Optimal auditing with scoring: theory and application to insurance fraud

Dionne, Georges and Giuliano, Florence and Picard, Pierre (2009): Optimal auditing with scoring: theory and application to insurance fraud. Published in: Management Science , Vol. 55, No. 1 (January 2009): pp. 58-70.

Abstract

This article makes a bridge between the theory of optimal auditing and the scoring methodology in an asymmetric information setting. Our application is meant for insurance claims fraud, but it can be applied to many other activities that use the scoring approach. Fraud signals are classified based on the degree to which they reveal an increasing probability of fraud. We show that the optimal auditing strategy takes the form of a “Red Flags Strategy” which consists in referring claims to a Special Investigative Unit (SIU) when certain fraud indicators are observed. The auditing policy acts as a deterrence device and we explain why it requires the commitment of the insurer and how it should affect the incentives of SIU staffs. The characterization of the optimal auditing strategy is robust to some degree of signal manipulation by defrauders as well as to the imperfect information of defrauders about the audit frequency. The model is calibrated with data from a large European insurance company. We show that it is possible to improve our results by separating different groups of insureds with different moral costs of fraud. Finally, our results indicate how the deterrence effect of the audit scheme can be taken into account and how it affects the optimal auditing strategy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Audit, scoring, insurance fraud, red flags strategy, fraud indicators, suspicion index, moral cost of fraud, deterrence effect, signal manipulation.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G22 - Insurance ; Insurance Companies ; Actuarial Studies; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics

References

Antle, R., Gordon, E., Narayanamoorthy, G, and Zhou, L., 2006. The Joint Determination of Audit Fees, Non-Audit Fees, and Abnormal Accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 27, 235-266.

Artis, M., Ayuso, M., and Guillén, M., 2002. Detection of Automobile Insurance Fraud with Discrete Choice Models and Misclassified Claims. Journal of Risk and Insurance 69, 325-340.

Baiman S., and Rajan, M.V., 1994. On the Design of Unconditional Monitoring Systems in Agencies. The Accounting Review 69, 217-229.

Beasley, M., 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71, 443-465.

Belhadji, E.B., Dionne, G., and Tarkhani, F., 2000. A Model for the Detection of Insurance Fraud. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Issues and Practice 25, 517-538.

Beneish, M., 1997. Detecting GAAP Violation: Implications for Assessing Earnings Management Among Firms with Extreme Financial Performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16, 271-309.

Boyer, M.M., 2001. Mitigating Insurance Fraud: Lump-Sum Awards, Premium Subsidies, and Indemnity Taxes. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 68, 403-435.

Caplan, D., 1999. Internal Controls and the Detection of Management Fraud. Journal of Accounting Research 37, 101-117.

Christensen, P.O., Demski, J.S., and Frimor H., 2002. Accounting Policies in Agencies with Moral Hazard and Renegotiation. Journal of Accounting Research 40, 1071-1090.

Crocker, K.J. and Morgan, R.J., 1997. Is Honesty the Best Policy? Curtailing Insurance Fraud through Optimal Incentive Contracts. Journal of Political Economy 106, 355-375.

Crocker, K.J. and Tennyson, S., 2002. Insurance Fraud and Optimal Claims Settlement Strategies. Journal of Law and Economics 45, 469-507.

Dechow, P., Ge, W., Larson, C.R., and Sloan, R.G., 2007. Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Mimeo, University of Michigan and University of Washington.

Dechow, P., Sloan, R., and Sweeney, A., 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13, 1-36.

Derrig, R.A. and Weisberg, H.I., 2003. Auto Bodily Injury Claim Settlement in Massachusetts. Document, Automobile Insurers Bureau of Massachusetts, 36 p.

Dionne, G. and Gagné, R., 2001. Deductible Contracts Against Fraudulent Claims: Evidence from Automobile Insurance. Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 290-301.

Dionne, G. and Gagné, R., 2002. Replacement Cost Endorsement and Opportunistic Fraud in Automobile Insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24, 213-230.

Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, E.G., 2001. Pattern Classification.Wiley, New York.

Dunn, P., 2004. The Impact of Insider Power on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Management 30, 397-412.

Dye, R.A., 1993. Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth. Journal of Political Economy 101, 887-914.

Gale, D. and Hellwig M., 1985. Incentive-Compatible Debt Contracts: The One-Period Problem. Review of Economic Studies 52, 647-663.

Graetz, M.J., Reinganum, J.F., and Wilde, L.L., 1986. The Tax Compliance Game: Toward and Interactive Theory of Law Enforcement. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 2, 1-32.

Knowles, J., Persico N., and Todd P., 2001. Racial Bias in Motor Vehicle Searches: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Political Economy, 109, 203-229.

Kofman, F. and Lawarrée, J., 1993. Collusion in Hierarchical Agency. Econometrica 61, 629-656.

Melumad, M.D. and Mookherjee, D., 1989. Delegation as Commitment: The Case of Income Tax Audits. The RAND Journal of Economics 20, 139-163.

Mookerjee, D. and Png, I.P.L., 1989. Optimal Auditing Insurance and Distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 399-415.

Morton, S., 1993. Strategic Auditing for Fraud. The Accounting Review 68, 825-839.

Narayanan, V.G., 1994. An Analysis of Auditor Liability Rules. Journal of Accounting Research 32(Supplement), 39-59.

Newman, D.P., Patterson, E., and Smith, R., 2001. The Influence of Potentially Fraudulent Reports on Audit Risk Assessment and Planning. The Accounting Review 76, 59-80.

Pae, S., and Yoo S.-W., 2001. Strategic Interaction in Auditing: An Analysis of Auditors’ Legal Liability, Internal Control System Quality, and Audit Effort. The Accounting Review 76, 333-356.

Persico, N., 2002. Racial Profiling, Fairness, and Effectiveness of Policing. The American Economic Review 92, 1472-1497.

Picard, P., 1999. On the Design of Optimal Insurance Contracts under Manipulation of Audit Costs. International Economic Review 41, 1049-1071.

Picard, P., 2000. Economic Analysis of Insurance Fraud. In Handbook of Insurance, G. Dionne (Ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 315-362.

Shibano, T., 1990. Assessing Audit Risk from Errors and Irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research 28, 110-140.

Simunic, D.A., 1984. Auditing, Consulting, and Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22, 679-702.

Skousen, C.J. and Wright, C.J., 2006. Contemporaneous Risk Factors and the Prediction of Financial Statement Fraud. Working paper, University of Texas at Arlington.

Summers, S. and Sweeney, J., 1998. Fraudulently Misstated Financial Statements and Insider Trading: An Empirical Analysis. The Accounting Review 73, 131-146.

Townsend, R., 1979. Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification. Journal of Economic Theory XXI, 265-293.

Townsend, R., 1988. Information Constrained Insurance: The Revelation Principle Extended. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21, 411-450.

Viaene, S., Derrig, R.A., Baesens, B., and Dedene, G., 2002. A Comparison of State-of-the-Art Classification Techniques for Expert Automobile Insurance Claim Fraud Detection. Journal of Risk and Insurance 69, 373-422.