Cross-National Comparison of Internal Migration

Bell, Martin and Muhidin, Salut (2009): Cross-National Comparison of Internal Migration. Published in: Human Development Research Paper (HDRP) Series , Vol. 30, No. 2009

Abstract

Internal migration is the most significant process driving changes in the pattern of human settlement across much of the world, yet remarkably few attempts have been made to compare internal migration between countries. Differences in data collection, in geography and in measurement intervals seriously hinder rigorous cross-national comparisons. We supplement data from the University of Minnesota IPUMS collection to make comparisons between 28 countries using both five year and lifetime measures of migration, and focusing particularly on migration intensity and spatial impacts. We demonstrate that Courgeau's k (Courgeau 1973) provides a powerful mechanism to transcend differences in statistical geography. Our results reveal widespread differences in the intensity of migration, and in the ages at which it occurs, with Asia generally displaying low mobility and sharp, early peaks, whereas Latin America and the Developed Countries show higher mobility and flatter age profiles usually peaking at older ages. High mobility is commonly offset by corresponding counter-flows but redistribution through internal migration is substantial in some countries, especially when computed as a lifetime measure. Time series comparisons show five year migration intensities falling in most countries (China being a notable exception), although lifetime data show more widespread rises due to age structure effects. Globally, we estimate that 740 million people, one in eight, were living within their home country but outside their region of birth, substantially above the commonly cited figure of 200 million international migrants.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Internal migration, comparative analysis, migration intensity, redistribution, age, geography, lifetime, IPUMS
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O15 - Human Resources ; Human Development ; Income Distribution ; Migration; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs

References

Amaral, E. [2008]: Improvements of Techniques to Estimate Migration Rates: An Application with Brazilian Censuses Data, Population Review, 47(2): 1-24. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/population_review/v047/47.2.amaral.html

Australian Bureau of Statistics [1995]: 1991 Census of Population and Housing, Data Quality— Undercount. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics

Bell, M. [2002]: ‘Comparing population mobility in Australia and New Zealand’, Joint Special Issue of the Journal of Population Research and New Zealand Population Review, 169- 193.

Bell, M. [2004]: Measuring temporary mobility: dimensions and issues, Paper presented to the Session on Tourism and Temporary Mobilities, CAUTHE Conference, Brisbane, 10-13 February.

Bell, M. [2005]: ‘Towards rigorous cross-national comparison of internal migration: who collects what?’, Paper presented to the 25th Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Tours, France, July 18-23.

Bell, M. & Rees, P. [2006]: ‘Comparing migration in Britain and Australia: harmonisation through use of age-time plans’, Environment and Planning A, 38(5): 959-988

Bell, M., Blake, M., Boyle, P., Duke-Williams, O., Rees, P. & Stillwell, J. & Hugo, G., [2002]: 'Cross-national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 165(3): 435-464

Bell, M. & Ward, G.J. [2000]: 'Comparing permanent migration with temporary mobility', Tourism Geographies, 2(1), pp. 97-107

Blake, M., Bell, M. and Rees, P. [2000]: ‘Creating a temporally consistent spatial framework for the analysis of interregional migration in Australia, International Journal of Population Geography, 6, pp. 155-74

CEPAL Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe [2007]: Panorama Social de América Latina 2007, LC/G.2351-P/E, Santiago do Chile.

Champion, A. G. [1989]: Counterurbanisation, the Changing Pace and Nature of Population Deconcentration, London: Edward Arnold.

Chapman, M. and Prothero, M. [1983] : ‘Themes on circulation in the third world’, International Migration Review, 17 : 597-632.

Courgeau, D. [1973a]: Migrants and migrations. Population, 28, 95–128.

Courgeau, D. [1973b]: Migrations et d´ecoupages du territoire. Population, 28, 511–537.

Fang, Cai, Du Yang and Wang Meiyan [2009]: Migration and Labor Mobility in China, Institute of Population and Labor Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Gibbs, J. [1973]: ‘The evolution of population concentration’, Economic Geography??

Holdsworth, C. [2000]: Leaving home in Britain and Spain, European Sociological Review, 16(2): 201-222.

Hooimeijer P. and B. Van der Knaap. [1994]: From flows of people to networks of behaviour. Pp.177-85 in P. Hooimeijer, G.A. Van der Knaap, J. Van Weesep and R.I. Woods [eds]: , Population Dynamics in Europe, Current Issues in Population Geography, Netherlands Geographical Studies 173. Utrecht: Royal Netherlands Geographical Society and Department of Geography, University of Utrecht.

