Borooah, Vani (2007): Measuring economic inequality: deprivation, economising and possessing. Published in: Social Policy and Society , Vol. 6, No. 1 (2007): pp. 99-109.
Download (240kB) | Preview
One way of measuring the deprivation or poverty of persons is to use money-based measures: a person is regarded as ‘poor’ if his/her income (or expenditure) falls below a poverty line value. Such an approach – usually termed poverty analysis – has spawned a large literature embodying several sophisticated measures of poverty. The downside to this is that low income or expenditure may not be very good indicators of deprivation. Another way, usually termed ‘deprivation analysis’, is to define an index whose value, for each person, is the number (or proportion) of items from a prescribed list that he/she possesses: persons are then regarded as ‘deprived’ if their index value is below some threshold. This offers an alternative method of identifying deprived persons. The disadvantage of deprivation analysis is that it measures deprivation exclusively in terms of the proportion of deprived persons within the total number of persons. The purpose of this paper is to bridge the gap between poverty and deprivation analysis by constructing a wider set of measures of economic inequality and by showing, with data for Northern Ireland, how they might be applied. The result is an analysis sensitive to intra-population heterogeneity.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Measuring economic inequality: deprivation, economising and possessing|
|English Title:||Measuring economic inequality: deprivation, economising and possessing|
|Keywords:||Deprivation; Economising; Possessions|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty|
|Depositing User:||Vani / K Borooah|
|Date Deposited:||01. Jan 2010 17:33|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 06:52|
Foster, J., Greer, J. and Thorbecker, E. (1984), ‘A class of decomposable poverty measures’, Econometrica, 52, 761–66.
Gordon, D., Adelman, L., Ashworth, K., Bradshaw, J., Levitas, R., Middleton, S., Pantazis, C., Patsios, D., Payne, S., Townsend, P. and Williams, J. (2000), Poverty and Social Exclusion in Britain, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Hillyard, P., Kelly, G., McLaughlin, E., Patsios, D., Tomlinson, M. (2003), Bare Necessities: Poverty and Social Exclusion in Northern Ireland, Belfast: Democratic Dialogue.
Mack, J. and Lansley, S. (1985), Poor Britain, London: Allen & Unwin.
McLaughlin, E. and Monteith, M. (2005), ‘Measuring child poverty: equality and social inclusion’, in Ireland Project Working Paper 10, QUB, Belfast.
Nolan, B. and Whelan, C.T. (1996), Resources Deprivation and Poverty, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ringen, S. (1988), ‘Direct and indirect measures of poverty’, Journal of Social Policy, 17, 351–66.
Sen, A.K. (1976), ‘Poverty: an ordinal approach to measurement’, Econometrica, 44, 219–31.
Sen, A.K. (1993), ‘Capability and well-being’, in M. Nussbaum and A.K. Sen (eds), The Quality of Life, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A.K. (1998), On Economic Inequality, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Townsend, P. (1979), Poverty in the United Kingdom, Penguin: Harmondsworth.
Viet-Wilson, J. (1987), ‘Consensual approaches to poverty lines and social security’, Journal of Social Policy, 16, 2.
Zheng, B. (1997), ‘Aggregate poverty measures’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 11, 123–62.