Villines, Gregory (2026): The Industrial Curvature Index A Geometric Framework for Regional Recession Resilience and Adjustment Speed: Evidence from 3,115 U.S. Counties, 2001–2024.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_128975.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
I introduce the Industrial Curvature Index (ICI), a geometric measure of how distinctive a county’s industrial composition is from that of its geographic neighbors. ICI is constructed by representing each county-quarter as a point on the simplex of NAICS supersector employment shares, equipping the simplex with the Fisher–Rao information metric, and computing time-averaged Ollivier–Ricci curvature on the Census-defined county adjacency graph. High ICI corresponds to counties embedded in tightly coupled regional clusters; low ICI to counties whose industrial composition is structurally distinctive from their neighbors’. The principal empirical finding is that ICI is a strong and robust predictor of cross-county heterogeneity in recession-trough employment loss. Across 3,115 retained U.S. counties from 2001 through 2024, a one-standard-deviation increase in ICI corresponds to a 4.86 percentage-point deeper 2008–2009 employment trough (β = −4.86, HC3 p < 0.001, R² = 0.145, Tier A pooled), and a 3.91 percentage-point deeper 2020 trough (β = −3.91, HC3 p < 0.001, R² = 0.129, replication). With full controls for the Herfindahl–Hirschman index of industrial concentration, Shannon entropy of supersector shares, top-three-sector concentration, share Gini, and log-employment, the standardized ICI coefficient remains highly significant (R08 Spec 3: β = −1.91, p < 0.001, R² = 0.392; R20 Spec 3: β = −1.77, p < 0.001, R² = 0.305). The finding survives a comprehensive battery of robustness checks. State fixed effects, eliminating between-state variation entirely, yield β = −1.39 for R08 and β = −0.98 for R20 (both p < 0.001). Out-of-sample temporal identification, in which ICI is constructed using only QCEW data preceding each recession, yields effectively identical magnitudes (β = −4.75 for R08 and β = −3.88 for R20, both p < 0.001), addressing reverse-causality concerns. The relationship is approximately nine times stronger in counties below the median in mean total employment (R² = 0.156) than in those above (R² = 0.017), suggesting that small-county industrial geometry is a substantively important resilience determinant. A secondary and weaker finding is that ICI also predicts unemployment-rate adjustment speed (Tier A pooled β = −0.20, p < 0.001, R² = 0.005), with a sub-period decomposition demonstrating that an apparent anomalous Texas effect dissolves into null sub-period coefficients—a methodological caution against full-sample regressions when underlying dynamics are heterogeneous. Substantively, the paper provides evidence that geometric distinctiveness functions as a portfolio-diversification mechanism at the regional scale: counties whose industrial composition does not co-vary with their neighbors’ are partially insulated from shocks that hit the regional and national average composition. The framework offers a measurement contribution distinct from existing scalar diversification measures—Herfindahl–Hirschman, entropy, top-share concentration, and Gini—which exhibit pairwise correlations exceeding 0.85 among themselves but only 0.33 to 0.39 with ICI.
| Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
|---|---|
| Original Title: | The Industrial Curvature Index A Geometric Framework for Regional Recession Resilience and Adjustment Speed: Evidence from 3,115 U.S. Counties, 2001–2024 |
| Language: | English |
| Keywords: | regional resilience, information geometry, Ollivier–Ricci curvature, Fisher–Rao metric, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, Local Area Unemployment Statistics, regional adjustment dynamics, employment recessions |
| Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J64 - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
| Item ID: | 128975 |
| Depositing User: | Gregory Villines |
| Date Deposited: | 05 Jun 2026 14:48 |
| Last Modified: | 05 Jun 2026 14:48 |
| References: | Amari, S. (2016). Information Geometry and Its Applications. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 194. Springer. Bailey, D., & Turok, I. (2020). Resilience revisited. Regional Studies, 54(8), 1101–1107. Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies? W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, MI. Blanchard, O. J., & Katz, L. F. (1992). Regional evolutions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992(1), 1–75. Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. Boschma, R. (2015). Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023a). Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages: Handbook of Methods. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC. https://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/cew/. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023b). Local Area Unemployment Statistics: Estimation Methodology. U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC. https://www.bls.gov/lau/laumthd.htm. Caticha, A. (2015). The basics of information geometry. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1641, 15–26. Cellini, S. R., Dickert-Conlin, S., Mocan, N. H., Stevens, A., & Strain, M. R. (2019). Local labor markets and unemployment. Journal of Labor Economics, 37(S2), S1–S26. Census Bureau (2023). 2023 Population Estimates Vintage: County and Metropolitan Statistical Area Delineations. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Census Bureau (2024). 2024 County Adjacency File. U.S. Department of Commerce, Geography Division, Washington, DC. https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/. Čencov, N. N. (1982). Statistical Decision Rules and Optimal Inference. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 53. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. Conroy, M. E. (1975). The concept and measurement of regional industrial diversification. Southern Economic Journal, 41(3), 492–505. Davies, S. (2011). Regional resilience in the 2008–2010 downturn: Comparative evidence from European countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 4(3), 369–382. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. Glaeser, E. L., Ponzetto, G. A. M., & Tobio, K. (2014). Cities, skills and regional change. Regional Studies, 48(1), 7–43. Lin, Y., Lu, L., & Yau, S.-T. (2011). Ricci curvature of graphs. Tohoku Mathematical Journal, 63(4), 605–627. Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224. MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305–325. Martin, R. (2012). Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 1–32. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualisation and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(1), 1–42. Martin, R., Sunley, P., Gardiner, B., & Tyler, P. (2016). How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies, 50(4), 561–585. Office of Management and Budget (2023). 2023 Standards for Delineating Core-Based Statistical Areas. OMB Bulletin 23-01, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC. Ollivier, Y. (2009). Ricci curvature of Markov chains on metric spaces. Journal of Functional Analysis, 256(3), 810–864. Owyang, M. T., Piger, J., & Wall, H. J. (2008). A state-level analysis of the Great Moderation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38(6), 578–589. Rao, C. R. (1945). Information and the accuracy attainable in the estimation of statistical parameters. Bulletin of the Calcutta Mathematical Society, 37(3), 81–91. Samal, A., Sreejith, R. P., Gu, J., Liu, S., Saucan, E., & Jost, J. (2018). Comparative analysis of two discretizations of Ricci curvature for complex networks. Scientific Reports, 8, 8650. Sandhu, R. S., Georgiou, T. T., & Tannenbaum, A. R. (2016). Ricci curvature: An economic indicator for market fragility and systemic risk. Science Advances, 2(5), e1501495. Sia, J., Jonckheere, E., & Bogdan, P. (2019). Ollivier-Ricci curvature-based method to community detection in complex networks. Scientific Reports, 9, 9800. Villani, C. (2009). Optimal Transport: Old and New. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 338. Springer. |
| URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/128975 |

