Endogenous Entry and Optimizing Creative Destruction

Lai, Ching-Chong and Lai, Ting-Wei and Yu, Po-yang (2026): Endogenous Entry and Optimizing Creative Destruction.

Abstract

Existing studies on Schumpeterian growth theory unanimously specify new entrants’ creative destruction behavior in an ad hoc manner. However, this specification fails to reflect the fact that the replacement of incumbents by new entrants is essentially an optimal decision-making process. To overcome this deficiency, this paper develops a Schumpeterian growth model in which creative destruction arises endogenously from the optimal decision-making of entrant R&D firms, rather than being imposed in an ad hoc manner. The model is then used to examine how R&D-related policies—including patent protection and corporate profit taxation—as well as entry sunk costs affect entrants’ creative-destruction behavior, economic growth, and social welfare. Our theoretical analysis shows that a higher corporate profit tax rate or a higher marginal entry cost reduces the mass of potential new entrants, the optimal probability of creative destruction, and the balanced growth rate, whereas stronger patent protection raises these macroeconomic variables. In addition, our numerical welfare analysis finds that the magnitude of the marginal market entry cost plays a crucial role in determining the optimal levels of patent protection and corporate profit taxation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: R&D policies, Creative destruction, Economic growth, Social welfare
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

References

Acemoglu, D. and D. Cao, (2015), “Innovation by Entrants and Incumbents,” Journal of Economic Theory 157, 255–294. Acemoglu, D., U. Akcigit, H. Alp, N. Bloom and W. Kerr, (2018), “Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth,” American Economic Review 108, 3450-3491. Aghion, P., U. Akcigit, A. Bergeaud, R. Blundell and D. Hémous, (2019), “Innovation and Top Income Inequality,” Review of Economic Studies 86, 1-45. Aghion, P., U. Akcigit and P. Howitt, (2015), “The Schumpeterian Growth Paradigm,” Annual Review of Economics 7, 557-575. Aghion, P. and P. Howitt, (1992), “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica 60, 323-351. Akcigit, U., D. Hanley and N. Serrano-Velarde, (2021), “Back to Basics: Basic Research Spillovers, Innovation Policy, and Growth,” Review of Economic Studies 88, 1-43. Akcigit, U. and W. Kerr, (2018), “Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations,” Journal of Political Economy 126, 1374–1443. Akcigit, U. and M. Melitz, (2022), “International Trade and Innovation,” In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 5, 377-404, Edited by G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, and K. Rogoff. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Arqué‐Castells, P. and P. Mohnen, (2015), “Sunk Costs, Extensive R&D Subsidies and Permanent Inducement Effects,” Journal of Industrial Economics 63, 458-494. Arrow, K. J. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources to Invention,” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, 609–26, Edited by National Bureau of Economic Research. NJ: Princeton University Press. Barro, R. J. and X. Sala-i-Martin, (2004), Economic Growth, 2nd Edition. Mass., Cambridge: MIT Press. Basu, S. (1996), “Procyclical Productivity: Increasing Returns or Cyclical Utilization?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 719-751. Belleflamme, P. and M Peitz, (2015), Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chu, A. C. and G. Cozzi, (2014), “R&D and Economic Growth in a Cash‐in‐Advance Economy,” International Economic Review 55, 507-524. Chu, A. C. and G. Cozzi, (2018), “Effects of Patents versus R&D Subsidies on Income Inequality,” Review of Economic Dynamics 29, 68-84. Chu, A. C., G. Cozzi, Y. Furukawa and C. H. Liao, (2017), “Inflation and Economic Growth in a Schumpeterian Model with Endogenous Entry of Heterogeneous Firms,” European Economic Review 98, 392-409. Chu, A. C., G. Cozzi, C. C. Lai and C. H. Liao, (2015), “Inflation, R&D and Growth in an Open Economy,” Journal of International Economics 96, 360-374. Chu, A. C. and S. Pan, (2013), “The Escape-Infringement Effect of Blocking Patents on Innovation and Economic Growth,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 17, 955-969. Cozzi, G. (2007), “The Arrow Effect under Competitive R&D,” The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 7, 1-20. Ferraro, D., S. Ghazi and P. F. Peretto, (2020), “Implications of Tax Policy for Innovation and Aggregate Productivity Growth,” European Economic Review 130, 103590. Goh, A. T. and J. Olivier, (2002), “Optimal Patent Protection in a Two‐Sector Economy,” International Economic Review 43, 1191‐1214. Grossman, G. and E. Helpman, (1991), “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth,” Review of Economic Studies 58, 43-61. Grullon, G., Y. Larkin and R. Michaely, (2019), “Are US Industries Becoming More Concentrated?” Review of Finance 23, 697-743. Hall, B. H. (1996), “The Private and Social Returns to Research and Development,” NBER Working Paper R2092. Hall, B. H. and J. Lerner, (2010), “The Financing of R&D and Innovation.