Did Slavery Impede the Growth of American Capitalism? Two Failed Natural Experiments

Francis, Joseph (2026): Did Slavery Impede the Growth of American Capitalism? Two Failed Natural Experiments.

Abstract

Two natural experiments reveal the limits of using causal inference to assess whether slavery impeded the growth of American capitalism in the nineteenth century. Superficially, both seem to produce meaningful results. A spatial re- gression discontinuity design (RDD) finds that farm values per acre showed no differences at the free-slave state border. A difference-in-differences (DiD) event study meanwhile suggests that abolition affected farm values more nega- tively where slavery had been more intense before the Civil War. Nonetheless, both of these findings are invalidated due to fundamental problems in the re- search designs. There are systematic violations of the Stable Unit Treatment Value Assumption (SUTVA), given that North and South were in a union for 70 years. Balance tests fail at the border, moreover, indicating that the as-good- as-random assumption does not hold. The failure of these natural experiments thus illustrates how difficult it can be to apply the methods of causal inference to a major question of economic history.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: causal inference, credibility revolution, economic history, methodology, slavery, United States
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J4 - Particular Labor Markets > J47 - Coercive Labor Markets; N - Economic History > N1 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics ; Industrial Structure ; Growth ; Fluctuations > N11 - U.S. ; Canada: Pre-1913; N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N21 - U.S. ; Canada: Pre-1913; N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries > N51 - U.S. ; Canada: Pre-1913; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth

References

Allen, Treb, Winston Chen, and Suresh Naidu (2025) “The Economic Geography of American Slavery.” NBER Working Paper 34356, Oct. [https://www.nber.org/papers/w34356](https://www.nber.org/papers/w34356).

Angrist, Joshua D. and Jörn-Steffen Pischke (2010) “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 24(2), 3–30.

Baker, Andrew, Brantly Callaway, Scott Cunningham, Andrew Goodman-Bacon, and Pedro H. C. Sant’Anna (2025) “Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner’s Guide.” [http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13323](http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.13323).

Bleakley, Hoyt and Paul W. Rhode (2024) “The Economic Effects of American Slavery: Tests at the Border.” NBER Working Paper 32640, June. [https://www.nber.org/papers/w32640](https://www.nber.org/papers/w32640).

Cattaneo, Matias D., Nicolás Idrobo, and Rocío Titiunik (2019) A Practical Introduction to Regression Discontinuity Designs: Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cattaneo, Matias D. and Rocío Titiunik (2022) “Regression Discontinuity Designs.” Annual Review of Economics. 14(1), 821–851.

Cattaneo, Matias D., Rocio Titiunik, and Ruiqi Rae Yu (2025a) “Estimation and Inference in Boundary Discontinuity Designs.” Unpublished paper, June 11. [http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05670](https://www.google.com/search?q=http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05670).

Cattaneo, Matias D., Rocio Titiunik, and Ruiqi Rae Yu (2025b) “rd2d: Causal Inference in Boundary Discontinuity Designs.” Unpublished paper, June 11. [http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07989](http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07989).

Craft, Erik D. and James Monks (2008) “The Postbellum Demand for Cotton Revisited.” Explorations in Economic History. 45(2), 199–206.

Hanson, John R. (1979) “World Demand for Cotton during the Nineteenth Century: Wright’s Estimates Re-examined.” Journal of Economic History. 39(4), 1015–1021.

Hummel, Jeffrey Rogers (2001) “Deadweight Loss and the American Civil War: The Political Economy of Slavery, Secession, and Emancipation.” PhD diss., University of Texas at Austin.

Imbens, Guido W. and Donald B. Rubin (2015) Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leamer, Edward E. (1983) “Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics.” American Economic Review. 73(1), 31–43.

Leamer, Edward E. (2010) “Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 24(2), 31–46.

Manson, Steven, Jonathan Schroeder, David Van Riper, Tracy Kugler, and Steven Ruggles (2022) “IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS): Version 17.0.” Dataset, IPUMS. [https://www.ipums.org/projects/ipums-nhgis/d050.v16.0](https://www.ipums.org/projects/ipums-nhgis/d050.v16.0).

Miller, Douglas A. and Richard A. White (1998) “A Conterminous United States Multilayer Soil Characteristics Dataset for Regional Climate and Hydrology Modeling.” Earth Interactions. 2(2), 1–26.

Morck, Randall and Bernard Yeung (2011) “Economics, History, and Causation.” Business History Review. 85(1), 39–63.

Morgan, Mary S. (2012) The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morgan, Mary S., Kim M. Hajek, and Dominic J. Berry (eds.) (2022) Narrative Science: Reasoning, Representing and Knowing since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rubin, Donald B. (1980) “Comment: Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test.” Journal of the American Statistical Association. 75(371), 591–593.

Surdam, David G. (1998) “King Cotton: Monarch or Pretender? The State of the Market for Raw Cotton on the Eve of the American Civil War.” Economic History Review. 51(1), 113–132.

Taylor, George Rogers (1951) The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860. New York: Rinehart.

Titiunik, Rocío (2021) “Natural Experiments.” In: James N. Druckman and Donald P. Green (eds.), Advances in Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 103–129.

Wright, Gavin (1974) “Cotton Competition and the Post-Bellum Recovery of the American South.” Journal of Economic History. 34(3), 610–635.

Wright, Gavin (1978) The Political Economy of the Cotton South: Households, Markets, and Wealth in the Nineteenth Century. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Wright, Gavin (1986) Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy since the Civil War. New York: Basic Books.

Wright, Gavin (2006) Slavery and American Economic Development. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Wright, Gavin (2022) “Slavery and the Rise of the Nineteenth-Century American Economy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 36(2), 123–148.

Yang, Dongyhu (1992) “The Debate over the Growth in the Demand for Cotton.” In: Robert William Fogel, Ralph A. Galantine, Richard L. Manning, and Nicholas Scott Cardell (eds.), Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery: Evidence and Methods. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 269–272.