Green, Kesten C and Armstrong, J. Scott and Soon, Willie (2009): Validity of Climate Change Forecasting for Public Policy Decision Making.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (269kB) | Preview
Policymakers need to know whether prediction is possible and if so whether any proposed forecasting method will provide forecasts that are substantively more accurate than those from the relevant benchmark method. Inspection of global temperature data suggests that it is subject to irregular variations on all relevant time scales and that variations during the late 1900s were not unusual. In such a situation, a “no change” extrapolation is an appropriate benchmark forecasting method. We used the U.K. Met Office Hadley Centre’s annual average thermometer data from 1850 through 2007 to examine the performance of the benchmark method. The accuracy of forecasts from the benchmark is such that even perfect forecasts would be unlikely to help policymakers. For example, mean absolute errors for 20- and 50-year horizons were 0.18°C and 0.24°C. We nevertheless demonstrate the use of benchmarking with the example of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s 1992 linear projection of long-term warming at a rate of 0.03°C-per-year. The small sample of errors from ex ante projections at 0.03°C-per-year for 1992 through 2008 was practically indistinguishable from the benchmark errors. Validation for long-term forecasting, however, requires a much longer horizon. Again using the IPCC warming rate for our demonstration, we projected the rate successively over a period analogous to that envisaged in their scenario of exponential CO2 growth—the years 1851 to 1975. The errors from the projections were more than seven times greater than the errors from the benchmark method. Relative errors were larger for longer forecast horizons. Our validation exercise illustrates the importance of determining whether it is possible to obtain forecasts that are more useful than those from a simple benchmark before making expensive policy decisions.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Validity of Climate Change Forecasting for Public Policy Decision Making|
|Keywords:||climate model, ex ante forecasts, out-of-sample errors, predictability, public policy, relative absolute errors, unconditional forecasts|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming
|Depositing User:||Kesten Green|
|Date Deposited:||24. Feb 2009 04:08|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 16:11|
Armstrong, J. S. (2001), Evaluating forecasting models,” Principles of Forecasting. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston.
Armstrong, J. S., & Collopy, F. (1992). Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons. International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 69-80.
Bergquist, L. (2008). Humans started causing global warming 5,000 years ago, UW study says. Journal Sentinel, posted 17 December, http://www.jsonline.com/news/education/36279759.html
Green, K. C., & Armstrong, J. S. (2007). Global warming: Forecasts by scientists versus scientific forecasts, Energy & Environment, 18, 997-1022.
IPCC (1990). Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Edited by J.T. Houghton, G.J. Jenkins, and J.J. Ephraums. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom.
IPCC (1992). Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Edited by J.T. Houghton, B.A. Callander, and S.K. Varney. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom.
IPCC (2007). Summary for Policymakers, in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. and New York, NY, USA.
McKibben, W. (2007). Warning on warming. New York Review of Books, 54, 15 March.
McKitrick, R., & Michaels, P. J. (2007). Quantifying the influence of anthropogenic surface processes and inhomogeneities on gridded global climate data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, doi:10.1029/2007JD008465.
Tierney, J. (1990). Betting the planet. New York Times, December 2.
Available Versions of this Item
Benchmark forecasts for climate change. (deposited 15. Dec 2008 02:41)
Benchmark forecasts for climate change. (deposited 21. Dec 2008 07:45)
- Validity of Climate Change Forecasting for Public Policy Decision Making. (deposited 24. Feb 2009 04:08) [Currently Displayed]
- Benchmark forecasts for climate change. (deposited 21. Dec 2008 07:45)