A tango tale: on the closure of the Argentine fully funded system

Ferro, Gustavo and Castagnolo, Fermando (2009): A tango tale: on the closure of the Argentine fully funded system.

Abstract

With an early welfare system, Argentina’s demography is more similar to the South European countries than to the majority of Latin American ones. The country reformed its old fashioned Pay-As-You-Go system in the 1990s, introducing a Fully Funded scheme, which was intended to solve the financial stress of the social security, as well as to yield positive externalities on the financial system, the savings rate and economic growth. After 15 years of functioning, the system was closed, their affiliates sent to Pay-As-You-Go again, and the accumulated savings went to the public social security administration, which is in charge of future benefits. The official explanation for such an ending was that the international financial crisis was a peril for future pensioners, and also that the (private) pension funds administrators were not the proper managers of the funds. In the Congress, the political majorities for this reform were remarkable strong in both chambers. Protests of the saving accounts owners were not loud, in a country with a tradition of mass demonstrations. How it happened? Why? Did pension fund administrators work properly for their affiliates, given the constraints they faced? Can we learn some lessons, relevant to other countries with similar characteristics (i.e., Latin American, Eastern European or Central Asian), besides the uniqueness of the local circumstances? We think so, and we worked on developing the lessons of this experience. We debate on the process and we asked if it could occur in some other place. We conclude that it can, since weak political consensus on the reform is built. It also could happen when the objectives and the instruments are not properly differentiated. Are we in search of fixing the social security or of promoting national savings? Also, the marketing and the counter marketing of the reform could polarize the debate, and to difficult the per se complex consensus. Finally, the counter reform has unexpected pay- offs, since making implicit the public debt due to the social security system, and the sudden disposal of a source of resources to finance the State budget increases the appeal of eliminating the Fully Funded scheme. The long run responses of the ageing process and the short run political horizon add up to the counter reform coalition.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Pension Funds; Argentina; Reform; Portfolio regulation
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions ; Financial Instruments ; Institutional Investors

References

AIOS (2007). La capitalización individual en los sistemas provisionales de América Latina. Asociación Internacional de Organismos de Supervisión de Fondos de Pensión, diciembre.

Barr, Nicholas (2006). Pensions: Overview of the Issues. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol 22, N° 1. Oxford University Press.

Barr, Nicholas (2000). Reforming Pensions: Myths, Truths, and Policy Choices. International Monetary Fund Working Paper 00/139.

Castagnolo, Fernando (2008). Pérdida de valor en las carteras de AFJP. ¿Hubiera podido evitarse con otras regulaciones de conducta? Trabajo de Investigación Final, Licenciatura en Finanzas. UADE, Buenos Aires.

CEPAL (2006). La protección social de cara al futuro. Acceso, financiamiento y solidaridad. XXXI Período de sesiones de la CEPAL. Montevideo, marzo.

Chisari, Omar and Gustavo Ferro (2005). Macroeconomic shocks and regulatory dilemmas: The affordability and sustainability constraints and the Argentine default experience. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 45, Issues 2-3, May.

Ferro, Gustavo (2004a). “La discusión sobre los sistema previsionales: últimas tendencias pensando en Iberoamérica ¿Capitalización a la chilena o sistemas de cuentas nocionales suecas?” In Organización Iberoamericana de la Seguridad Social: “III Premio OISS 50 Aniversario. 50 Años de Seguridad Social en Iberoamérica. Una referencia para su desarrollo en el Siglo XXI”. OISS, Madrid.

Ferro, Gustavo (2004b). “Sistema previsional de capitalización en Argentina: diez años de operación y reflexiones en torno a incentivos y funcionamiento,” In XXXIX Anales of the Asociación Argentina de Economía Política (AAEP). Buenos Aires, November.

Ferro, Gustavo and Carlos Romero (2008). “Macroeconomic Crisis and Private Funds Efficiency: The Case of Argentina”. In “Social Protection in an Aging World”, edited by Peter Kemp, Karel Van Der Bosch and Lindsey Smith. Published by Intersentia (Serie 'International Studies of Social Security' Vol 13), Antwerp, Belgium.

FIEL (2005). El sistema de jubilaciones en la Argentina. Un impacto de la reforma y el impacto del default. Fundación de Investigaciones Económicas Latinoamericanas.

Fox, Louise and Edward Palmer (2001). Pension Reform in Europe in the 90’s and Lessons For Latin America. Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo 114. CEPAL. Santiago, November.

Gill, Indermit, Truman Packard and Juan Yermo, with the assistance of Todd Pugach (2004). Keeping the Promise of Old Age Income Security in Latin America. A Regional Study of Social Security Reform. Regional Studies Program, The Office of the Chieff Economist, Latin America and Caribbean Region. The World Bank.

Holzmann, Robert and Richard Hinz (2005). Soporte del ingreso en la vejez en el siglo veintiuno. Una perspectiva internacional de los sistemas de pensiones y de sus reformas. The World Bank.

Mesa-Lago, Carmelo (2004 b). Las reformas de pensiones en América Latina y su impacto en los principios de la seguridad social. Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo N° 144. CEPAL. Santiago, marzo.