Women’s Participation in Forestry: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues

Sarker, Debnarayan and Das, Nimai (2001): Women’s Participation in Forestry: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Published in: Economic and Political Weekly , Vol. 37, No. 43 (2002): pp. 4407-4412.

Abstract

The Theoretical explanations that depend on WED, which focuses on the material role of women for women’s ‘closeness’ with nature, Ecofeminism, which emphasizes the natural and spiritual content of women for the same logic, and GAD, that firmly believes that gender-sensitive planning for JFM should be to find ways so that women can institutionalize the bargaining strength they have, are increasingly reflected in our National Forest Policy and in the JFM legislation of some of the States. This paper, in an attempt to examine the extent of women’s involvement in forestry and their role in JFM in West Bengal, a key precursor to the JFM concept for India, observes that despite women’s greater involvement in forestry, State JFM resolution has proved inadequate for ensuring their participation in community institutions. But the setting up of Female FPC in some areas of West Bengal by recent policy provisions has extended the scope of women’s active participation in Forest Management.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Women’s Participation in Forestry: Some Theoretical Issues
• Language: English
• Keywords: Joint forest management, Gender sensitive forest management group, Bengal forest resource, Women's participation in forestry
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q23 - Forestry

References

Agarwal, B. (1992):‘The Gender and Environment Debate: Lessons from India’. Feminist Studies 18 (1): 119-58.

“--------------” (1994): ‘Gender, Resistance and Land: Interlinked Struggles over Resources and Meanings in South Asia’. Journal of Peasant Studies 22 (1): 81-125.

“--------------” (1997): ‘Environmental Action, Gender Equity and Women’s Participation’. Development and Change 28(1): 1-44.

Arora, D. (1994): ‘From State Regulation to People’ Participation: Case of Joint Forest Management in India’, Economic and political weekly 29(12): 691-98.

Bird P. (1996): ODA’s Review of Participatory Forest Management : Synthesis of Findings. ODA Review Working Paper 6, London.

Britt-Kapoor, C. (1994): A Tale of Two Committees: Villager Perspectives on Local Institutions, Forest Management and Resource Use in Two Central Himalayan Indian Villages. Overseas Development Institution Rural Development Forestry Network Paper 17a, London.

Correa, M(1999) : The need for Emancipatory Research: Experiences from JFPM in Uttar Kannada’ in Jeffery, R and Sundar N (eds), A New Moral Economy For India’s Forests? Discourses of Community and Participation. Sage Publication, New Delhi.

Hobley, M. (1996): Participatory Forestry: The Process of Change in India and Nepal. ODI Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3.

Jackson, C. (1993a): ‘Doing What Comes Naturally? Women and Environment in Development’, World Development 21 (12): 1947-963.

Jackson, C (1993b): Environmentalisms and Gender Interests in the Third World’, Development and Change 24 (4): 649-77.

Jackson, (1993c): ‘Questioning Synergism : Win-Win with Women in Population and Environmental Policies?’ Journal of International Development 5(6): 651-68.

Jeffery, R. and Sundar, N (1999): A new Moral Economy For India’s Forests? Discourses of Community and participation, Sage Publication, New Delhi.

Joekes, S., N. Heyzer, R. Oniango and V. Salles (1994): ‘Gender, Environment and Population’, Development and Change, 25(1).

Kameswari, V.L.V. (2001): ‘Gendered Communication and Access to Social Space: Issues in Forest Management, Economic and Political Weekly, Feb 23.

Leach, M. and C. Green, (1995): ‘Gender and Environmental History: Moving Beyond the Narratives of the Past’. Contemporary Women-Environment Policy Debates, Sussex.

Lichbach, M.I. (1996): West Bengal Joint Forestry Management Project. London: Overseas Development Administration Report on an Orientation Visit to the Indian Forestry Field Management Office.

Locke, C. (1999): ‘Gender Policy in Joint Forest Management’ in Jeffery, R. and Sundar, N. (eds) A New Moral Economy For India’s Forests? Discourses of community and Participation, Sage Publication, New Delhi.

Lynch, O.J. and K. Talbott (1995): Balancing Acts: Community-Based Forest Management and National Law in Asia and the Pacific. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.

Mayoux, L. (1995): ‘Beyond Naivity : Women, Gender Inequality and Participatory Development’, Development and Change 26 (2): 235-58.

Mies, M. and Shivea, V. (1997): Ecofeminism in Feminism: Oxford Readers Ed by Kemp, S. and Squires, J. P.

Mitra, A. (1997): ‘Joint forest Management: Case studies’ Yojana, August.

Moitra, S. (1996): ‘Wemen, communication and Science: Identity Question’ Economic and Political Weekly 20 (8).

Quiggin, J. (1993): ‘Common Property, Equality and Development’, World Development 21 (7): 1123-138.

Razavi, S. and C. Miller. (1995): From WID to GAD: Conceptual Shifts in the Women and Development Discourse. UNRISD Occasional Paper-1.

Rocheleau, D., B. Thomas-Slayter and E. Wangari (1996): Gender and Environment: Feminist Political Ecology Perspective’, in D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas Slayter and E. Wangari (eds), Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences. New York: Routledge.

Sen, A. (1987): Gender and Cooperative conflicts. World Institute for Development Economics Research Working Paper 18.

Shah, M.K. and P.Shah, (1995): ‘Gender, Environment and Livelihood Security : An Alternative Viewpoint from India’, IDS Bulletin 26, 75-78.

Tinker, I. (1994): ‘Women and Community Forestry in Nepal: Expectations and Realities’, Society and Natural Resources 7 (4): 367-81.

Watson, J.J. (1989): ‘The Evolution of Appropriate Resource Management Systems’, in F.Berkes (ed.), Common Property Resources : Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.