Motivation Without Hierarchy: Symbolic–Functional Dynamics as a New Conceptual Architecture

Abe Housh, Najm (2026): Motivation Without Hierarchy: Symbolic–Functional Dynamics as a New Conceptual Architecture.

Abstract

This paper develops a non-hierarchical model of motivation as a dynamic evaluative process, challenging traditional hierarchical frameworks such as Maslow’s need theory. Instead of sequential need satisfaction, motivation is conceptualized as the outcome of continuous evaluation across competing alternatives.

The model integrates two co-present dimensions: symbolic value (meaning, identity, recognition) and functional return (utility, feasibility), along with their associated constraints. Behavioral selection emerges from context-dependent weighting of these components, rather than from progression through predefined stages.

Motivational stability and change are explained through differences in net evaluative value across alternatives. Stable behavior arises when one option achieves evaluative dominance, while instability and fluctuation occur when values converge or constraints compress differences.

This framework accounts for phenomena poorly explained by hierarchical models, including persistence under constraint, commitment without direct functional return, and variation within the same need domain. As a conceptual contribution, it provides a foundation for formal modeling, behavioral economics applications, and integration with cognitive and neurocomputational theories of decision-making.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Motivation Decision-Making Non-Hierarchical Model Behavioral Theory Evaluative Model Behavioral Economics Cognitive Evaluation Choice Theory Utility Theory Preference Formation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

References

1 Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review. 2 Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 3 Wahba, M. A., & Bridwell, L. G. (1976). Maslow reconsidered. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 4 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits. Psychological Inquiry. 5 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-Determination Theory. Guilford Press. 6 Sheldon, K. M., et al. (2004). Optimal human being. Psychological Review. 7 Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press. 8 Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of Life. Guilford Press. 9 McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology. 10 Oyserman, D. (2015). Identity-Based Motivation. Oxford University Press. 11 Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self. Psychological Review. 12 Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. 13 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. 14 Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. 15 Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology. 16 Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. 17 Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. 18 Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. 19 Abbott, A. (2001). Time Matters. 20 Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change. 21 Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science. 22 Najm Abe Housh. (2026) . Beyond Hierarchy and Heuristics: A Structural Critique of Motivational, Decision, and Social Influence Models https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18980141