Marini, Marco A. (2005): The value of a new idea: knowledge transmission, workers' mobility and market structure. Published in: Chaos, Solitons and Fractals , Vol. 29, No. 29, 2006 (2006): pp. 697-706.
Download (251kB) | Preview
We model the process of knowledge transmission among ﬁrms via workers mobility as a multi-stage game. In our setup an idea to be realized needs that the agent informed about the idea recruits another agent from a pool of uninformed people. This constraint generates a recursive eﬀect of knowledge transmission via players mobility across ﬁrms which aﬀects simultaneously the players payoﬀs and the number of active players engaged in market competition. We provide suﬃcient conditions for the game to possess a unique symmetric subgame perfect equilibrium in which all incumbent players deter the exit of their collaborators. The equilibrium outcome is shown to depend upon the success of the idea over time, expressed by the behaviour of the market demand and on playerstime preferences. A few other intuitions are provided on the interplay between technology, market structure and the market value of an innovative idea.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Faculty of Economics, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo"|
|Original Title:||The value of a new idea: knowledge transmission, workers' mobility and market structure|
|Keywords:||Innovation; Workers’ Mobility; Knowledge Transmission; Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium; Recursive Games|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General
L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
|Depositing User:||Marco A. Marini|
|Date Deposited:||07. Feb 2007|
|Last Modified:||26. Apr 2015 15:24|
Anton J, Yao D. Expropriation and inventions. Amer Econ Rev 1994:190–209. Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In: Nelson, editor. The rate and direction of inventive activity. New York: Princeton University Press; 1962. Baccara M, Razin R. From thought to practice: appropriation and endogenous market structure with imperfect intellectual property rights, Mimeo, New York University, 2002. Beser SM, Raskind LJ. An introduction to the law and economics of intellectual property. J Econ Perspect 1991:51. Callon M. La science et ses re´seaux. Paris: La De´couverte; 1989. Carnoy M, Castells, Benner C. Labour market and employment practises in the age of ﬂexibility: a case study in silicon valley. Int Labour Rev 1997;136(1). Cheung S. Property rights in trade secrets. Econ Inquiry 1992. Feinstein JS, Stein J. Employee opportunism and redundancy in ﬁrms. J Econ Behav Organization 1988;10:4. Cooper DP. Innovation and reciprocal externalities: information transmission via job mobility. J Econ Behav Organization 2001; 45:403–25. Dodgson M. Learning, trust and technological collaboration. Human Relat 1993;46:7794. Fisk C. Working knowledge: the employment relationship and corporate ownership of intellectual property, 1800–1930, Mimeo, Loyola University, 2001. Gilson RJ. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial silicon valley, route 128, and covenantes not to compete, NYU Law Review, vol. 74, 2000. Hyde A. Working in silicon valley: economic and legal analysis of a high-velocity labor market, Mimeo, 2000. Levin RC, Klevorick AK, Nelson RR, Winter SG. Appropriating the returns from industrial R & D. Brooking Papers Econ Activity 1987:783–820. MacLeod WB, Malcomson JM. Reputation and hierarchy in dynamic models of employment. J Political Econ 1988;96:832–54. Mailath G, Postlewaite A. Bargaining over the ﬁrm value. Rev Econ Stud 1990;57:367–90. Pakes A, Nitzan S. Optimum contracts for research personnel, research employment, and the establishment of ‘‘rival’’ enterprises. J Labor Econ 1983;1(4):345–65. Perotti R. Entrepreneurs and ideas, Mimeo, University of Amsterdam, 2003. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press; 1994. Rajan RG, Zingales L. The ﬁrm as a dedicated hierarchy: a theory of the origin and growth of ﬁrms. Quart J Econ 2001:116. Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: George Bell & Sons; 1776. Stole LA, Zwiebel J. Organizational design and technology choice under intra-ﬁrm bargaining. Amer Econ Rev 1996;86(1): 195–221. Stole LA, Zwiebel J. Intra-ﬁrm bargaining under non-binding contracts. Rev Econ Stud 1997;3:375–410. Wolinsky A. A theory of the ﬁrm with non binding employment contracts. Econometrica 2000:69. Zabojnik J. A theory of trade secrets in ﬁrms. Int Econ Rev 2002:43.