Giertz, Seth (2008): Panel Data Techniques and the Elasticity of Taxable Income.
Download (226kB) | Preview
This paper examines the elasticity of taxable income with special focus on income controls designed to control for divergence in the income distribution and mean reversion. Additional emphasis is placed on the difference between short-run and longer-run responses to tax rate changes. Several panel techniques are applied to tax return data for years 1991 to 1997, followed by a cross-section analysis covering the same period. For each panel regression, an innovative inverted panel regression framework is employed to test the efficacy of the controls for mean reversion apart from controls for divergence in the income distribution. Finally, cross-section (and repeated cross-section) regressions are estimated for comparison. A major finding from comparing estimates from the standard and inverted panels is that even some of the more sophisticated techniques likely fail to adequately control for mean reversion at the top of the income distribution. Furthermore, the residual impact from mean reversion may still exert an enormous influence on elasticity estimates, which could help explain the lack of robustness reported in a number of papers in this literature. Analysis of cross-section data circumvents the problem of mean reversion and results in estimates that are robust with respect to sample income cutoffs. However when vast differences likely exist between those experiencing a specific change in tax rates and other filers, estimates relying on either panel or cross-section data are likely to be poorly identified.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Panel Data Techniques and the Elasticity of Taxable Income|
|Keywords:||Elasticity of Taxable Income; Taxation; Behavioral Responses to Taxation; Panel Data Techniques|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J22 - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
|Depositing User:||Seth Giertz|
|Date Deposited:||01. Oct 2009 15:29|
|Last Modified:||24. May 2015 01:40|
Auten, Gerald and Robert Carroll, “The Effect of Income Taxes on Household Behavior,” Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1999, 81 (4), 681-693.
Congressional Budget Office, Effective Federal Tax Rates, 1979-1997, Congressional Budget Office, Washington, D.C., October 2001.
Feldstein, Martin, “The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: A Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act,” Journal of Political Economy, June 1995, 103 (3), 551–572.
——, “Tax Avoidance and the Deadweight Loss of the Income Tax,” Review of Economics and Statistics, November 1999, 4 (81), 674–680.
Giertz, Seth, “Taxable Income Responses to 1990s Tax Acts: Further Explorations,” Working Paper 2008-01, Congressional Budget Office, Washington D.C., www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8936/2008-01.pdf, (forthcoming 2008).
Giertz, Seth, “How Does the Elasticity of Taxable Income Affect Economic Efficiency and Tax Revenues and What Implications Does this Have for Tax Policy Moving Forward,” in Tax Policy Lessons from the 2000s, AEI Press, Washington, D.C., 2009.
Giertz, Seth, “A Sensitivity Analysis of the Elasticity of Taxable Income,” Working Paper 2008-01, Congressional Budget Office, Washington D.C., www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/89xx/doc8936/2008-01.pdf, (January 2008).
Giertz, Seth, “The Elasticity of Taxable Income over the 1980s and 1990s,” National Tax Journal, 60(4 ), December 2007: 743-768.
Giertz, Seth, “The Elasticity of Taxable Income During the 1990s: A Sensitivity Analysis,” Congressional Budget Office, Washington D.C., Working Paper 2006-3, February 2006, www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=7037.
Giertz, Seth, “Recent Literature on Taxable-Income Elasticities,” Technical Paper 2004 16, Congressional Budget Office, Washington D.C., December 2004, www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/60xx/doc6028/2004 16.pdf.
Goolsbee, Austan, “What Happens When You Tax the Rich? Evidence from Executive Compensation,” Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108 (2), 352-378.
Gruber, Jonathan and Emmanuel Saez, “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications,” Journal of Public Economics, April 2002, 84 (1), 1–32.
Heim, Bradley, “The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence from a New Panel of Tax Returns,” working paper, 2008.
Kopczuk, Wojciech, “Tax Bases, Tax Rates and the Elasticity of Reported Income,” Journal of Public Economics, December 2005, 89 (11-12), 2093-2119.
Moffitt, Robert and Mark Wilhelm, “Taxation and the Labor Supply Decisions of the Affluent,” Does Atlas Shrug? The Economic Consequences of Taxing the Rich, Joel Slemrod, ed., New York: Harvard University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, 2000.
Piketty, Thomas and Emmanuel Saez, “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 2003, 118 (1), 1–39.
Saez, Emmanuel, “Reported Incomes and Marginal Tax Rates, 1960–2000: Evidence and Policy Implications,” Tax Policy and the Economy 18, In Poterba, J. (Ed.), 2004, Cambridge: MIT Press, 117-173.
Sammartino, Frank and David Weiner, “Recent Evidence on Taxpayers' Response to the Rate Increases in the 1990s,” National Tax Journal, September 1997, 50 (3), 683-705.
Slemrod, Joel, “High income families and the tax changes of the 1980s: The Anatomy of Behavioral Response,” 1996, In Feldstein, M., Poterba, J. (Eds.), Empirical Foundations of Household Taxation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 169-189.
——, “Methodological Issues in Measuring and Interpreting Taxable Income Elasticities,” National Tax Journal, December 1998, 51 (4), 773–788.
Steurle, C. Eugene, “Contemporary U.S. Tax Policy,” 2004, Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C.