Instructor Attire and Voluntary Student Participation in Higher Education: Evidence from a Randomized Class-Section Experiment

Yoshdia, Ken (2026): Instructor Attire and Voluntary Student Participation in Higher Education: Evidence from a Randomized Class-Section Experiment.

Abstract

Students' engagement with a course is often measured through grades and attendance, yet much of what happens in a classroom is voluntary. This article studies one visible feature of teaching practice--instructor attire--and asks whether it changes that voluntary margin. The evidence comes from six first-year ``Information (Data Science)'' sections at Chiba University of Commerce. The same instructor taught all sections, using a common syllabus, schedule, and grading scheme; three sections were randomly assigned to formal attire and three to casual attire. The course is not an economics course, but the design speaks to a question familiar in economics education: whether observable teaching practices affect forms of student engagement that standard outcome measures miss. Formal attire is not associated with higher attendance or final exam scores. The participation margin looks different. Students in formal-attire sections submitted fewer ungraded reaction papers and wrote fewer words per submitted reaction paper. Exact randomization inference and wild-cluster bootstrap checks point in the same direction, while also showing how much uncertainty remains with only six randomized sections. A supplementary sentiment measure, coded from the original Japanese reactions, is too imprecise to support a separate conclusion. The main lesson is therefore about measurement as much as attire: voluntary-effort outcomes can reveal classroom responses that are not visible in grades or attendance alone.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: instructor attire; voluntary participation; economics education; higher education; field experiment.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions

References

Babcock, P. and J. R. Betts (2009). “Reduced-Class Distinctions: Effort, Ability, and the Education Production Function.” Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 314–322.

Blazar, D. (2018). “Validating Teacher Effects on Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors: Evidence from Random Assignment of Teachers to Students.” Education Finance and Policy, 13(3), 281–309.

Bonesrønning, H. (2004). “Can Effective Teacher Behavior Be Identified?” Economics of Education Review, 23(3), 237–247.

Carrell, S. E. and J. E. West (2010). “Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors.” Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), 409–432.

Cheng, A. and G. Zamarro (2018). “Measuring Teacher Non-Cognitive Skills and Its Impact on Students: Insight from the Measures of Effective Teaching Longitudinal Database.” Economics of Education Review, 64, 251–260.

Craig, J. D. (2015). “Does Instructor Appearance Affect Student Learning of Principles of Economics?” Australasian Journal of Economics Education, 12(2), 30–49.

Craig, J. D. and S. J. Savage (2014). “Instructor Attire and Student Performance: Evidence from an Undergraduate Industrial Organization Experiment.” International Review of Economics Education, 17, 55–65.

Feld, J., N. Salamanca and U. Zölitz (2019). “Students Are Almost as Effective as Professors in University Teaching.” Economics of Education Review, 73, 101912.

Figlio, D. N. (1999). “Functional Form and the Estimated Effects of School Resources.” Economics of Education Review, 18(2), 241–252.

Hanushek, E. A. (2003). “The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies.” Economic Journal, 113(485), F64–F98.

Hanushek, E. A. (2020). “Education Production Functions.” In S. Bradley and C. Green, eds., The Economics of Education, 2nd ed., Academic Press, 161–170.

Hanushek, E. A. and S. G. Rivkin (2006). “Teacher Quality.” In E. A. Hanushek and F. Welch, eds., Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 2, Elsevier, 1051–1078.

Jackson, C. K. (2018). “What Do Test Scores Miss? The Importance of Teacher Effects on Non-Test Score Outcomes.” Journal of Political Economy, 126(5), 2072–2107.

Lavin, A. M., T. L. Davies and D. L. Carr (2010). “The Impact of Instructor Attire on Student Perceptions of Faculty Credibility and Their Own Resultant Behavior.” American Journal of Business Education, 3(6), 51–62.

Lightstone, K., R. Francis and L. Kocum (2011). “University Faculty Style of Dress and Students’ Perception of Instructor Credibility.” International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15), 15–22.

Rockoff, J. E. (2004). “The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data.” American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.

Shepherd, D. and S. Yeon (2022). “Student Preferences about University Education Department Instructor Attire.” Knowledge, 2(2), 191–208.

Cameron, A. C., J. B. Gelbach and D. L. Miller (2008). “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 414–427.

MacKinnon, J. G. and M. D. Webb (2017). “Wild Bootstrap Inference for Wildly Different Cluster Sizes.” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 32(2), 233–254.

MacKinnon, J. G. and M. D. Webb (2018). “The Wild Bootstrap for Few (Treated) Clusters.” Econometrics Journal, 21(2), 114–135.