Measuring the size of underground economy in Iran with emphasis on the incentives for evasion of insurance premium payment (1961 – 2001)

Nikopour, Hesam (2003): Measuring the size of underground economy in Iran with emphasis on the incentives for evasion of insurance premium payment (1961 – 2001).

Abstract

This paper attempts to estimate the size of underground economy in Iran and to identify the elements having taken a role in the creation of the same for the period 1961-2001 by using modified currency ratio method as a monetary approach to the estimation of the size of underground economy. Regression model has been stipulated with the consideration of special economic circumstances prevailing in Iran. Currency ratio (circulating currency to total private sector bank deposits ratio) has been considered as a function of economic development (per capita income), inflation rate, the degree of urbanization (a measure of the development of financial institutions) and private consumption expenditures. Government expenditures to GDP ratio (a measure of government economic interventions), import tax burden, direct tax burden, social security tax burden and black market foreign exchange rate have been also considered as the indicators and variables reflecting underground economy. The model has been estimated by using an auto-regressive distributed lag (ARDL) method and the results are indicative of a high volume of such activities within the frameworks of the economy of Iran. The mean size of underground economy has been 27.76 percent of GDP during the period of study. Out of all the factors creating the underground economy, the size of government fraction of economy has had the greatest effect and social insurance burden has had the smallest one. Although the increase in insurance burden is in itself a factor in the creation of underground economy, in its turn has a striking negative impact on the performance and stability of social insurance funds.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: underground economy, ARDL, modified currency ratio, social security contribution evasion, Iran
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E26 - Informal Economy ; Underground Economy

References

Alizadeh, P. (2000). The Economy of Iran, Dilemmas of an Islamic State. London: I.B.Taunis Publishers.

Bagachwa, M. S. D. and A. Naho (1995). “Estimating the Second Economy in Tanzania”, World Development, Vol. 23(8), PP. 1387-1399.

Bhattacharyya, D. K. (1990). “An Econometric Method of Estimating the Hidden Economy, United Kingdom (1960-1984): Estimates and Tests”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 100, PP. 703-717.

Cremer, H. and F. Gahvari (1995). “Tax Evasion and the Optimum General Income Tax”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 60, PP. 235-249.

Frey, B. S. and H. Weck- Hanneman (1984). “The Hidden Economy as an Unobservable Variable”, European Economic Review, Vol. 26, PP. 33-53.

Giles, D. E. A. (1999). “Measuring the Hidden Economy: Implications for Econometric Modeling”, Economic Journal, Vol. 109, PP. 370-380.

Giles, D. E. A. and L. M. Tedds (2000), “Modeling the Underground Economics in Canada and New Zealand: A Comparative Analysis”, Econometrics Working Paper Ewp0003.

Harris, R. I. D. (1995). Using Co-integration Analysis in Econometric Modeling. London: Prentice Hall.

Matthews, K. G. P. (1982). “Demand for Currency and the Black Economy in the UK”, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, PP. 3-22.

Pyle, D. J. (1989). Tax Evasion and the Black Economy, Hong Kong: Macmillan.

Schneider, F. and D. H. Este (2000). “Shadow Economics: Size, Causes, and Consequences”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVIII, PP. 77-114.

Tanzi, V. (1983). “The Underground economy in the United States: Annual Estimates: 1930-1980”, I.M.F. Staff Papers, Vol. 30, PP. 283-305.