Yamamura, Eiji (2009): Effects of sex preference and social pressure on fertility in changing Japanese families.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_14647.pdf Download (297kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study explored how social pressure related to parental preference for the sex of their children affects fertility. Pre-war and post-war generations were compared using individual level data previously collected in Japan in 2002. In the pre-war generation, if the first child was a daughter, the total number of children tended to increase regardless of the mother’s sex preference. This tendency was not observed for the post-war generation. Results suggest that social pressure related to giving birth to a son led to high fertility in the pre-war generation; however, fertility was not influenced by social pressure in the post-war generation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Effects of sex preference and social pressure on fertility in changing Japanese families |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fertility, son preference, social pressure, family structure |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J13 - Fertility ; Family Planning ; Child Care ; Children ; Youth J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination |
Item ID: | 14647 |
Depositing User: | eiji yamamura |
Date Deposited: | 14 Apr 2009 13:51 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 04:56 |
References: | Ahn N, Mira P. (2002). A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries. Journal of Population Economy, 15: 667-682. Arnold F, Zhaoxiang L. (1986). Sex preference, fertility, and family planning in China. Population and Development Review, 12 :221-246. Becker G (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75: 493-517. Becker, G.., Murphy, K. (2000). Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Behrman J. (1988) Intrahousehold allocation of nutrients in rural India: Are boys favored? Do parents exhibit inequality aversion? Oxford Economic Papers, 40: 32-54. Behrman J., Pollak R., Taubman P. (1986) Do parents favor boys? International Economic Review, 27: 33-54. Ben-Porath Y., Welch F. (1976). Do sex preferences really matter? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90: 285-307. Ben-Porath Y., Welch F. (1980). On sex preferences and family size. Research in Population Economics, 2: 387-399. Cigno A. (1991). Economics of family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A. Dahl GB., Moretti E. (2008). The demand for sons. Review of Economic Studies, 75(4): 1085-1120. Das, N. (1987) Sex preference and fertility on reproductive behavior: A study of recent Indian data. Demography, 24:517-530 Galor O, Weil DN (1996) The gender gap, fertility and growth. American Economic Review, 86(3): 374-387. Greif, A. (1994). Cultural beliefs and the organization of society: A historical and theoretical reflection on collectivist and individualist societies. Journal of Political 102, 912-950. Greif, A. (2002). Institutions and impersonal exchange: from communal to individual responsibility. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 158, 168-204. Gutierrez-Domenech M. (2008).The impact of the labour market on the timing of marriage and births in Spain. Journal of Population Economy, 21(1): 83-110. Hayami, Y. (1998). Norms and rationality in the evolution of economic systems: A view from Asian villages. Japanese Economic Review 49, 36-53. Hayami, Y. (2001). Development Economics: From the poverty to the wealth of nations. Oxford University Press, New York. Hendry J. (1981) Marriage in Changing Japan: Community and society. Tuttle Publishers, Tokyo. Kawaguchi D., Miyazaki J. (2009).Working mothers and son’s preferences regarding female labor supply: Direct evidence from stated preferences. Journal of Population Economy, 22(1): 115-130. Leung, S.G. (1988). On tests for sex preferences. Journal of Population Economics, 1: 95-114. Leung, S.G. (1991). A stochastic dynamic analysis of parental sex preferences and fertility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121: 1063-1088. Leung, S.G. (1994). Will sex selection reduce fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 7(4): 379-392. Lundberg, S. (2005) Sons, daughters, and parental behavior. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(3): 340-356. Ramseyer, J.M. (1996). Odd markets in Japanese history: Law and economic growth. Cambridge University Press, New York. Yamamura, E. (2008a) Impact of formal and informal deterrents on driving behavior,. Journal of Socio-economics, 37(6): 2505-2512. Yamamura, E. (2008b) The market for lawyers and social capital: Are informal rules a substitute for formal ones?.Review of Law & Economics, 4(1): Article 23. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/14647 |