Ollivier, TO (2009): The usefulness of aggregate sustainability indicators for policy making: What do they say for Madagascar?
Download (210kB) | Preview
In this paper we compare the practical policy implications that can be derived from the calculation of three aggregate sustainability indicators for Madagascar. The chosen indicators are: the Adjusted Net Saving, the Genuine Progress Indicator, and the Ecological Footprint. Our results are twofold. First, these indicators provide very different messages regarding the sustainability of Madagascar’s recent development. The first one indicates a development path that is not sustainable, whereas the latter two do not indicate anything to be alarmed about. Second, they yield a set of widely diverse policy implications which we do not see as complementary. The Ecological Footprint provides policy recommendations that are too general for poor countries rich in natural resources, such as Madagascar. The Genuine Progress Indicator highlights several social issues but its interpretation in terms of sustainability remains ambiguous as it is a mix between a present welfare and a sustainability indicator. In the end, we consider that the Adjusted Net Saving provides the most consistent information to decision makers regarding the sustainability of Madagascar’s recent development path.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The usefulness of aggregate sustainability indicators for policy making: What do they say for Madagascar?|
|Keywords:||Sustainable Development, Madagascar, Ecological Footprint, Adjusted Net Saving, Genuine Progress Indicator|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development
|Depositing User:||Timothée Ollivier|
|Date Deposited:||10. Aug 2009 07:23|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 14:46|
Andrianjaka, N.H., 2001. Valeur économique des produits forestiers autres que les bois. Cas de la région d'Ambohitantely. CFSIGE, Université d’Antananarivo, PAGE, Ilo Program Working Paper.
Arrow, K.J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L.H., Mumford, K., Oleson, K., 2007. China, the U.S., and sustainability: Perspectives Based on Comprehensive Wealth. Working Paper Stanford University.
Atkinson, G., Hamilton, K., 2007. Progress along the Path: Evolving Issues in the measurement of genuine saving. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37: 43-61.
Charmes J., 2005, Femmes africaines, activités économiques et travail: de l’invisibilité à la reconnaissance. Tiers-Monde, XLVI, 182, 255-279.
Clarke, M., Lawn, P., 2008. A policy analysis of Victoria's Genuine Progress Indictor. Journal of Socio-Economics. 37, 864-879.
Cobb, J., Daly, H., 1989. For the common good. Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment and a sustainable future. Beacon press, Boston.
Cobb, C., Cobb, J., 1994. The green national product: a proposed index of sustainable economic welfare. University of America press, Washington D.C.
Drechsel, P., Gyiele, L.A., 1999. The Economic Assessment of Soil nutrient depletion. Analytical issues for framework development. International Board for Soil Research and Management Issues in Sustainable Land Management 7.
Ferreira S., Hamilton, K., Vincent, J.R., 2008, Comprehensive Wealth and Future Consumption: Accounting for Population Growth. The World Bank Economic Review, 22, 233-248.
Fiala, N., 2008. Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecol. Econ. 67, 519-525.
lobal Footprint Network, 2006 Global Footprint Network, Africa Factbook. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/africa (2006).
Global Footprint Network, 2008 Global Footprint Network, Africa Factbook. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/africa (2008).
Gnegne, Y., 2009. Adjusted net saving and welfare change. Ecol. Econ. 68, 1127-1139.
Kitzes, J., Moran, D., Galli, A., Wackernagel, M., 2009. Interpretation and application of the Ecological Footprint: A reply to Fiala (2008). Ecol. Econ. 68, 929-930.
Hanley, N., Mofatt, I., Faichney, R., Wilson, M., 1999. Measuring sustainability: a time series of alternative indicators for Scotland. Ecological Economics 28, 55–73.
Hamilton, C., 1997. The Genuine Progress Indicator. A new Index of changes in well-being in Australia. Discussion Paper Number 14. The Australia Institute.
Hamilton, K., Clemens, M. 1999. Genuine Savings Rates in Developing Countries. World Bank Economic Review 13: 333-356.
Hamilton, K., 2005. Testing Genuine Saving. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3577.
Hamilton, K., Withagen, C., 2007. Savings Growth and the Path of Utility. Canadian Journal of Economics 40:2, 703-713.
Harris, M., 2007. On income, sustainability and the 'microfoundations' of the Genuine Progress Indicator. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 3: 119-131.
Hartwick, J.M., 1977. Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources. American Economic Review 67(5):972-974.
Holling, C.S., 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics 4: 1-23.
Lawn, A.P., 2003. A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. Ecological Economics, 44: 105–118.
Lawn, P., 2004. Response to William J. Mates' paper: income, investment, and sustainability. Ecological Economics 48: 5–7.
Meyers, D., Ramamonjisoa, B., Sève, J., Rajafindramanga, M., Burren, C., 2006. Etude sur la consommation et la production en produits forestiers ligneux à Madagascar. USAID, IRG, Antananarivo.
Muradian, R., 2001. Ecological Thresholds: a survey. Ecological Economics, 38: 7-24.
Neumayer, E., 1999. The ISEW: Not an index of sustainable economic welfare. Social Indicators Research, 48: 77-101.
Neumayer, E., 2003. Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
Neumayer, E., (2004). Sustainability and well-being indicators. United Nations University — World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) Research Paper 23/2004.
Nordhaus, W. and Tobin, J., 1972. Is growth obsolete? In the measurement of economic and social performance, studies in income and wealth, national bureau of economic research, vol.38.
Nordhaus, W.D., Boyer, J., 2000. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nourry, M., 2008. Measuring sustainable development: Some empirical evidence for France from eight alternative indicators, Ecol. Econ. 67, 441-456.
Pezzey, J., Toman, M.A., 2005. Sustainability and its economic interpretations. in R.D. Simpson, M.A. Toman and
R.U. Ayres, eds., Scarcity and Growth: Natural Resources and the Environment in the New Millennium, 121-141. Washington D.C.: RFF Press.
Rees, W.E., 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanisation 4 (2): 121–130.
Solow, R.M., 1974. Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources. Review of Economic Studies, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, 29-46.
Siche, J.R., Agostinho, F., Ortega, E., Romeiro, A., 2008. Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices. 66, 628-637.
Stoorvogel, J.J., Smaling, E.M.A., Stoorvogel, J.J.S., 1990. Assessment of soil nutrient depletion in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1983-2000. Report 28. Wageningen, Winand Staring Centre.
Talberth, J., Cobb, C., Slattery, N., 2007. The Genuine Progress Indicator 2006. A tool for sustainable development. Redefining Progress, www.rprogress.org.
Tol, R.S., 2005. The Marginal Damage Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment of Uncertainties. Energy Policy, 33: 2064-2074.
Van den Bergh, J., Verbrugen, H., 1999. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ecological footprint. Ecol. Econ. 29: 61-72
Wackernagel, M., 1994. Ecological Footprint and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: A Tool for Planning Toward Sustainability. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Community and Regional Planning. The University of British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada. Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W., 1995, Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New society publishers, The new catalyst bioregional series, Gabriola island BC. World Bank, 2005. World Development Indicators 2005, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. World Health Organization, 2002. Global Burden of Diseases. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/ World Health Organization, 2007. Indoor Air Pollution: National Burden of Disease Estimates. WHO, Geneva.