Goo, Siwei and Siregar, Reza Y. Siregar (2009): Economic Shocks and Exchange Rate as a Shock Absorber in Indonesia and Thailand.
Download (572kB) | Preview
This study investigates the requirement for the exchange rate to be a shock absorber in Indonesia and Thailand from 1986 to 2007. In general, we find that the economic shocks have predominantly been asymmetric relative to the US and the Japanese economies. Yet, the weights attached to the US dollar remain respectably high in the exchange rate management of the rupiah and the baht, in particular for the latter currency, during the post-1997 crisis. Hence, relinquishing the role of exchange rate as a shock absorber has been costly during both the pre-and the post-1997 crisis periods for these Southeast Asian countries. Furthermore, it is arguably more costly for Thailand during the post-1997, and for Indonesia during the pre-1997 crisis.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economic Shocks and Exchange Rate as a Shock Absorber in Indonesia and Thailand|
|Keywords:||Economic Shocks; Shock Absorber; Exchange Rate; Structural Vector Autoregression; Indonesia; Thailand|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes
F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange
|Depositing User:||Reza Yamora Siregar|
|Date Deposited:||21. Aug 2009 09:13|
|Last Modified:||14. Feb 2013 01:44|
Artis, M., Ehrmann, M.,2000. The exchange rate – A shock absorber of source of shocks? A study of four open economies. European University Institute Working Papers RSC No. 2000/38.
Artis, M., Ehrmann, M., 2006. The exchange rate - A shock-absorber or source of shocks? A study of four open economies. Journal of International Money and Finance 25(6), 874-893.
Baig, T., 2001. Characterizing exchange rate regimes in post-crisis East Asia. IMF Working Paper WP/01/152.
Berg, A. G., Jarvis, C. J., Stone, M. R., Zanello, A., 2003. Re-establishing credible nominal anchors after a financial crisis: A review of recent experience. IMF Working Paper WP/03/76.
Bernanke, B. S., Mihov, I., 1998. Measuring monetary policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3), 869-902. Blanchard, O., Quah, D., 1989. The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review 79(4), 655-673.
Bowman, C., 2005, Yen bloc or koala bloc? Currency relationships after the East Asian crisis, Japan and the World Economy 17, pp.83-96.
Chang, R., Valesco, A., 2000. Exchange rate policy for developing countries. American Economic Review 90(2), Papers and Proceedings of the 112th Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May, 71-75.
Chadha, B., Prasad, E., 1996. Real exchange rate fluctuations and the business cycle: Evidence from Japan. IMF Working Paper WP/96/132.
Clarida, R., Gali, J., 1994. Sources of real exchange rate fluctuations: How important are nominal shocks? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 41, 1-56. Devereux, M.B., 2004. Should the exchange rate be a shock absorber? Journal of International Economics 62, 359-377.
Diaz-Alejandro, C., 1985. Good-bye financial repression, hello financial crash. Journal of Development Economics 19, 1-24.
Eichengreen, B., 1994. International Monetary Arrangements for the 21st Century. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
Fane, G., 2005. Post-crisis monetary and exchange rate policies in Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 41(2), 175-195.
Fung, B. S. C., 2002. A VAR analysis of the effects of monetary policy in East Asia. BIS Working Papers No.119.
Gali, J., 1992. How well does the IS-LM model fit postwar US data? Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(2), 709-738.
Goldfajn, I., Olivares, G., 2001. Can flexible exchange rates still “work” in financially open economies? G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 8, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, January.
Hataiseree, R., 1998. Monetary conditions and monetary policy in small open economies: Empirical results for Thailand under the floating rate regime. Paper presented at the 22nd International Conference on a Macroeconomic Core of an Open Economy for Progressive Industrialisation and Development in Asia in the New Millennium, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lastrapes, W. D., 1992. Sources of fluctuations in real and nominal exchange rates. Review of Economics and Statistics 74(3), 530-539.
McKinnon, R. I., Schnabl, G., 2004. The East Asian dollar standard, fear of floating, and original sin. Review of Development Economics 8(3), 331-360.
Rahmatsyah, T., Rajaguru, G., Siregar, R., 2002. Exchange rate volatility, trade & “fixing for life” in Thailand. Japan and the World Economy 14 (4), 445-470.
Shapiro, M. D., Watson, M. W., 1988. Source of business cycle fluctuations. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 3, 111-148.
Siregar, R., Rajaguru, G., 2005. Sources of variation between the inflation rates of Korea, Thailand and Indonesia during the post-1997 crisis. Journal of Policy Modelling 27(7), 867-884.
Smets, F., 1997. Measuring monetary policy shocks in France, Germany and Italy: The role of the exchange rate. BIS Working Papers No. 42.
Thomas, A., 1997. Is the exchange rate a shock absorber? The case of Sweden. IMF Working Paper WP/97/176.
Wyplosz, C., 2001. How risky is financial liberalization in the developing countries? G-24 Discussion Paper Series No. 14, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, September.