Value beyond labor time: Production and participation in contemporary political economy

Sekimonyo, Jo M. and Casimir, Tara (2025): Value beyond labor time: Production and participation in contemporary political economy.

Abstract

This paper challenges the contemporary relevance of the Labor Theory of Value (LTV), arguing that labor time no longer provides an adequate metric for value creation in economies structured by automation and digital platforms. As economic activity becomes increasingly mediated by data-driven systems, value depends less on direct labor input and more on the conditions that enable participation in production. To account for this shift, the paper develops a structural framework in which value is modeled as a function of the means of production (Mₚ) and the means of participation (Mπ). While Mₚ captures technological capacity, infrastructure, and data systems, Mπ refers to the institutional, digital, and organizational conditions required to access and engage with these systems, including credentials, connectivity, network position, and algorithmic visibility. Participation in this framework is defined not as activity in general, but as rule-bound engagement within specific systems that structure access to production. By formalizing value as V = f(Mₚ, Mπ), the framework highlights the complementarity between production capacity and participation access. Constraints on participation limit value realization even in the presence of advanced technological systems. Where the Labor Theory of Value relies on socially necessary labor time (SNLT) to measure the quantity of labor required for production, the present framework emphasizes socially necessary participation (SNP) as the condition under which labor becomes economically effective. Within this structure, labor is reinterpreted as a cost-bearing participant that invests in its own participation capacity, thereby blurring the conventional distinction between labor and capital. The analysis extends to surplus allocation through a co-investment framework, in which multiple forms of capital, including human, financial, and technological, generate claims on output. The framework further identifies participation conditions as a site of economic power and potential commodification, as access to production is governed by institutional and algorithmic systems that regulate inclusion, visibility, and opportunity. This perspective supports a shift in the analysis of economic justice from post-production redistribution toward pre-distribution, emphasizing the role of participation conditions in shaping economic outcomes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Labor Theory of Value; Value Theory; Political Economy; Means of Production; Means of Participation; Platform Economy; Digital Capitalism; Human Capital; Automation; Surplus Distribution; Pre-distribution; Economic Justice
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy; H - Public Economics > H0 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems

References

Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from U.S. labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188–2244. https://doi.org/10.1086/705716 Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press. Ellerman, D. (1992). Property and contract in economics: The case for economic democracy. Blackwell. Elson, D. (1979). Value: The representation of labour in capitalism. CSE Books. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Palgrave Macmillan. Hacker, J. S. (2011). The institutional foundations of middle-class democracy. Policy Network. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press. Hodgskin, T. (1825). Labour defended against the claims of capital. Ibn Khaldun. (1967). The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1377) Jevons, W. S. (1871). The theory of political economy. Macmillan. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Houghton Mifflin. Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1867) Menger, C. (1981). Principles of economics. New York University Press. (Original work published 1871) Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763 Petty, W. (1690). Political arithmetick. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542 Pistor, K. (2019). The code of capital: How the law creates wealth and inequality. Princeton University Press. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press. Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Information and the change in the paradigm in economics. Nobel Prize Lecture. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2001/stiglitz/lecture/ Sraffa, P. (1960). Production of commodities by means of commodities: Prelude to a critique of economic theory. Cambridge University Press. Vercellone, C. (2007). From formal subsumption to general intellect. Historical Materialism, 15(1), 13–36. Varoufakis, Y. (2023). Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. Bodley Head. Wark, M. (2019). Capital is dead: Is this something worse? Verso. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.