Dickey, Heather and Watson, Verity and Zangelidis, Alexandros (2009): What triggers multiple job holding? An experimental investigation.
Download (271kB) | Preview
This paper presents an empirical examination of individuals’ motivations for multiple-job holding or moonlighting. Theoretical models of moonlighting suggest that individuals to hold a second job for either financial reasons (they face hours-constraints in their first job) or non-pecuniary motives (heterogeneous jobs). We assess the relative importance of these reasons using a purposefully collected stated preference data set. We find that individuals respond to financial constraints by having multiple-jobs, but these financial motives are not sufficient to explain moonlighting. We also find that individuals are attracted to the non-pecuniary aspects of the second jobs, such as job satisfaction and entrepreneurial opportunities. Furthermore, we find evidence that second job holding may be a hedging strategy against job insecurity in the primary job. Our empirical results contribute to a better understanding of this labour market behaviour.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||What triggers multiple job holding? An experimental investigation.|
|Keywords:||Multiple-job holding; discrete choice experiment|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply|
|Depositing User:||Alexandros Zangelidis|
|Date Deposited:||30. Sep 2009 08:25|
|Last Modified:||07. Jan 2016 10:32|
Bell, D. N. F., Hart, R.A. and Wright, R.E. (1997) ‘Multiple job-holding as a ‘hedge’ against unemployment’, CEPR discussion paper series No. 1626.
Blumenschein, K., Blomquist, G., Johannesson, M., Horn, N. and Freeman P. (2008) ‘Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment’ The Economic Journal, vol. 118, pp. 114-137.
Böheim, R. and Taylor, M.P. (2004), ‘And in the evening she’s a singer with the band – Second jobs, plight or pleasure?’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1081.
Carlsson, F. and Martinsson, P. (2001). ‘Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 41, pp. 179-92.
Conway, K. and Kimmel, J. (1998) ‘Male labor supply estimates and the decision to moonlight’, Labour Economics, vol. 5, pp. 135-166.
Cox, D.R. (1958). Planning of Experiments, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Dickey, H. and Theododdiou, I. (2006). ‘Who has two jobs and why? Evidence from rural coastal communities in west Scotland’, Agricultural Economics, vol. 34, pp. 291-301.
Guariglia, A. and Byung-Yeon K., (2006). ‘The dynamics of moonlighting in russia: What is happening in the russian informal economy’. Economics of Transition. vol. 14(1), pp. 1-45.
Guthrie, H.W. (1969) ‘Teachers in the moonlight’, Monthly Labour Review, vol. 92, pp. 28 – 31.
Hamel, H.R.. (1967) ‘Moonlighting – An economic phenomenon’, Monthly Labour Review, vol. 90, pp. 17 – 22.
Harrison, B. (1998) ‘The dark side of flexibility’, Challenge, vol. 41, pp. 117-127.
Heineck, G. and Schwarze, J. (2004) ‘Fly me to the moon - The determinants of secondary jobholding in Germany and the UK’, IZA-Discussion Paper No. 1358.
Hensher, D., Rose, J. and Greene, W. (2006) Applied Choice Analysis, Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.
Kanninen, B. J. (Ed.) (2007) Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Kimmel, J. and Conway, K.S. (2001) ‘Who moonlights and why? Evidence from the SIPP’, Industrial Relations, vol. 40, pp. 89-120.
Krishnan, P. (1990) ‘The economics of moonlighting: A double self-selection model’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 72, pp. 361-7.
Lancaster, K. (1966) ‘A new approach to consumer theory’, Journal of Consumer Theory, vol. 74, pp. 132-157.
Liljas, B. and Blumenschein, K. (2000). ‘On hypothetical bias and calibration in cost benefit studies’. Health Policy, vol. 52, pp. 53-70.
List, J.A., and Gallet, C.A. (2001). ‘What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values?’ Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 20, pp. 241-54.
Lusk, J.L., and Schroeder, T.C. (2004). ‘Are choice experiments incentive compatible? A test with quality differentiated beef steaks’. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 86, pp. 467-482.
McFadden, D. (1973) ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour’, in “Frontiers in Econometrics” (P. Zarembka, Ed.), New York: Academic Press.
Panos, G.A., Pouliakas, K. and Zangelidis, A. (2009) ‘The inter-related dynamics of dual job holding and occupational choice’. University of Aberdeen Mimeo.
Paxson, C., and Sicherman, N. (1996), ‘The dynamics of dual job holding and job mobility’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 14, pp. 357 – 393.
Shishko, R., and Rostker, B. (1976) ‘The economics of multiple job holding’, American Economic Review, vol. 66, pp. 298 – 308.
Sloane, N. J. A. A library of orthogonal arrays (website) http://www.research.att.com/~njas/oadir/index.html
Train, K. (2001) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.