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1, 609-639, Edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Hasanzadeh, S. and H. Khan, (2019), “Sources of Canadian Economic Growth,” Canadian Journal of Economics 52, 279-302. Hopenhayn, H. A. (1992), “Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium,” Econometrica 60, 1127-1150. Hu, R., Y. Yang and Z. Zheng, (2021), “Inflation, Endogenous Quality Increment, and Economic Growth,” Mathematical Social Sciences 114, 72-86. Huang, C. Y., J. J. Chang and L. Ji, (2021), “Inflation, Market Structure, and Innovation-driven Growth with Distinct Cash Constraints,” Oxford Economic Papers 73, 1270-1303. Huang, C. Y., Y. Wu, Y. Yang and Z. Zheng, (2023), “Monetary Policy in a Schumpeterian Growth Model with Vertical R&D Sectors,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 55, 1569-1607. Iwaisako, T. (2020), “Welfare Effects of Patent Protection in a Semi-endogenous Growth Model,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 24, 708-728. Iwaisako, T. and K. Futagami, (2013), “Patent Protection, Capital Accumulation, and Economic Growth,” Economic Theory 52, 631-668. Jones, C. I. (1995), “R&D-based Models of Economic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 103, 759-784. Jones, C. I. (2005), “Growth and Idea,.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1B, 1063–1111, Edited by P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Jones, C. I. and J. C. Williams, (1998), “Measuring the Social Return to R&D,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1119-1135. Jones, C. I. and J. C. Williams, (2000), “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D,” Journal of Economic Growth 5, 65-85. Li, C. W. (2001), “On the Policy Implications of Endogenous Technological Progress,” Economic Journal 111, 164–179. Lu, Y. X., C. C. Lai and P. Y. Yu, (2024), “Effects of Patent Policy on Growth and Inequality: Exogenous versus Endogenous Quality Improvements,” Journal of Economics 141, 1-28. Malamud, S. and F. Zucchi, (2019), “Liquidity, Innovation, and Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Financial Economics 132, 519-541. Máñez, J. A., Rochina‐Barrachina, M. E., Sanchis, A. and Sanchis, J. A. (2009), “The Role of Sunk Costs in the Decision to Invest in R&D,” Journal of Industrial Economics 57, 712-735. Melitz, M. J. (2003), “The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity,” Econometrica 71, 1695-1725. Minniti, A., C. P. Parello and P. S. Segerstrom, (2013), “A Schumpeterian Growth Model with Random Quality Improvements,” Economic Theory 52, 755–791. Mukherjee, A., M. Singh, and A. Žaldokas, (2017), “Do Corporate Taxes Hinder Innovation?,” Journal of Financial Economics 124, 195-221. OECD, (2025), Corporate Tax Statistics 2025. Paris: OECD Publishing. Parello, C. P. (2019), “R&D Policy and Competition in a Schumpeterian Growth Model with Heterogeneous Firms,” Oxford Economic Papers 71, 187-202. Peretto, P. (2007), “Corporate Taxes, Growth and Welfare in a Schumpeterian Economy,” Journal of Economic Theory 137, 353-382. Peretto, P. (2011), “The Growth and Welfare Effects of Deficit-Financed Dividend Tax Cuts,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43, 835-869. Rivera-Batiz, L. A. and P. M. Romer, (1991), “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531-555. Scherer, F. M. (1982), “Inter-industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth,” Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 627-634. Segerstrom, P. S. (1998), “Endogenous Growth Without Scale Effects,” American Economic Review 88, 1290-1310. Wright, D. J. (1999), “Optimal Patent Breadth and Length with Costly Imitation,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 17, 419-436. Yang, Y. (2018), “On the Optimality of IPR Protection with Blocking Patents,” Review of Economic Dynamics 27, 205-230. Yu, P.Y. and C. C. Lai, (2025), “Endogenous Innovation Scale and Patent Policy in a Monetary Schumpeterian Growth Model,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 29, Article e26, 1-27.