The Whole Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts - Or Is It? A Review of the Empirical Literature on Complementarities in Organizations

Ennen, Edgar and Richter, Ansgar (2009): The Whole Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts - Or Is It? A Review of the Empirical Literature on Complementarities in Organizations.

Abstract

The concept of complementarity and its role in the design of organizations has enjoyed increasing attention over the past twenty years. We provide a systematic review of the empirical studies on complementarities in leading journals in management, economics and related disciplines that considers the nature of the factors among which complementarities are found to exist, and the effects of complementarities in organizations. Our findings suggest that complementarities result from the skilful matching of heterogeneous resources which generate positive returns above and beyond the effect of each resource generated on its own. In contrast, the empirical evidence on complementarities between individual organizational and HR practices in firms provides mixed conclusions. We show that complementarities are likely to materialize in complex systems of multiple design elements. Therefore, future research should aim at uncovering complementary effects among multiple elements that capture organizational systems better than a few selected elements only do.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Complementarities; Organizational Design
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

References

Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19 (3): 475-492.

Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18 (5): 763-780.

Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1990). Complementarity and external linkages: The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (4): 361-379.

Athey, S., Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1998). Robust Comparative Statics. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.

Athey, S., & Stern, S. (1998). An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. (NBER Working Paper No. 6600). Cambridge, MA.

Athey, S., & Stern, S. (2002). The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. RAND Journal of Economics, 33 (3): 399-432.

Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24 (1): 45-68.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2006). Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, 28 (4): 401-426.

Bendoly, E., Citurs, A., & Konsynski, B. (2007). Internal infrastructural impacts on RFID perceptions and commitment: Knowledge, operational procedures, and informationprocessing standards. Decision Sciences, 38 (3): 423-449.

Bertschek, I., & Kaiser, U. (2004). Productivity effects of organizational change: Microeconomic evidence. Management Science, 50 (3): 394-404.

Bin, G. (2008). Technology acquisition channels and industry performance: An industrylevel of Chinese large- and medium-size manufacturing enterprises. Research Policy, 37 (2): 194-209.

Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2001). How to compete: The impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83 (3): 434-445.

Bocquet, R., Brossard, O., & Sabatier, M. (2007). Complementarities in organizational design and the diffusion of information technologies: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 36 (3): 367-368.

Bonaccorsi, A., & Thoma, G. (2007). Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research Policy, 36 (6): 813-831.

Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm level evidence. Ouarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1): 339-376.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2003). Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85 (4): 793-808.

Brynjolfsson, E., Renshaw, A. A., & Van Alstyne, M. (1997). The matrix of change. Sloan Management Review, 38 (2): 37-54.

Capelli, P., & Neumark, D. (2001). Do "High-Performance" work practices improve establishment-level outcomes? Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 54 (4): 737-775.

Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2004). The relationship between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (13): 1257- 1278.

Cassiman, B., Colombo, M. G., Garrone, P., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and marketrelatedness. Research Policy, 34 (2): 195-220.

Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52 (1): 68-82.

Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: An empirical investigation using a systems approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23 (3): 243-264.

Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. (2008). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity based theory approach. Omega, 36 (2): 235-251.

Christman, P. (2000). Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4): 663-680.

Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (2001). Publicly funded Science and the productivity of the pharmaceutical industry. NBER Innovation Policy & Economy, 1 (1): 1-34.

Colombo, M. G., Grilli, L., & Piva, E. (2006). In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 35 (8): 1166- 1199.

Colombo, M. G., & Mosconi, R. (1995). Complementarity and cumulative learning effects in the early diffusion of multiple technologies. Journal of Industrial Economics, 43 (1): 13-48.

Cozzarin, B. P., & Percival, J. C. (2006). Complementarities between organisational strategies and innovation. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 15 (3): 195-217.

Cremers, K. J., & Nair, V. R. (2005). Governance mechanisms and equity prices. The Journal of Finance, 60 (6): 2859-2894.

Delaney, J. T., & Huselid, M. A. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4): 949-969.

Edgeworth, F. Y. (1881). Mathematical physics: An essay on the application of mathematics to the moral sciences. London: Kegan Paul. Englert, B. G., Scully, M. O., & Walther, H. (1991). Quantum optical tests of complementarity. Nature, 351: 111-116.

Galia, F., & Legros, D. (2004). Complementarities between obstacles of innovation: Evidence from France. Research Policy, 33 (8): 1185-1199. 30Gao, L. S., & Iyer, B. (2006). Analysing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisition. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23 (2): 119- 147.

Gates, S., Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1996). Complementarities in the transition from socialism: A firm-level analysis. In J. McMillian, & B. Naughton (Eds.); Reforming asian socialism: The Growth of market institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Grandori, A., & Furnari, S. (2008). A chemistry of organization: Combinatory Analysis and Design. Organization Studies, 29 (3): 459-485.

Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (5): 339-360.

Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1997). Information technology and internal firm organization: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (2): 81-101.

Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (2007). Buiding theoretical end empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6): 1385-1399.

Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. (2006). The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 1137-1157.

Horgan, J., & Mühlau, P. (2006). Human resource systems and employee performance in Ireland and the Netherlands: A test of the complementarity hypothesis. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17 (3): 414-439.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (1995). Old dogs and new tricks: Determinants of the adoption of productivity-enhancing work practices. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995 Special Issue Microeconomics: 1-65.

Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2003). Beyond incentive pay: Insiders' estimates of the vaue of complementary human resource management practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1): 155-180.

Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., & Prennushi, G. (1997). The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review, 87 (3): 291-313.

Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The role of information system resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information System, 24 (2): 221-260.

Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

King, D. R., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Kesner, I. (2008). Performance implications of firm resource interactions in the acquisition of R&D-intensive firms. Organization Science, 19 (2): 327-340.

Kirkman, B., & Law, K. (2005). International management research in AMJ: Our past, present, and future. Academy of Management Journal, 48 (3): 377-386.

Lachmann, L. (1947). Complementarity and substitution in the theory of capital. Economica, 14 (54): 108-119.

Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and their impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27 (2): 243-264.

Lee, J. J.-Y. (2008). Complementary effects of information technology investment on firm profitability: The functional form of the complementarities. Information Systems Management, 25 (4): 364-371.

Levinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43 (7): 934- 950.

Levinthal, D. A., & Warglien, M. (1999). Landscape design: Designing for local action in complex worlds. Organization Science, 10 (3): 342-357.

MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48 (2): 197-221.

Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between 'high-performance work practices' and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects. Internation Journal of Human Resource Management, 18 (4): 537-567.

Matsuyama, K. (1995). Complemetarities and cumulative processes in models of monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Literature, 33 (2): 701-729.

Milgrom, P., Qian, Y., & Roberts, J. (1991). Complementarities, momentum and the evolution of modern manufacturing. American Economic Review, 81 (2): 84-88.

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990a). The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review, 80 (3): 511-528.

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990b). Rationalizability, learning and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities. Econometrics, 58 (6): 1255-1277.

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1994). Complementarities and systems: Understanding Japanese economic organization. Estudios Economicos, 9 (1): 3-42.

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995a). Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19 (2-3): 179-208.

Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995b). Continuous adjustment and fundamental change in business strategy and organization. In H. Siebert (Ed.): Trends in business organization: Do participation and cooperation increase cooperativeness? (pp. 231-258). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

Miller, D. (1988). Relating Porter's business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance imlications. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 280-308.

Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). Human capital and institutional effects in the compensation of information technology professionals in the united states. Management Science, 54 (3): 415-428.

Ng, D. (2003). The social structure of organizational change and performance. Emergence, 5 (1): 99-119.

Porter, M., & Siggelkow, N. (2008). Contextuality within activity systems and sustainability of competitive advantage. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22 (2): 34-56.

Raff, D. (2000). Superstores and the evolution of firm capabilities in american bookselling. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1043-1059.

Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes and moderators. Journal of Management, 34 (3): 375-409.

Ravinchandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21 (4): 237-276.

Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46 (2): 824-844.

Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003). Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Science, 49 (3): 290-311.

Roberts, J. (2004). The modern firm: Organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roper, S., Du, J., & Love, J. H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37: 961-977.

Rothaermel, F. (2001a). Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent's advantage: An empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30: 1235-1251.

Rothaermel, F. (2001b). Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 687-699.

Rothaermel, F., & Boeker, W. (2008). Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (1): 47-77.

Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18 (6): 898-921. 38

Rothaermel, F., & Hill, C. W. (2005). Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance. Organization Science, 16 (1): 52-70.

Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the german manufacturing sector. Research Policy, 37 (9): 1492-1503.

Schultze, U., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2004). A practice-perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of internet-based self-serv technologies. Information Systems Research, 15 (1): 87-106.

Siggelkow, N. (2001). Change in the presence of fit: The rise, the fall, and the renaissance of Liz Claiborne. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4): 838-857.

Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. W. (2005). Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science, 16 (2): 101-122.

Somaya, D., Williamson, I. O., & Zhang, X. (2007). Combining patent law expertise with R&D for patenting performance. Organization Science, 18 (6): 922-937.

Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (3): 259-276.

Swink, M., & Nair, A. (2006). Capturing the competitive advantages of AMT: Designmanufacturing integration as a complementary asset. Journal of Operations Management, 25 (3): 736-754.

Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29 (2): 311-334.

Tanriverdi, H. (2006). Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 30 (1): 57-77.

Tanriverdi, H., & Lee, C. H. (2008). Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (2): 381-397.

Tanriverdi, H., & Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2): 97-119.

Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33 (3): 261-289.

Tether, B., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37 (6/7): 1079-1095.

Tiwana, A. (2008a). Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (3): 251-272.

Tiwana, A. (2008b). Does interfirm modularity complement ignorance? A field study of software outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (11): 1241-1252.

Tiwana, A., & Keil, M. (2007). Does peripheral knowledge complement control? An empirical test in technology outsourcing alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (6): 623-634.

Topkis, D. L. (1978). Mimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Operations Research, 26 (2): 305-321.

Topkis, D. L. (1987). Activity optimization games with complementarity. European Journal of Operations Research, 28 (3): 358-368.

Tzabbar, D., Aharonson, B. S., Amburgey, T. L., & Al-Laham, A. (2008). When is the whole bigger than the sum of its parts? Bundling knowledge stocks for innovative success. Strategic Organization, 6 (4): 375-408.

White, S. (2000). Competition, capabilities, and the make, buy, or ally decisions of Chinese state owned firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (3): 324-341.

Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, S., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A european panel study, 1992-1996. Organization Science, 10 (5): 583-600.

Wright, M., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. (2008). Returnee entrepreneurs, science park location choice and performance: An analysis of high-technology SMEs in china. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32 (1): 131-155.

Zhu, K. (2004). The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and ecommerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. Journal of Management, 21 (1): 167-202.

Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (1): 1-26