Mezgebo, Taddese (2006): "Who was getting the highest share of the tiny pie? : Robust analysis of poverty dynamics and its decomposition by Ethiopian socioeconomic groups in the period of 1995 - 2000".
Download (435kB) | Preview
The general distribution of benefit was skewed to major urban centers, educated individuals, employee and individuals headed by formal employee and employers. But in terms of income the economic environment was very effective in avoiding the destitution among the most impoverished but not to rise the over all income among the poor. The economic environment in period 1995 to 2000 seems to discourage the risk takers and failed to improve the welfare of those better off poor. So if better distribution was strong side of this period; inability to raise incomes and discouraged risk taking behavior were the main short comings.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||"Who was getting the highest share of the tiny pie? : Robust analysis of poverty dynamics and its decomposition by Ethiopian socioeconomic groups in the period of 1995 - 2000"|
|Keywords:||poverty ethiopia dynamics change in poverty|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
|Depositing User:||Taddese Mezgebo|
|Date Deposited:||20. Oct 2009 09:05|
|Last Modified:||21. Feb 2013 03:17|
Louis-Marie Asselin and Anyck Dauphin (2001) ‘Poverty measurement a conceptual framework’ CECI, http//www.ceci.ca
Jean-Yves Duclos (2002) “sampling design and statistical reliability of poverty and equality analysis using DAD” MIMAP program
Jean-Yves Duclos and Abdelkrim Araary (2005) ‘Poverty and Equity: Measurement, Policy and Estimation with DAD” MIMAP program
Angus Deaton (1997) the analysis of house hold surveys, ‘a micro-econometric approach to development policy’ World Bank