Output growth and the variability of exports and imports growth: international evidence from Granger causality tests

Afxentiou, Panos and Serletis, Apostolos (2000): Output growth and the variability of exports and imports growth: international evidence from Granger causality tests. Published in: The Developing Economies , Vol. 38, No. 2 (2000): pp. 141-163.

Abstract

Economic development was from the very beginning the focus of classical political economy and presently retains its original human welfare mission and intellectual attraction through insightful anthropological, sociological, and historical investigations.1 Within the context of complex and constantly evolving sociospheres, the objective of a sustained better life for the masses is enhanced, according to Nobel Prize winner Amartya K. Sen (1983, 1988), by functionings and entitlements which cannot be implemented without a public commitment and a deep government involvement. Notwithstanding the inevitability of semantical differences, the real challenge of development does not lie in eliminating definitional disputes pertaining to the objective of development but in illuminating those pertinent instrumental relations which are relevant in each social milieu, and which, when properly activated, generate an internal development dynamic. Such a dynamic would exhibit characteristics of uniformity in countries with high degrees of similarity in human and natural resources, in institutions and in individual preferences. If advanced industrial countries converge toward similar patterns, the same cannot be observed in developing countries whose differences are more pronounced than their similarities. The task of establishing meaningful patterns of uniformity in the highly differentiated developing world is not easy, but if accomplished, it would guarantee substantial benefits in the formulation of effective strategies and policies. An area in which the search for such patterns goes on unabated is that of international trade and openness. Forces of dependence, autarky, balance of payments, international competition, vulnerability to external shocks affect the objective of developing countries to achieve some degree of balanced growth,2 and most certainly influence their patterns of trade. Although these forces are important, they are beyond the scope of this paper, which focuses on the investigation of possible trade patterns and their impact on growth. In the course of this investigation the paper is organized as follows. In the next section the role of openness is examined along with citations of empirical studies that analyze the impact of export growth and export growth volatility on the growth of GNP. In the third section the rationale of Granger causality, which constitutes the core of the paper, is presented, followed by short sections on unit root tests, cointegration tests, and volatility tests that are accompanied by a brief analysis of the respective statistical results. In the final section the conclusions of the paper are summarized.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies

