Farmanesh, Amir (2009): Regional dimensions of economic development in Iran: A new economic geography approach.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_16942.pdf Download (613kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper presents a spatial analysis of the regional dimensions of poverty and economic development across provinces of Iran. It offers one of the few estimations made in developing countries using this strand of New Economic Geography (NEG) models and provides a comparison of the results for Iran with those in previously studied developed countries.
The goal of this study is to offer an analysis of the effects of agglomeration and dispersion economies on the patterns of regional economic development in Iran based on the empirical estimation of two of the NEG models. First, it presents an estimation of a Market Potential Function (MPF), in which wages are associated with proximity to consumer markets. Second, it estimates an augmented MPF derived from the Krugman model of economic geography that estimates the importance of transportation costs and economies of scale.
The estimation results suggest that Iran shows a generally good fit to both models, satisfying their specifications. Compared to similar studies of developed countries, Iran shows smaller returns to scale. This might be a result of the nature of the technologies used in the non-farm private sector in Iran, which is less industrial and more traditional. Dispersion and decentralization of industries to achieve lower income inequality between provinces would create a level of loss, but less losses than they would be in Western countries.
The paper also found a significantly and consistently greater effect of market potential on wages in comparison to the effect estimated in similar analyses of other countries. This might be a result of the country relying on an underdeveloped transportation system between provinces in Iran. It is also a highly mountainous and geographically diverse country.
The overall result of this study corroborates the notion of centralization in the Iranian economy. The large wage variations explained by economic geography could cause significant internal migration, beyond that seen in western countries. Indeed, significant internal migration has been observed in Iran in past years.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Regional dimensions of economic development in Iran: A new economic geography approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | New Economic Geography; Spatial agglomeration; Market potential; Market structure; Increasing returns to scale; Transport costs; Iranian economy; Economic development in Iran; Income distribution in the provinces of Iran; Empirical evaluation |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
Item ID: | 16942 |
Depositing User: | Amir Farmanesh |
Date Deposited: | 26 Aug 2009 00:19 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 02:24 |
References: | Axtell, R. L. (2001). Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes. Science, 293(5536), 1818-1820. Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Schramm, M. (2004). The spatial distribution of wages: estimating the Helpman-Hanson model for Germany. Journal of Regional Science, 44(3), 437-466. De Bruyne, K. (2002). The Location of Economic Activity. Is There a Spatial Employment Structure in Belgium? Katholiek University of Leuven. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1999). International technology diffusion: theory and measurement. International Economic Review, 40, 537-570. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, 70, 1741- 1779. Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Garcia Pires, A. J. (2006). Estimating Krugman’s economic geography model for the Spanish regions. Spanish Economic Review, 2006(8), 83-112. Greene, W. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc. Hanson, G. H. (1998). Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. National Bureau of Economic Research. Hanson, G. H. (2005). Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 67, 1-24. Harris, C. (1954). The Market as a factor in the localization of production. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 44, 315-348. Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2004). The Empirics of Agglomeration and Trade. In J. Henderson & J. F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. 4). New York: North Holland. Helpman, E. (1998). The size of regions. In D. Pines, E. Sadka & J. Zilcha (Eds.), Topics in public economics: theoretical and applied analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hummels, D. (1999). Towards a geography of trade costs. University of Chicago. Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70, 950- 959. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483-499. Krugman, P. (1993). On the number and location of cities. European Economic Review, 37, 293-298. Limao, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15, 451- 479. Mion, G. (2004). Spatial externalities and empirical analysis: the case of Italy. Journal of Urban Economics, 56, 97-118. Neary, J. P. (2001). Of Hype and Hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 536-561. Overman, H. G., Redding, S., & Venables, A. J. (2003). The Economic Geography of Trade, Production, and Income: A Survey of Empirics. In E. K. Choi & J. Harrigan (Eds.), Handbook of International Trade (pp. 353-387). Malden: Blackwell. Paluzie Hernandez, E., Pons Novell, J., & Tirado Fabregat, D. A. (2005). Potencial de Mercado y Estructura Espacial de los Salarios en las Regiones Espaolas, 1955-1995. Cuadernos Aragoneses de Economía, 15(1), 17-37. Puga, D. (1999). The rise and fall of regional inequalities. European Economic Review, 43, 303-334. Redding, S., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics, 62, 53-82. Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257-1278. Roos, M. (2001). Wages and market potential in Germany. Jahrb Regional wissensch, 21, 171-195. Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Publishing. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16942 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Regional dimensions of economic development in Iran: A new economic geography approach. (deposited 23 Feb 2009 14:12)
- Regional dimensions of economic development in Iran: A new economic geography approach. (deposited 26 Aug 2009 00:19) [Currently Displayed]