Smith, John and Bezrukova, Katerina (2009): Towards an understanding of the endogenous nature of identity in games.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_18675.pdf Download (119kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We test the assumption that social preferences are unchanged throughout a one-shot strategic game. To do so, we study the relationship between the strategic nature of a game and identification in social groups. In our experiment, the subjects play one of two versions of the prisoner's dilemma game where the attractiveness of the uncooperative action is manipulated. We refer to the version with a relatively attractive uncooperative action as the Mean Game and the other as the Nice Game. Note that choice is relatively more difficult in the Nice Game as a result of the smaller difference between the payoffs associated the actions. We find that the strategic nature of the game affects the strength of identity. Specifically, we find that in the Mean Game there is little difference in the change in identification of those playing cooperatively and those playing uncooperatively. However, in the Nice Game those playing cooperatively exhibit a significantly stronger change in identification than those playing uncooperatively. We also present evidence regarding the timing of the change in identity and what causes this change. In particular, the decision difficulty literature is helpful in interpreting the results.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Towards an understanding of the endogenous nature of identity in games |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Group Identity; Game Theory; Other-Regarding Preferences, Endogenous Preferences |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior |
Item ID: | 18675 |
Depositing User: | John Smith |
Date Deposited: | 16 Nov 2009 15:30 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 03:18 |
References: | Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Blackwell Publishers: Walden MA. Aguiar, F., Branas-Garza, P., Espinosa, M.P., & Miller, L. (2007). Personal identity in the dictator game. Working paper, Max Planck Institute. Ahmed, A. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 324-337. Ariely, D., & Norton, M. (2007). How actions create-not just reveal-preferences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 13-16. Ando, K. (1999). Social identification and a solution to social dilemmas. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 227-235. Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737-753. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. (1999). Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10(4), 385-402. Benjamin, D., Choi, J., & Strickland, J. (2007). Social identity and preferences. Working paper, Cornell University and Yale University. Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B., Massoud, S., & Wang, H. (2006). Identity and self-other differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Working paper, University of Minnesota. Bodner, R., & Prelec, D. (2003). Self-signaling and diagnostic utility in everyday decision making. In I. Brocas & J. Carrillo (Eds.), The psychology of economic decision, Oxford University Press, New York. Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 75-111. Branscombe, N., & Wann, D. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657. Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 75-82. Brewer, M., & Kramer, R. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size and framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 543-549. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778. Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286. Brown, R., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17(2), 131-142. Canegallo, C., Ortona, G., Ottone, S., Ponzaono, F., & Scacciati, F. (2008). Competition versus cooperation: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 18-30. Carpenter, J. (2005). Endogenous social preferences. Review of Radical Political Economics, 37(1), 63-84. Charness, G., Rigotti, L., & Rustichini, A. (2007). Individual behavior and group membership. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1340-1352. Chen, Y., & Li, X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99(1), 431-457. Dawes, R., Van de Kragt, A., & Orbell, J. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimenal manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 82-97. De Cremer, D., & Van Dijk, E. (2002). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 435-442. De Cremer, D., Van Knippenberg, D., Van Dijk, E., & Van Leeuwen, E. (2008). Cooperating if one's goals are collective-based: Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1562-1579. De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2005). Managing diversity by creating team identity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58(3), 371-392. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186. Ferraro, P., & Cummings, R. (2007). Cultural diversity, discrimination, and economic outcomes: An experimental analysis. Economic Inquiry, 45(2), 217-232. Gaertner, S., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 239-249. Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement: Evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96(2), 212-216. Griesinger, D., & Livingston, J. (1973). Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental games. Behavioral Science, 18(3), 173-188. Grieve, P., & Hogg, M. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 926-940. Guth, W., Levati, M., & Ploner, M. (2008). Social identity and trust: An experimental investigation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37, 1293-1308. Hoff, K., & Pandey, P. (2006). Discrimination, social identity and durable inequalities. American Economic Review, 96(2), 206-211. Hogg, M., Cooper-Shaw, L., & Holzworth, D. (1993). Group prototypicality and depersonalized attraction in small interactive groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 452-465. Hogg, M., & Grieve, P. (1999). Social identity theory and the crisis of confidence in social psychology: A commentary, and some research on uncertainty reduction. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 79-93. Hogg, M., & Hardie, E. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180. Hogg, M., & Hardie, E. (1992). Prototypicality, conformity and depersonalized attraction: A Self-Categorization Analysis of Group Cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 41-56. Ip, G., Chiu, C.Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368-381. Kramer, R., & Brewer, M. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 1044-1057. Liberman, V., Sammuels, S., & Ross, L. (2004). The name of the game: Predictive power of reputations versus situational labels in determining prisoner's dilemma game moves. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(9), 1175-1185. Leberman, N., & Forster, J. (2006). Inferences from decision difficulty. Journal of Experimental Social Psycholgy, 42, 290-301. McLeish, K., & Oxoby, R. (2007). Identity, cooperation and punishment. Working paper, University of Calgary and IZA. Oakes, P., & Turner J.C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301. Perreault, S., & Bourhis, R. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 92-103. Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85. Reid, S., & Hogg, M. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 804-817. Schotter, A., Weiss, A., & Zapater, I. (1996). Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship Games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31, 37-56. Sharot, T., De Martino, B., & Dolan, R. (2009). How choice reveals, and shapes, expected hedonic outcome. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3760-3765. Shultz, T., & Lepper, M. (1996). Cognitive dissonance reduction as constraint satisfaction. Psychological Review, 103(2), 219-240. Shultz, T., Leveille, E., & Lepper, M. (1999). Free choice and cognitive dissonance revisited: Choosing 'lesser evils' versus 'greater goods'. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(1), 40-48. Steffel, M. (2009). The impact of choice difficulty on self and social preferences. Unpublished dissertation, Princeton University. Swann, W., Kwan, V., Polzer, J., & Milton, L. (2003). Fostering group identification and creativity in diverse groups: The role of individuation and self-verification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1396-1406. Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96-102. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, Academic Press. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M., & Bundy, R. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G.Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA, Brooks/Cole, 33-48. Reprinted (2001) in M. Hogg and D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations. Ann Arbor, MI, Psychology Press, 94-109. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel and W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, Nelson-Hall, 7-25. Turner, J. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Malden, MA, Blackwell, 6-34. Turner, J., & Bourhis, R. (1996). Social identity, interdependence and the social group: A reply to Rabie et. al. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities. Boston, Butterworth-Heinemann, 25-63. Vanbeselaere, N. (1991). The impact of in-group and out-group homogeneity/heterogeneity upon intergroup relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(3), 291-301. Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favourtism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265-284. Wit, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). The effect of social categorization on cooperation, in three types of social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 135-151. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/18675 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Towards an understanding of the endogenous nature of identity in games. (deposited 03 Apr 2009 09:48)
- Towards an understanding of the endogenous nature of identity in games. (deposited 16 Nov 2009 15:30) [Currently Displayed]