The Pretence of Precision: Endogeneity and the Epistemological Limits of Observational Econometrics

Singh, Rudra Pratap (2026): The Pretence of Precision: Endogeneity and the Epistemological Limits of Observational Econometrics.

Abstract

Standard econometric pedagogy rests heavily on a single, unverifiable assumption: that observed variables have zero covariance with the unobservable error term (Cov(X, �) =0) Practitioners routinely mistake the mechanical orthogonality of OLS residuals for a profound truth about the unseen universe, creating a dangerous illusion of precision. However, because human economies operate as complex systems of spontaneous order, omitted variable bias is not merely a technical glitch to be solved. It is the inescapable default of deeply entangled data. When subjected to logical scrutiny, the standard mathematical defences built to salvage causal inference, such as Instrumental Variables, Fixed Effects, and sensitivity bounds, quickly collapse. These defences function as epistemological displacements rather than solutions, largely ignoring the problem of induction and the infinite variance inherent to fat-tailed distributions. Ultimately, utilizing these endogenous models to optimize point estimates does not reduce uncertainty; it manufactures a dangerous illusion of precision. We argue that true statistical rigor requires an epistemology of via negativa. Quantitative methods must be repurposed to bound extreme exposures and identify structural fragility, rather than manufacturing a false sense of causal certainty

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Endogeneity, Spontaneous Order, Omitted Variable Bias, Epistemology, Complex Systems
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C50 - General

References

Angrist, J. D. and Pischke, J.-S. (2010) 'The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of econometrics', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), pp. 3-30. Hayek, F. A. (1952) The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Hayek, F. A. (1974) 'The pretence of knowledge', Nobel Memorial Lecture, 11 December. Laplace, P. S. (1814) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Translated by F.W. Truscott and F.L. Emory (1902). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Oster, E. (2019) 'Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence', Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), pp. 187-204. Taleb, N. N. (2007) The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House. Taleb, N. N. (2012) Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House. Taleb, N. N. (2020) Statistical Consequences of Fat Tails: Real World Preasymptotics, Epistemology, and Applications. STEM Academic Press. Wooldridge, J. M. (2015) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 6th edn. Boston: Cengage Learning.