References

Afxentiou, Panos C., and Apostolos Serletis. 1992. “Openness in the Canadian Economy: 1870–1988.” Applied Economics 24, no. 11: 1191–98. ———. 1995. “The Impact of International Indebtedness on the Import-Export Sectors of Developing Countries.” International Economic Journal 9, no. 1: 73–87. Bahamni-Oskooee, Mohsen; Hamid Mohtadi; and Ghiath Shebsigh. 1991. “Exports, Growth and Causality in LDCs: A Reexamination.” Journal of Development Economics 36, no. 2: 405–15. Basu, Parantap, and Darryl McLeod. 1991. “Terms of Trade Fluctuations and Economic Growth in Developing Economies.” Journal of Development Economics 37, nos. 1–2: 89–110. Bhagwati, Jagdish N. 1978. Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Anatomy and Consequences of Exchange Control Regimes. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger. Bollerslev, Tim. 1986. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity.” Journal of Econometrics 31, no. 3: 307–27. Campbell, John Y., and Pierre Perron. 1991. “Pitfalls and Opportunities—What Macroeconomists Should Know about Unit Roots.” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1991, ed. Olivier Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fisher. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Chenery, Hollis B., and Allan B. Strout. 1966. “Foreign Assistance and Economic Development.” American Economic Review 56, no. 4: 679–733. Chow, Peter C.Y. 1987. “Causality between Export Growth and Industrial Development: Empirical Evidence from the NICs.” Journal of Development Economics 26, no. 1: 55– 63. Clark, Don P. 1997. “Do Outward-Oriented Developing Countries Industrialize Faster?” International Economic Journal 11, no. 3: 75–83. Dawe, David. 1996. “A New Look at the Effects of Export Instability on Investment and Growth.” World Development 24, no. 12: 1905–14. Dickey, David A., and Wayne A. Fuller. 1981. “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Econometrica 49, no. 4: 1057–72. Dollar, David. 1992. “Outward-Oriented Developing Countries Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 40, no. 3: 523–45. Enders, Walter. 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Engle, Robert F. 1982. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation.” Econometrica 50, no. 4: 987–1007. Engle, Robert F., and Clive W. Granger. 1987. “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Econometrica 55, no. 2: 251–76. Fosu, Augustin K. 1992. “Effect of Export Instability on Economic Growth in Africa.” Journal of Developing Areas 26, no. 3: 323–32. Glezakos, Constantine. 1973. “Export Instability and Economic Growth: A Statistical Verification.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 21, no. 4: 670–78. Gonzalo, Jesus. 1994. “Five Alternative Methods for Estimating Long-Run Equilibrium Relationships.” Journal of Econometrics 60, nos. 1–2: 203–33. Gyimah-Brempong, Kwabena. 1991. “Export Instability and Economic Growth in Sub- Saharan Africa.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 39, no. 4: 815–28. 162 THE DEVELOPING ECONOMIES Hirschman, Albert. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Jung, Woo S., and Peyton J. Marshall. 1985. “Exports, Growth and Causality in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 18, no. 1: 1–12. Kaldor, Nicholas. 1967. Strategic Factors in Economic Development. Ithaka, N.Y.: Cornell University, New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations. Keesing, Donald B. 1967. “Outward-Looking Policies and Economic Development.” Economic Journal 77, no. 306: 303–20. Krueger, Anne O. 1978. Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Liberalization Attempts and Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger. Kunst, Robert M., and Dalia Marin. 1989. “On Exports and Productivity: A Causal Analysis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 71, no. 4: 699–703. Lewis, W. Arthur. 1984. “The State of Development Theory.” American Economic Review 74, no. 1: 1–10. Lim, David. 1976. “Export Instability and Economic Growth: A Return to Fundamentals.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 38, no. 4: 311–22. Love, James. 1992. “Export Instability and the Domestic Economy: Questions of Causality.” Journal of Development Studies 28, no. 4: 735–42. MacBean, Alasdair I. 1966. Export Instability and Economic Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. MacKinnon, James G. 1994. “Approximate Asymptotic Distribution Functions for Unit- Root and Cointegration Tests.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12, no. 2: 167–76. Moran, Cristián. 1983. “Export Fluctuations and Economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Development Economics 12, nos. 1–2: 195–218. Nelson, Charles R., and Charles J. Plosser. 1982. “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Monetary Economics 10, no. 2: 139–62. Pantula, G. Sastry; Graciela Gonzales-Farias; and Wayne A. Fuller. 1994. “A Comparison of Unit Root Test Criteria.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12, no. 4: 449– 59. Phillips, Peter C. B. 1987. “Time Series Regression with a Unit Root.” Econometrica 55, no. 2: 277–301. Phillips, Peter C. B., and Pierre Perron. 1988. “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression.” Biometrika 75, no. 2: 335–46. Scitovsky, Tibor. 1954. “Two Concepts of External Economies.” Journal of Political Economy 62, no. 2: 143–51. ———. 1959. “Growth—Balanced or Unbalanced?” In The Allocation of Economic Resources, ed. M. Abramovitz et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Sen, Amartya K. 1983. “Development: Which Way Now?” Economic Journal 93, no. 372: 745–62. ———. 1988. “The Concept of Development.” In Handbook of Development Economics, vol. 1, ed. Hollis Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Sharma, Subhash C., and Dharmendra Dhakal. 1992. “Causal Analyses between Exports and Economic Growth in Developing Countries.” Applied Economics 26, no. 12: 1162–87. Sharma, Subhash C.; Mary Norris; and Daniel W. W. Cheung. 1991. “Exports and Economic Growth in Industrialized Countries.” Applied Economics 23, no. 4A: 697–708. Stock, James H. 1994. “Unit Roots, Structural Breaks and Trends.” In Handbook of EconoOUTPUT GROWTH AND EXPORT AND IMPORT GROWTH 163 metrics, vol. 4, edited by Robert F. Engle and Daniel L. McFadden. Amsterdam: North- Holland. Van Wincoop, Eric. 1992. “Terms of Trade Uncertainty, Saving and the Production Structure.” Journal of International Economics 33, nos. 3–4: 305–25.