Kitsul, P. and Philipov, D. [1981]: The one year/five year migration problem. In Advances in Multiregional Demography (ed. A. Rogers): , pp. 1–34. Laxenberg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Langevin, B., Begeot, F. and Pearce, D. [1992]: Censuses in the European Community. Population Trends, 68, 33–36.

Law, G. [1999]: Administrative Subdivisions of Countries, Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland.

Long, J.F. and Boertlein, C.G. [1990]: Comparing migration measures having different intervals. Current Population Reports, Series P-23, pp. 1–11. Washington DC: US Bureau of the Census.

Long, L.H. [1991]: Residential mobility differences among developed countries. International Regional Science Review, 14, 133-47.

Long, L.H. [1992]: Changing residence, comparative perspectives on its relationship to age, sex and marital status. Population Studies, 46, 141-58.

Long, L.H., Tucker, C.J. and Urton, W.L. [1988]: Migration distances, an international comparison. Demography, 25, 633-40.

Nam, C. B., Serow, W. and Sly, D. [1990]: International Handbook on Internal Migration. Westport: Greenwood.

Newbold, K. B. and Bell, M. [2002]: Return and onwards migration in Canada and Australia, evidence from fixed interval data. Int. Migrn Rev., 35, 1157–1184.

Rees, P. H. [1977]: The measurement of migration from census data and other sources. Environ. Planng A, 9, 247–272.

Rees, P., Bell, M. Duke-Williams, O. & Blake, M. [2000]: 'Problems and solutions in the measurement of migration intensities: Australia and Britain compared', Population Studies, 54(2): 207-222.

Rees, P. & Kupiszewski, M. [1999a]: Internal migration: what data are available in Europe. J. Off. Statist., 15, 551–586.

Rees, P. & Kupiszewski, M. [1999b]: Internal Migration and Regional Population Dynamics in Europe: a Synthesis. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing

Rogers, A. and Castro, L.J. [1981]: Model Migration Schedules. Research Report RR-81-30. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Rogerson, P. A. [1990]: Migration analysis using data with time intervals of differing widths. Pap. Regl Sci. Ass., 68, 97–106.

Skeldon, R. [1990]: Population Mobility in Developing Countries, Belhaven Press, London.

Skeldon, R. [1997]: Migration and Development: A Global Perspective, Longman, Harlow, England.

Thomas, D.S. [1938]: Research Memorandum on Migration Differentials, Social Science Research Council, New York.

Thomas, D.S. [1958]: 'Age and economic differentials in interstate migration', Population Index, 24(4), pp. 313-325.

United Nations [1970]: Methods of Measuring Internal Migration, Manuals on Methods of Estimating Population, Manual 6, Population Studies No.47, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, New York.

United Nations [1978]: Statistics of Internal Migration: A Technical Report, Studies in Methods, Series F23, ST/ESA/STAT/SER F/23, Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations

United Nations [2000]: World Population Monitoring 1999: Population Growth, Structure and Distribution, Population Division, ST/ESA/SER A/183, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations

United Nations [2008]: An Overview of Urbanisation, Internal Migration, Population Distribution and Development in the World, United Nations Expert group Meeting on Population Distribution, Urbanisation, Internal Migration and Development, Population Division, 21-23 January 2008, UN/POP/EGM-URB/2008/01, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations

Vignoli, J.R. [2004]: Migración interna en América Latina y el Caribe: estudio regional del período 1980-2000, LC/L 2059-P, Serie Población y Desarrollo, No 50, Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía (CELADE, División de Población de la CEPAL), Santiago de Chile. http://www.eclac.cl/cgibin/ getProd.asp?xml=/publicaciones/xml/7/14467/P14467.xml&xsl=/celade/tpl/p9f.xsl&ba se=/celade/tpl/top-bottom.xsl

World Bank [2009]: World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography, Report Number 43738, The World Bank

Wrigley, N., Holt, T., Steel, D. and Tranmer, M. [1996]: Analysing, modelling, and resolving the ecological fallacy. In Spatial Analysis, Modelling in a GIS Environment (eds P. Longley and M. Batty): , pp. 23–40. Cambridge: GeoInformation International

Xu-Doeve, William L. J. [2006]: ‘The Measurement of International and Internal Migration in the 2010 Global Round of Population Censuses: Twelve Key Recommendations on Questions, Concepts and Procedures.’ Paper presented at the European Population Conference of the European Association for Population Studies (EAPS): , Liverpool, United Kingdom, June 21 to 24, 2006.

Zelinsky, W. [1971]: ‘The hypothesis of the mobility transition’, Geographical Review, 61: 219-249