Zhang, ZhongXiang (2000): An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms.
Download (162kB) | Preview
The Kyoto Protocol is the first international environmental agreement that sets legally binding greenhouse gas emissions targets and timetables for Annex I countries. It incorporates emissions trading, joint implementation and the clean development mechanism. Because each of the Articles defining the three flexibility mechanisms carries wording that the use of the mechanism must be supplemental to domestic actions, the supplementarity provisions have been the focus of the international climate change negotiations subsequent to Kyoto. Whether the supplementarity clauses will be translated into a concrete ceiling, and if so, how should a concrete ceiling on the use of the three flexible mechanisms be defined remain to be determined. To date, the European Union (EU) has put forward a proposal for ceilings on the use of these flexibility mechanisms. Given the great policy relevance to the ongoing negotiations on the overall issues of flexibility mechanisms, this paper has provided a quantitative assessment of the implications of the EU ceilings with and without considering the however clause. Our results suggest that such ceilings are less restrictive to the EU than to the US and Japan in terms of levels of restriction on permits imports, and can prevent one third of the amount of hot air from entering the market. Our results also demonstrate that although the US and Japan are firmly opposed to such a restriction, they tend to benefit more from it than the EU which strongly advocates such ceilings, in terms of the reductions in the total abatement costs relative to the no trading case. Moreover, their gains can increase even further, provided that the however clause would operate as intended.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||An assessment of the EU proposal for ceilings on the use of Kyoto flexibility mechanisms|
|Keywords:||Emissions trading; Clean development mechanism; Joint implementation; Greenhouse gases; European Union; Supplementarity restrictions|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||ZhongXiang Zhang|
|Date Deposited:||05. Feb 2009 03:21|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 21:28|
Austria, 1998. Second National Climate Report of the Austrian Federal Government. Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
Baron, R., Bosi, M., Lanza, A., Pershing, J., 1999. A preliminary analysis of the EU proposal on the Kyoto mechanisms. Unpublished manuscript, International Energy Agency, Paris.
CEC, 1999. Preparing for Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Commission Communications to the Council and the Parliament. COM(1999)230, Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Brussels.
Dutschke, M., Michaelowa, A., 1998. Creation and sharing of credits through the clean development mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol. HWWA Discussion Paper No. 62, Hamburg.
Ellerman, A.D., Wing, I.S., 2000. Supplementarity: an invitation to monopsony?. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 59, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Estonia, 1998. Estonian Second National Report under the United Nation’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
European Union, 1999. Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions. No. 8346/99, 18 May, Brussels. Greece, 1997. Second National Communication to the UNFCCC. Available at: http://www.unfccc.de.
Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., Brack, D., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment. Earthscan, London, 342 pp.
Haites, E., 1998. International emissions trading and compliance with greenhouse gas emissions limitation commitments. Unpublished manuscript, Margaree Consultants Inc., Toronto, Canada.
Jefferson, M., 1997. Potential climate change: carbon dioxide emissions 1990-96. World Energy Council Journal, 76-82.
Lanchbery, J., 1998. Input to the UNCTAD study on greenhouse gas emissions trading: defining the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines for verification, reporting and accountability. Unpublished manuscript, Verification Technology Information Centre, London.
Manne, A.S., Richels, R.G., 1999. On Russia “hot air” and the Kyoto Protocol. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
OECD, 1999. Taking Action against Climate Change: The Kyoto Protocol. ECO/CPE/WP1(99)/6, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
Tietenberg, T., Grubb, M., Michaelowa, A., Swift, B., Zhang, Z.X., 1999. International Rules for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: Defining the Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines for Verification, Reporting and Accountability. UNCTAD/GDS/GFSB/Misc.6, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 116 pp.
UNFCCC, 1996. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Second Session, Held at Geneva from 8 to 19 July 1996: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties on its Second Session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1996/15/Add.1, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 1998. National Communications from Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention: Second Compilation and Synthesis of Second National Communications. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1998/11/Add.2, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 1999a. Part Two of the Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Fourth Session, Held at Buenos Aires from 2 to 14 November 1998: Action Taken by the Conference of the Parties on its Fourth Session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/CP/1998/16/Add.1, Bonn.
UNFCCC, 1999b. National Communications from Parties Included in Annex I to the Convention: Report on National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Submissions from Annex I Parties for 1990 to 1996. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/SBI/1999/5/Add.1, Bonn.
US Administration, 1998. The Kyoto Protocol and the President’s Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis. Washington, DC.
VROM, 1998. Update of the Second Netherlands’ National Communication on Climate Change Policies. Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM), The Hague.
Zhang, Z.X., 1999. Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for All Three Flexibility Mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol. Report Prepared for the Asian Development Bank under Contract TA-5592-REG, Faculty of Law and Faculty of Economics, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Zhang, Z.X., 2000. Estimating the size of the potential market for the Kyoto flexibility mechanisms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics 136, 491-521.