Reggiani, Tommaso (2009): How to Reform the Italian Domestic Adoptions System Through a Centralized Market Design.
Download (210kB) | Preview
Using an innovative variation of the standard Matching Market Design framework, this draft aims to provide inputs useful to drive the reform of the current Italian Domestic Adoption System (Italian families that desire to adopt an Italian child). The problem addressed in this draft, concern how to match the relative small number of waiting children to the large number of waiting families in the most rational and efficient way: each year, the adoptions system is not able to place the 20% of the children in foster care, despite the fact that the number of children (supply side) is very small respect the total amount of families (demand side) willing to adopt. This project is oriented to solve the inefficiencies characterizing the current adoption program, substituting the actual decentralized setup with a more efficient centralized matching market criteria
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||How to Reform the Italian Domestic Adoptions System Through a Centralized Market Design|
|Keywords:||Matching Market Design, Adoptions System, Matching Algorithm|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory|
|Depositing User:||TOMMASO REGGIANI|
|Date Deposited:||16. Jul 2009 14:02|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 03:48|
Balding (2009) A Modest Proposal for a Two Sided Market Clearing Institution Under Asymmetric Supply Constraints With Skewed Pricing: The Market for Adoption and Abortion in the United States, Mimeo, URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1324336
Blackstone and Hakim (2003), A Market Alternative to Child Adoption and Foster Care, Cato Journal,(winter), 485-494.
Blackstone, Buck and Hakim (2004), Privatizing Adoption and Foster Care: Applying Auction and Market Solutions, Children and Youth Services Review}, 26, 1033-1049.
Blackstone, Buck, Hakim and Spiegel (2008), Market Segmentation in Child Adoption, International Review of Law and Economics, 28, 2008, 220-225.
Fadiga (2003), Adozione, Il Mulino, Bologna, 2003 (2nd Ed.)
Hansen (2007), Using Private Contracts to Create Adoptions from Foster Care, WP. n. 2007-03 - Department of Economics, American University Washington, April 2007.
Hansen and Hansen (2006), An Economic Analysis of the Adoption of Children from Foster Care,Child Welfare, 85-3(May/June 2006), 559-583.
Ichino Pellizzi and Zevola (2002), Affido Familiare e Adozione, Hoepli, Milano, 2002 (2nd Ed.)
ISTAT (2006), Le Coppie che Chiedono Adozione di un Bambino, Sistema Informativo Istat, URL: http://www.istat.it/dati/dataset/20060118\_00
Kagel and Roth (2000), The Dynamics of Reorganization in Matching Markets: A Laboratory Experiment Motivated by a Natural Experiment,Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 2000, 201-235.
Landes and Posner (1978), The Economics of the Baby Shortage, Journal of Legal Studies, 7(June), 323-348.
Roth and Peranson (1999), The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design, American Economic Review, 89, 4, September, 1999, 748-780.
Roth (1996), Report on the Design and Testing of an Applicant Proposing Matching Algorithm and Comparison with the Existing NRMP Algorithm (Consultant's report), Mimeo, URL: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/~aroth/phasel.html
Smith and Howard (1991), A Comparative Study of Successful and Disrupted Adoptions, Social Service Review, 65, 1992, 248-265.
Ward (1997), Family Paradigms and Older-Child Adoption: A Proposal for Matching Parents' Strengths to Children's Needs, Family Relations, Vol. 46, No. 3 (Jul., 1997), 257-262.