Lifeline or Means-Testing? Electric Utility Subsidies in Honduras

Wodon, Quentin and Ajwad, Mohamed Ishan and Siaens, Corinne (2003): Lifeline or Means-Testing? Electric Utility Subsidies in Honduras. Published in: Infrastructure for Poor People: Public Policy for Private Provision (2003): pp. 277-296.

Abstract

Many countries around the world have implemented subsidies for utility consumption, especially in the case of water and electricity. Most subsidies take the form of a lifeline or increasing block tariff, whereby households that consume less pay less on a unit basis. The idea is that households with low consumption levels are likely to be poor, and some intervention is warranted to enable them to meet their basic needs (the lifeline) at an affordable cost. Whether such subsidies are successful at helping the poor is not clear. In this chapter we assess the targeting performance of a similar subsidy for electricity implemented in Honduras. The subsidy is targeted through the lifeline principle; however, because the consumption threshold for eligibility is relatively high (300 kWh per month), and because those with access to electricity tend to be less poor than those without access, the program’s overall performance is low in terms of poverty reduction. Targeting through means-testing rather than a lifeline, or at least a lower threshold for the lifeline, could help improve the impact of the subsidy, and based on experience in other countries, would not necessarily imply high administrative costs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Electricity subsidies; ROC curves; targeting
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue

References

Besley, T., and R. Kanbur, 1996, “The Principles of Targeting”, in M. Lipton and J. Van der Gaag, Editors, Including the Poor, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Clert, C., and Q. Wodon, 2001, “The Targeting of Government Programs in Chile: A Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment”, in Gacitua-Mario, E., and Q. Wodon, Editors, Measurement and Meaning: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for the Analysis of Poverty and Social Exclusion in Latin America, World Bank Technical Paper No. 518, Washington, DC.

Cornia, G. A., and F. Stewart, 1995, “Two Errors of Targeting”, in D. Van de Walle and K. Nead, Editors, Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Coudouel, A., J. Hentschel, and Q. Wodon, 2002, “Poverty Measurement and Analysis”, in J. Klugman, editor, Poverty Reduction Strategies Sourcebook, World Bank, Washington, DC.

Gomez-Lobo, A. and Contreras, D., 2000, “Subsidy Policies for the Utility Industries: A Comparison of the Chilean and Colombian Water Subsidy Schemes”, Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Chile, Santiago de Chile.

ENEE, 2002, “Analisis del subsidio que ortoga el Gobierno Central de Honduras a los Abonados Residenciales con consumos iguales o menores a 300 hWh/mes,” Mimeo, ENEE, Tegucigalpa.

Estache, A., V. Foster, and Q. Wodon, 2002, Accounting for Poverty in Infrastructure Reform: Learning from Latin America’s Experience, World Bank Institute Development Studies, Washington, DC.

Foster, V., and C. Araujo, 2002, A Case Study From Guatemala, in Foster V., and Q. Wodon, editors, Basic Infrastructure, Reform and the Poor: Case Studies from Latin America, World Bank Technical Paper, forthcoming, Washington, DC.

Sen, A., 1995, “The Political Economy of Targeting”, in D. Van de Walle and K. Nead, Editors, Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Wodon Q., 1997, “Targeting the Poor Using ROC Curves”, World Development, 25: 2083-92

World Bank, 2001, Honduras: Poverty Diagnostic 2000, Report No. 20531-HO, Washington, DC.