The Price of Conservation: Tiger Population Growth and Microeconomic Outcomes in Buffer Zone Districts — Evidence from Madhya Pradesh

Dhruv, Dhruv Tyagi (2026): The Price of Conservation: Tiger Population Growth and Microeconomic Outcomes in Buffer Zone Districts — Evidence from Madhya Pradesh.

Abstract

India's tiger population has recovered substantially since the launch of Project Tiger in 1973. As per the All-India Tiger Estimation (2022), India's tiger population is estimated at 3,682 individuals (range: 3,167–3,925), reflecting an approximate annual growth rate of around 6% and representing one of the world's most celebrated conservation recoveries. Madhya Pradesh alone hosts 785 tigers across six reserves. This paper asks whether the communities living adjacent to these reserves have shared in the gains. Using district-level data from the National Family Health Survey matched to reserve boundaries across all 51 districts of Madhya Pradesh, I compare welfare outcomes in buffer-zone districts against non-adjacent districts within the same state. Buffer districts display significantly higher child stunting (+5.2 percentage points), lower sanitation access (−10.0 pp), lower use of clean cooking fuel (−9.6 pp), and lower rates of institutional delivery (−5.6 pp). A Difference-in-Differences design exploiting the NFHS panel reveals that stunting declined 9.0 pp less in buffer districts between 2015–16 and 2019–21 relative to comparable districts, suggesting that the rest of Madhya Pradesh improved faster than its conservation frontier. A propensity-score falsification test confirms this divergence is specific to reserve-adjacent communities and is not an artefact of regional demographic variation. These findings are consistent with forest-dependency constraints, restricted land use, and unequal access to public services in buffer zones, and raise the question of whether India's conservation dividend is being distributed equitably.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: tiger conservation, buffer zones, child nutrition, Difference-in-Differences, India, protected areas
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I15 - Health and Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O18 - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis ; Housing ; Infrastructure; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q23 - Forestry; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Bhorat, H., Naidoo, K., & van der Westhuizen, C. (2013). Welfare shifts in the post-apartheid South Africa: A comprehensive measurement of changes in living standards. Development Southern Africa, 30(4–5), 547–569. Brockington, D., & Igoe, J. (2006). Eviction for conservation: A global overview. Conservation and Society, 4(3), 424–470. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India. (2011). Census of India 2011: Primary Census Abstract and District Census Handbooks, Madhya Pradesh. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Dickman, A. J. (2010). Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human–wildlife conflict. Animal Conservation, 13(5), 458–466. Ferraro, P. J., & Hanauer, M. M. (2014). Quantifying causal mechanisms to determine how protected areas affect poverty through changes in ecosystem services and direct transfers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11), 4124–4129. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015–16: Madhya Pradesh Fact Sheets. Mumbai: IIPS. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019–21: Madhya Pradesh Fact Sheets. Mumbai: IIPS. Köhlin, G., Sills, E. O., Pattanayak, S. K., & Wilfong, C. (2011). Energy, gender and development: What are the linkages? Where is the evidence? World Bank Social Development Papers, No. 125. National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) and Wildlife Institute of India (WII). (2023). Status of Tigers in India 2022: Summary Report. New Delhi: NTCA, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2026). All-India Tiger Estimation 2022: Population and Growth Rate. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2076921 Victora, C. G., Adair, L., Fall, C., Hallal, P. C., Martorell, R., Richter, L., & Sachdev, H. S. (2008). Maternal and child undernutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. The Lancet, 371(9609), 340–357.