Das, Nimai and Sarker, Debnarayan (2008): Study on Forest Dependent Households under a Household Model Framework.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_15328.pdf Download (206kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study suggests that JFM households receive higher economic benefit after JFM: the physical increase of forest related works has a positive impact on the prices of the same influencing higher hours (time) of work which help them increase higher annual per capita net real income. The poorer the households are according to their economic status, greater is the dependence on forest and so greater is the extent of involvement in low return forest activities (NTFPs) and forest wage work. It might indicate that JFM plays a positive role for economic security of the forest fringe households.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Study on Forest Dependent Households under a Household Model Framework |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Joint forest management (JFM) programme, JFM and non-JFM forests, forest dependent household, non-timber forest products, forest income. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q23 - Forestry D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods |
Item ID: | 15328 |
Depositing User: | Nimai Das |
Date Deposited: | 21 May 2009 13:53 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:21 |
References: | Angelsen, A. and S. Wunder (2003), Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 40, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. Arnold, M. (2001), Forestry Poverty and Aid, Occasional Paper No. 33(E), Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. Baland, J.M. and J.P. Platteau (1996), Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is there a Role for Rural Communities? Clarendon Press, Oxford. Becker, G. S.(1965), ‘A Theory of Allocation of Time’, Economic Journal, 75, pp. 493-517. Berkes, F. (ed.) (1989), Common Property Resources. Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development, Belhaven Press, London. Bromley, D.W. (ed.) (1992), Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy, Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco. Cavendish, W. (1999), Poverty, Inequality and Environmental Resources: Quantitative Analysis of Rural Households, Working Paper Series No. 99-9, Center for the Study of African Economics, Oxford. Correa, M. (1999), The Need for Emancipatory Research: Experiences from JFPM in Uttar Kannada, in R. Jeffery and N. Sundar (eds.) A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? Discourses of Community and Participation (pp. 216- 234), Sage Publications, New Delhi. Dutta K.K. (1940), The Santal Insurrection of 1955-1857, University of Calcutta: Calcutta. Duyker, E. (1987), Tribal Guerrillas: The Santals of West Bengal and the Naxalite Movement, Oxford University Press: Delhi. Fisher, M. (2004), Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 9, 135-154. Goon, A. M., M.K. Gupta and B. Das Gupta (1985), Basic Statistics (Fourth Revised Edition), The World Press Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta. Guha, R. (1989), The Unquiet Woods, Oxford University Press: Delhi. Gupta, S. C. (1992), Fundamentals of Statistics (Fifth Edition), Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai. Jodha, N.S. (1992), Common Property Resources and Rural Poor in Dry Regions of India, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 21, 1169-1181. Jodha, N.S. (1986), Common Property Resources: A Missing Dimension of Development Strategies, Discussion Paper No. 169, The World Bank, Washington DC. Kumar, S. (2002), Does “Participation” in Common Pool Resource Management Help the poor? A Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Joint Forest Management in Jharkhand, India, World Development, Vol. 30, No. 5, 763-782. Kumar, S., N. Saxena, Y. Alagh and K. Mitra (2000), India: Alleviating Poverty through Forest Development – Evaluation Country Case Study, The World Bank, Washington DC. Lama, A. and M. Buchy (2002), Gender, Class, Caste and Participation: The Case of Community Forestry in Nepal, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp.27-41. Lancaster, K. J.(1966), ‘ A New Approach to Consumer Theory’, Journal of Political Economy, 74, pp. 132-57, April. Martin, F. (1992), Common Pool Resources and Collective Action: A Bibliography, Paper presented to the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington, Indiana. Naik, G. (1995), Determinants of People’s Participation in Joint Forest Management, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad (Mimeo). Pattanayak, S.K., E.O. Sills and R.A. Kramer (2004), Seeing the forest for the fuel, Environment and Development Economics, Vol. 9, 155-179. Poffenberger, M. (1995), The Resurgence of Community Forest Management in the Jungle Mahals of West Bengal, in D. Arnold and R. C. Guha (eds.) Nature, Culture and Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia (336-69), Oxford University Press: Delhi. Ravillion, M. (2001), The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: An Introduction to Impact Evaluation, The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 1. Reddy, V. R. and J, Soussan (2004), Assessing the Impact of Watershed Development Programmes: A Sustainable Rural Livelihoods Framework, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 331-343. Reddy, V. R., M. G. Reddy, S. Galab, J, Soussan and O. Springate-Baginski (2004), Participatory Watershed Development in India: Can it Sustain Rural Livelihoods?, Development and Change, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 297-326. Sarker, D. and N. Das (2006a), Towards a Sustainable Joint Forest Management Programme: Evidence from Western Midnapore Division in West Bengal, South Asia Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 269-289. Sarker, D. and N. Das (2006b), Social Capital and Joint Forest Management Programme: A Comparative Study of Female-headed and Joint Forest Protection Committees in West Bengal, Journal of Rural Development, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 537-563. Sarker, D. and N. Das (2007), Efficiency of Market Behaviour of NTFPs for households under JFMP: A Case Study in West Bengal, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 80-98. Sarker, D. and N. Das (2008), A Study of Economic Outcome of Joint Forest Management Programme in West Bengal: The Strategic Decisions between Government and Forest Fringe Community, Indian Economic Review, Vol. 43, No. 1. Sarmah, D. and S. N. Rai (2001), Forest Resource Management in India: Role of the State and its Effectiveness, in S.N. Chary and V. Vyasulu (eds.) Environment and Management (206-220), Macmillan: New Delhi. Saxena, N. C. and M. Sarin (1999), The Western Ghats Forestry and Environmental Project in Karnataka: A Preliminary Assessment, in R. Jeffery and N. Sundar (eds.) A New Moral Economy for India’s Forests? Discourses of Community and Participation (pp. 181- 215), Sage Publications, New Delhi. Scherr, S.J., A. White and D. Kaimowitz (2002), Making Markets Work for Forest Communities, Forest Trends Policy Brief, Washington DC. Singh, K. (1994), Managing Common Pool Resources: Principles and Case Studies, Oxford University Press, Delhi. Singh, N.M. (2001), Women and Community Forests in Orissa: Rights and Management, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 257-270. Somanathan, E. (1991), Deforestation, Property Rights and Incentives in Central Himalaya, Economic and Political Weekly, January 26, PE37-46. SPWD (1998), Joint Forest Management Updated, Society for Promotion of Wastelands Development, New Delhi. World Bank (2001), A Revised Forest Strategy for the World Bank Group (Draft), The World Bank, Washington DC. World Bank (2006), India: Unlocking Opportunities for Forest-Dependent People, The World Bank, Agriculture and Rural Development Sector Unit, South Asia Region, Oxford University Press, New Delhi. Wunder, S. (2001), Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests – What Scope for Synergies?, World Development, Vol. 29, 1817- 1833. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/15328 |