Freeman, Alan (2005): Towards a common standard: comparing European and American cities. Published in: Greater London Authority Economics Working Papers No. 13 (1 July 2005)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_18104.pdf Download (253kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper assesses to what extent it is possible to construct standardised geographical definitions of cities that will allow American and European cities to be compared in a consistent manner.
It reproduces, in citable form and, for scholarly purposes, the report of the same name produced by the author for the Greater London Authority.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Towards a common standard: comparing European and American cities |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Keywords: City; global city; Functional Urban Region; Larger Urban Zone; Territorial Indicators; Metropolitan Region; pluralism |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General |
Item ID: | 18104 |
Depositing User: | Alan Freeman |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2009 14:26 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:25 |
References: | Freeman A, 2004, US counties and European NUTS areas: some comparisons: GLA Economics internal note, GLA, London Freeman, A., 2004, Working Paper 9: Measuring and Comparing World Cities, GLA, London Hall P, 2004, Is the Greater South-East a Mega-City Region, paper presented at the Institute of Public Policy Research seminar on Sustainable Development in the South East, 10th December 2004. See http://www.ippr.org Hall P, 1999, Planning for the Mega-City: a new Eastern Asian urban form?, in Brotchie J, Newton P, Hall P and Dickey J (eds) East-West Perspectives on 21st Century Urban Development: Sustainable Eastern and Western Cities in the New Millenium, 3-36. Aldershot: Ashgate. IAURIF (Institute for Urban Planning and Development of the Paris Ile-de-France region), Cahiers de l’Iaurif, No 135. See www.iaurif.org/en/doc/studies/cahiers/cahier_135/index.htm Mills, E. S. and Hamilton, B.W, 1994, Urban Economics, 5th ed., Harper Collins, New York Office for National Statistics, 2004, Key Statistics for Urban Areas in the South East, London. Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/census2001/ks_urban_south_east_part_1.pdf Office of Management and Budget, 2000a, Standards for Defining Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas: Notice, Federal Register, Wednesday 27 December 2000. Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/00-32997.pdf Office of Management and Budget, 2000b, Alternative Approaches to defining metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: Notice, Federal Register, Vol 63 No 244 Parkinson M, Simmie J, Clark G and Verdonk H, 2004, Competitive European Cities: Where do the core cities stand?, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London Pumain D, Saint-Julien T, Cattan N and Rozenblat C, 1992, The statistical concept of the town in Europe, Statistical document, Theme 3, Series E, Eurostat, Luxembourg Simmie J, Blake N, Brownhill S, Glasson J, Holt R, Marshall T, Martin R, Westwood A, and Wood P, 2005, Realising the Full Economic Potential of London and the Core Cities, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford Urban Audit II, 2004a, Demographic, economic and social data on 258 cities across Europe, Document 82/2004, 25 June 2004, Luxemburg. See Eurostat and Urban Audit’s home pages www.urbanaudit.org and www.europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/urban2/urban/audit/src/intro.html Urban Audit, 2004b, Methodological Handbook. Luxemburg. See Eurostat and Urban Audit’s home pages: www.urbanaudit.org and www.europa.eu.int/comm/regional_policy/urban2/urban/audit/src/intro.html |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/18104 |