Bernard, Carole and Ghossoub, Mario (2009): Static Portfolio Choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory.
There is a more recent version of this item available. 

PDF
MPRA_paper_15446.pdf Download (1MB)  Preview 
Abstract
We derive the optimal portfolio choice for an investor who behaves according to Cumulative Prospect Theory. The study is done in a oneperiod economy with one riskfree asset and one risky asset, and the reference point corresponds to the terminal wealth arising when the entire initial wealth is invested into the riskfree asset. When it exists, the optimal holding is a function of a generalized Omega measure of the distribution of the excess return on the risky asset over the riskfree rate. It conceptually resembles Merton’s optimal holding for a CRRA expectedutility maximizer. We derive some properties of the optimal holding and illustrate our results using a simple example where the excess return has a skewnormal distribution. In particular, we show how a Cumulative Prospect Theory investor is highly sensitive to the skewness of the excess return on the risky asset. In the model we adopt, with a piecewisepower value function with diﬀerent shape parameters, loss aversion might be violated for reasons that are now wellunderstood in the literature. Nevertheless, we argue, on purely behavioral grounds, that this violation is acceptable.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Static Portfolio Choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Cumulative Prospect Theory, Portfolio Choice, Behavioral Finance, Omega Measure. 
Subjects:  D  Microeconomics > D8  Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81  Criteria for DecisionMaking under Risk and Uncertainty G  Financial Economics > G1  General Financial Markets > G11  Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions 
Item ID:  15446 
Depositing User:  Mario Ghossoub 
Date Deposited:  01. Jun 2009 07:02 
Last Modified:  14. Feb 2013 10:26 
References:  Abdellaoui, M., H. Bleichrodt, and C. Paraschiv (2007): “Loss Aversion Under Prospect Thepry: A ParameterFree Measurement,” Management Science, 53(10), 1659–1674. Allais, M. (1953): “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Axiomes et Postulats de l’ Ecole Americaine,” Econometrica, 21(4), 503–546. Barberis, N., and M. Huang (2008): “Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices,” American Economic Review, 98(5), 2066–2100. Baucells, M., and F. Heukamp (2006): “Stochastic dominance and cumulative theory,” Management Science, 52(9), 1409–1423. Benartzi, S., and R. Thaler (1995): “Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92. Berkelaar, A., R. Kouwenberg, and T. Post (2004): “Optimal Portfolio Choice Under Loss Aversion,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 973–987. Bernardo, A., and O. Ledoit (2000): “Gain, Loss and Asset Pricing,” Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 144–172. Camerer, C., G. Loewenstein, and M. Rabin (2004): Advances in Behavioral Economics. Princeton University Press. Cascon, A., C. Keating, and W. Shadwick (2003): “The Omega Function,” The Finance Development Centre, Working Paper. Davies, G. B., and S. E. Satchell (2007): “The Behavioural Components of Risk Aversion,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51(1), 1–13. De Giorgi, E., and T. Hens (2006): “Making Prospect Theory Fit for Finance,” Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 20(3), 339–360. De Giorgi, E., T. Hens, and H. Levy (2004): “Existence of CAPM Equilibria with Prospect Theory Preferences,” NCCRFINRISK Working Paper, no. 85, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=420184. De Giorgi, E., T. Hens, and J. Mayer (2006): “A Behavioral Foundation of RewardRisk Portfolio Selection and the Asset Allocation Puzzle,” EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings Paper, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=899273. De Giorgi, E., T. Hens, and M. Rieger (2008): “Financial Market Equilibria with Cumulative Prospect Theory,” Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, no. 0721, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=985539. Denneberg, D. (1994): NonAdditive Measure and Integral. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Edwards, W. (1962): “Subjective Probabilities Inferred from Decisions,” Psychological Review, 69(2), 109–135. Eeckhoudt, L., C. Gollier, and H. Schlesinger (2005): Economic and Financial Decisions under Risk. Princeton University Press. Ellsberg, D. (1961): “Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643–669. Fellner, W. (1961): “Distortion of Subjective Probabilities as a Reaction to Uncertainty,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 670–689. Fishburn, P. (1988): Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Genton, M. (2004): SkewEl liptical Distributions and Their Applications: A Journey Beyond Normality. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Gollier, C. (1996): “Optimum Insurance of Approximate Losses,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, 63(3), 369–380. Gollier, C. (2001): The Economics of Risk and Time. The MIT Press. Gomes, F. (2005): “Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with LossAverse Investors,” Journal of Business, 78(2), 675–706. Handa, J. (1977): “Risk, Probabilities and a New Theory of Cardinal Utility,” Journal of Political Economy, 85(1), 97–122. Jarrow, R., and F. Zhao (2006): “Downside Loss Aversion and Portfolio Management,” Management Science, 52(4), 558–566. Jin, H., and X. Y. Zhou (2008): “Behavioral Portfolio Selection in Continous Time,” Mathematical Finance, 18(3), 385–426. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky (1979): “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. Keating, C., and W. Shadwick (2002): “A Universal Performance Measure,” Journal of Performance Measurement, 6(3), 59–84. Kobberling, V., and P. Wakker (2005): “An Index of Loss Aversion,” Journal of Economic Theory, 122(1), 119–131. Merton, R. (1969): “Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The ContinuousTime Case,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51(3), 247–257. Neilson, W. S. (2002): “Comparative Risk Sensitivity with ReferenceDependent Preferences,” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24(2), 131– 142. Quiggin, J. (1982): “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior, 3(4), 323–343. Schmeidler, D. (1986): “Integral Representation without Additivity,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 97(2), 255–261. Schmeidler, D. (1989): “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity,” Econometrica, 57(3), 571–587. Schmidt, U., and H. Zank (2005): “What is Loss Aversion?,” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(2), 157–167. Schmidt, U., and H. Zank (2007): “Linear Cumulative Prospect Theory with Applications to Portfolio Selection and Insurance Demand,” Decisions in Economics and Finance, 30, 1–18. Starmer, C. (2000): “Developments in NonExpected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk,” Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 332–382. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman (1992): “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. Wakker, P. (1994): “Separating Marginal Utility and Probabilistic Risk Aversion,” Theory and Decision, 36(1), 1–44. Wakker, P., and A. Tversky (1993): “An Axiomatization of Cumulative Prospect Theory,” The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7(7), 147–176. Wang, S., and V. Young (1998): “Ordering Risks: Expected Utility Theory versus Yaari’s Dual Theory of Risk,” Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 22, 145–161. Yaari, M. (1987): “The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk,” Econometrica, 55(1), 95–115. Zank, H. (2009): “On Probabilities and Loss Aversion,” Theory and Decision  Forthecoming. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/15446 
Available Versions of this Item
 Static Portfolio Choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory. (deposited 01. Jun 2009 07:02) [Currently Displayed]