Oxoby, Robert J. and Spraggon, John (2004): Yours, Mine, and Ours: The Effect of Ersatz Property Rights on Outcome Based Fairness and Reciprocity.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_1535.pdf Download (171kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We report laboratory data on earned wealth effects in a series of anonymous dictator games. In addition to a standard (baseline) treatment in which wealth was determined by the experimenter, we conduct treatments in which either the dictator or the receiver earned wealth used in the subsequent dictator game. In our baseline treatment, we observe the standard result: on average, dictators allocate receivers twenty percent. In treatments where the dictator earned wealth, we observe the theoretic prediction of zero offers to receivers. In treatments where the receiver earned wealth, we observe distributions of offers in which the receiver’s share exceeds fifty percent. We interpret these results as evidence of the importance of property rights in determining individuals’ social preferences.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Institute for Advanced Policy Research |
Original Title: | Yours, Mine, and Ours: The Effect of Ersatz Property Rights on Outcome Based Fairness and Reciprocity. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Dictator Games; Property Rights; Social Preferences |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General |
Item ID: | 1535 |
Depositing User: | Robert Oxoby |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jan 2007 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 05:40 |
References: | Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W., Vesterlund, L., 2003. The carrot or the stick: Rewards, punishment and cooperation. American Economic Review 93 (3), 893–902. Arkes, H. R., Joyner, C. A., Pezzo, M. V., Siegel-Jacobs, K., Stone, E., 1994. The psychology of windfall gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59 (3), 331–347. Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 122–142. Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., Ockenfels, A., 2004. Fair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteries. CSIC working paper. Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., 2000. A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 30 (1), 166–193. Bolton, G. E., Ockenfels, A., 2005. A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility. Economic Theory 25, 957–982. Camerer, C. F., 2003. Behavioral Game Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ. Carmichael, L., MacLeod, W. B., 2003. Caring about sunk costs: A behavioral solution to the hold-up problem. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19 (1), 106–118. Charness, G., Rabin, M., 2002. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (3), 817–869. Cherry, T. L., 2001. Mental accounting and other-regarding behavior: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Psychology 22, 605–615. Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., Shogren, J. F., 2002. Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review 92 (4), 1218–1221. Dufwenberg, M., Kirchsteiger, G., 2004. A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior 47 (2), 268–298. Engelmann, D., Strobel, M., 2004. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments. American Economic Review 94 (4), 857–869. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K., 1999. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3), 817–868. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N., Sefton, M., 1994. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 6 (3), 347–369. Gaechter, S., Riedl, A., 2003. Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claims. CESIfo Working paper No. 697. Gantner, A., G¨uth, W., K¨onigstein, M., 2001. Equitable choices in bargaining games with joint production. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46, 209–225. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., 2001. In search of homo-economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91 (2), 73–78. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Smith, V., 1996. Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review 86 (3), 653–660. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Smith, V. L., 1994. Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7, 346–380. Hoffman, E., Spitzer, M., 1985. Entitlements, rights, and fairness: An experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. Journal of Legal Studies 14, 259–297. Konow, J., 2000. Fair shares: Accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review 90 (4), 1072–1091. Konow, J., 2003. Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature 41 (4), 1186–1237. McCabe, K. A., Rigdon, M. L., Smith, V. L., 2003. Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52 (2), 267–275. McCabe, K. A., Smith, V. L., 2000. Goodwill accounting in economic exchange. In: Gigerenzer, G., Selten, R. (Eds.), Bounded Rationality: The Adaptive Toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 319–340. McClintock, C. G., Keil, L. J., 1982. Equity and social exchange. In: Greenberg, J., Cohen, R. L. (Eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior. Academic Press, New York, Ch. 10, pp. 337–387. Rabin, M., 1993. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83 (5), 1281–1302. Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., Zamir, S., 1991. Bargaining and market behaivor in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburg, and Tokyo: An experimental investigation. American Economic Review 81 (5), 1068–1095. Ruffle, B. J., 1998. More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior 23 (2), 247–265. Selten, R., 1978. The equity principle in economic behavior. In: Gottinger, H., Leinfellner, W. (Eds.), Decision Theory and Social Ethics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 289–301. Sonnegard, J., 1996. Determination of first movers in sequential bargaining games: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology 17, 359–386. Thaler, R. H., 1999. Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12, 183–206. Walster, E., Walster, G., Berscheid, E., 1978. Equity: Theory and Research. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/1535 |