopoietic Model of Economic Reproduction (AMER).

Abstract

Classical general equilibrium theory specifies the conditions under which equilibrium may exist, but offers limited insight into the dynamics of its attainment. This paper addresses that gap by developing a recursive dynamic formulation of the Symmetric Model of General Economic Equilibrium, interpreted here as the Autopoietic Model of Economic Reproduction (AMER). The economy is represented as an operationally closed system in which products and resources recursively reproduce one another through decentralized exchange and feedback. The analysis shows that, once realistic time lags in price transmission between interdependent product and resource markets are introduced, the adjustment process does not converge to equilibrium but generates persistent endogenous oscillations. Explicit analytical conditions for the emergence of such dynamics are derived and linked to behavioral parameters, including the speed of price adjustment, demand inertia, and cyclical changes in the propensity to save and the propensity to expand production. These propensities are themselves influenced by optimistic and pessimistic expectations generated by the cycle. The paper further shows that this mechanism is robust across extensions with money, foreign trade, and multi-level production, thereby shifting the focus of general equilibrium analysis from equilibrium states to the recursive dynamics of decentralized coordination.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: general equilibrium; business cycles; recursive dynamics; endogenous instability; behavioral feedback; market coordination; autopoiesis; matrix models
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C62 - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium; D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D50 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles

References

1. Baecker, D. (2001). Why Systems? Theory, Culture & Society, 18(1), 59–74.

2. Blaug M. (2006) The methodology of economics. Second Edition. Cambridge, New York. Cambridge University Press.

3. Brian A. (2015) Complexity Economics: A Different Framework for Economic Thought,” in Complexity and The Economy, New York, NY. Oxford University Press.

4. Dopfer, K., & Potts, J. (2008). The General Theory of Economic Evolution. London: Routledge.

5. Foerster H. (2003) Understanding Understanding: essays on cybernetics and cognition. Springer-Verlag NY, Inc.

6. Godley W., Lavoie M., (2007) Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth". Second Edition. New York. Palgrave Macmillan.

7. Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional re(turns) and the strategic–relational approach. Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1213-1235.

8. Hegel, G.W.F. (2010) The Science of Logic Cambridge University Press Cambridge

9. Heilbroner, R. (1988) Behind the veil of economics. Essays in the worldly philosophy. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, London.

10. Knyazeva E. (2014) Ennaktivism: a new form of constructivism in epistemology, M.; SPB.: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives; University book. (In Russian).

11. Lavoie M., (2022) Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations. Second Edition. Edward Elgar Publishing.

12. Leiashvily P. (2025) Circular Organization of Economic Processes Symmetric Model of Economic Equilibrium.// Journal of Economics & Management Research. Vol. 6 (10): 1-9.

13. Leiashvily, P. (2023) The Economy as a Complex System of Economic Actions: In Search of a New Paradigm. New York. Nova Science Publishers Inc.

14. Leiashvily, P. (2021) “Macroeconomic Order from Microeconomic Chaos”. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-15.

15. Leiashvily, P. (2017) “The Relativity Theory of General Economic Equilibrium” // American Journal of Economics, 7(5): 216-229.

16. Leiashvily, P. (2015) Self-regulation of Market Economy: Interdisciplinary Analysis. NY. NOVA SCIENCE PUBLISHERS INC.

17. Leiashvily P. (2012) Economic Activity: Teleological Analysis. New York. Nova Science Publishers Inc.

18. Luhmann N. (2013) Introduction to Systems Theory. Cambridge, Polity Press.

19. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

20. Marx, K. 1955 A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy Publishers Moscow. pp. 717, 719-720, Progress

21. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Company.

22. Orléan, A. (2014). The Empire of Value: A New Foundation for Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23. Sraffa, P. 1960 Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

24. Smith, A. (2007). An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. NY, Cosimo, Inc. 79

25. Steedman, I. (1981) Ricardo, Marx, Sraffa. In: I. Steedman, P. Sweezy and others, The Value Controversy. London. Verso Editions and NLB.

26. Strogatz S., (2015) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, 2nd ed., CRC Press. ( p. xiii).

27. Trandafir, R. A. (2017). Autopoiesis and the Evolution of Economic Systems. Journal of Philosophical Economics, XI(1), 5-30.

28. Walras, L. (2014) Elements of Theoretical Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

29. Yatskevich V. (1990) Dialectics of optimal choice. Kyiv, "Scientific Thought". (In Russian).