Bernardino, Pedro and Marques, Rui (2009): Academic rankings: an approach to a Portuguese ranking.
Download (137kB) | Preview
The academic rankings are a controversial subject in higher education. However, despite all the criticism, academic rankings are here to stay and more and more different stakeholders use rankings to obtain information about the institutions’ performance. The two most well-known rankings, The Times and the Shanghai Jiao Tong University rankings have different methodologies. The Times ranking is based on peer review, whereas the Shanghai ranking has only quantitative indicators and is mainly based on research outputs. In Germany, the CHE ranking uses a different methodology from the traditional rankings, allowing the users to choose criteria and weights. The Portuguese higher education institutions are performing below their European peers, and the Government believes that an academic ranking could improve both performance and competitiveness between institutions. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the advantages and problems of academic rankings and provide guidance to a new Portuguese ranking.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Academic rankings: an approach to a Portuguese ranking|
|Keywords:||Academic rankings; CHE; higher education; performance evaluation; Portugal; Shanghai; THES|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions
|Depositing User:||Rui Cunha Marques|
|Date Deposited:||15. Sep 2009 00:10|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2015 17:22|
BERNARDINO, P.; MARQUES, R. Comparison of Regulatory Models of Higher Education in Europe. The Portuguese Situation. Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior, Campinas, v.14, n.1, p.53-70, 2009.
BOWDEN, R. Fantasy Higher Education: University and College League Tables. Quality in Higher Education, London, v.6, n.1, p. 41-60, 2000.
CHE.Your Gateway to the University Ranking (German Centre for Higher Education Development), 2007. Available at http://www.daad.de/deutschland/ hochschulen/hochschulranking/06543.en.html. Accessed: 15 June 2008.
CLARK, M. Some Guidelines for Academic Quality Rankings. Higher Education in Europe, London, v. 27, n. 4, p. 443-459, 2002.
DICHEV, I. News or Noise? Estimating the Noise in the U.S News University Rankings, Research in Higher Education, Dordrecht, Netherlands, v. 42, n. 3, p. 237-266, 2001.
DILL, D., SOO, M. Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A Cross-national Analysis of University Ranking Systems. Higher Education, Dordrecht, Netherlands, v. 49, n. 4, p. 495-533, 2005.
DYKE, V. Twenty Years of University Report Cards. Higher Education in Europe, London, v. 30, n. 2, p. 103-125, 2005. ENQA .Quality Assurance of Higher Education in Portugal (European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education), Helsinki, 2006.
HARVEY, L. Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review. Quality in Higher Education, London, v. 14, n.3, p. 187 – 208, 2008.
MARGINSON, S. Global University Rankings: Implications in General and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, London, v. 29, n. 2, p. 131-142, 2007.
MARGINSON, S.; VAN DER WENDE, M. To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education, Amsterdam, v. 11 n. 3/4, p.306-329, 2007.
MEREDITH, M. Why do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of the U.S News and World Report College Rankings. Research in Higher Education, Dordrecht, v. 45, n. 5, p. 443-461, 2008.
MORRISON, H.; MAGENNIS, L.; CAREY, L. Performance Indicators and League Tables: A Call for Standards, Higher Education Quarterly, London, v. 49, n. 2, p. 128-145, 1995. OECD .Reviews of National Policies for Education – Tertiary Educational in Portugal (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), Paris, 2006.
SJTU . Academic Ranking of World Universities 2007 (Shanghai Jiao Tong University), Shanghai, 2007. Available at http://www.arwu.org/rank/2007/ranking2007.htm. Accessed: 21 May 2008.
STELLA, A.; WOODHOUSE, D. Ranking of Higher Education Institutions (Australian Universities Quality Agency - AUQA), Melbourne, 2006. TAYLOR, P.; BRADDOCK, R. International University Ranking Systems and the Idea of University Excellence. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, London, v. 29, n. 3, p. 245 – 260, 2007.
THES. World University Rankings 2007 (Times Higher Education Supplement), London, 2007. Available at http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/hybrid.asp?typeCode=142&pubCode=1&navcode=118. Accessed: 23 May 2008.
UNESCO-CEPES . Berlin Principles on Rankings of Higher Education Institutions (European Centre for Higher Education), Berlin, 2006.