Heterodox environmental economics: theoretical strands in search of a paradigm

Marletto, Gerardo (2009): Heterodox environmental economics: theoretical strands in search of a paradigm. Published in: Economia delle fonti di energia e dell'ambiente (Economics and policy of energy and the environment) , Vol. 52, No. 1 (2009): pp. 25-33.

Abstract

Heterodox environmental economics is mainly based on non-mainstream economic theories; more precisely it refers to institutional and Schumpeterian economics. Starting from these theoretical foundations, heterodox environmental economics radically differs from the mainstream approach to environmental economics and policy. Three basic concepts are at the hearth of such a different vision: resource regimes, as institutional structures established to manage natural resources; environmental appraisals, as “value articulating” institutions conditioned by the incommensurability of conflicting values; transitions, as dynamic processes that are needed to unlock existing “socio-technical” systems. But a stable community of researchers defining themselves as ‘evolutionary/institutional environmental economists’ still does not exist. Time will tell if existing connections between some research groups will generate the social core of a nascent paradigm.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental economics; Environmental policy; Institutional economics; Evolutionary theories of economic change
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary

References

Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J.L. (1988). The innovative choice: an economic analysis of the dynamics of technology. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

Amendola, M. and Gaffard, J.L. (1998). Out of Equilibrium. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Baumol, W.J. and Oates, W.E.. (1988). The theory of environmental policy (2nd). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)

Bazin, D., Ballet, J., Lioui, A. and Touahri, D. (2007). Green Taxation and Individual Responsibility. Ecological Economic 63 (4), 732-739

Berkhout, F. (2002). Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environmental Change 12, 1–4

Bowles, S. (1998). Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (March), 75-111

Bowles, S. (2008). Policies Designed for Self-Interested Citizens may Undermine «The Moral Sentiments»: Evidence from Economic Experiments. Science 320 (June), 1605-1609

Bromley, D.W. (1998). Searching for sustainability: the poverty of spontaneous order. Ecological Economics 24, 231-240

Bromley, D.W. (2007). Environmental regulations and the problem of sustainability: Moving beyond «market failure». Ecological Economics 63, 676-683

Calabresi, G. (1991). The pointlessness of Pareto: carrying Coase further. Yale Law Journal 100, 1211-1237

Common, M. and Stagl, S. (2005). Ecological Economics. An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)

Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Pinter, London

Frey, B.S. (1997). A Constitution for Knaves Crowds out Civic Virtues. The Economic Journal 107 (443), 1043-1053

Geels, F.W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33, 897–920

Gowdy, J. (2004). The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Evaluation and Policy. Land Economics 80 (2), 239-257

Gowdy, J. (2005). Towards a new welfare economics for sustainability. Ecological Economics 53, 211-222

Hardin, G. (1998). Extensions of the Tragedy of the Commons. Science 280 (5364), 682-683

Hodgson, G.M. (2000). What Is the Essence of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues 34 (2), 317-329

Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J. And Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Routledge, Oxford

Hoogma, R., Weber, M. and Elzen, B. (2005). Integrated Long-term Strategies to Induce Regime Shifts towards Sustainability: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management, In: Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, eds Weber, M. and Hemmelskamp, J., Springer-Verlag, Berlin

Jacobsson, S. and Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34, 256–276

Kemp, R. (1997). Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instrument. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Kemp, R. And Rotmans, J. (2005). The management of the co-evolution of technical, environmental and social systems, In: Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, eds Weber, M. and Hemmelskamp, J., Springer-Verlag, Berlin

Kemp, R. and Soete, L. (1992). Greening of technological progress. Futures (June), 437-457

Lundvall, B.A. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London

McCay, B.J. (2002). Emergence of Institutions for the Commons: Contexts, Situations and Events. In: The Drama of the Commons, ed. Olstrom, E., National Academy Press, Washington (DC)

Nelson, R. (2002). Bringing institutions into evolutionary growth theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 17–28

Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA)

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK)

Paavola, J. (2007). Institutions and environmental governance: A re-conceptualization. Ecological Economics 63, 93-103

Pelikan, P. (2003). Bringing institutions into evolutionary economics: another view with links to changes in physical and social technologies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 237–258

Rammel, C., Stagl, S and Wilfing, H. (2007). Managing complex adaptive systems — A co-evolutionary perspective on natural resource management. Ecological Economics 63, 9-21

Sartorius, C. (2006). Second-order sustainability – conditions for the development of sustainable innovations in a dynamic environment. Ecological Economics 58, 268-286

Silverberg, G., Dosi, G., Orsenigo, L. (1988). Innovation, diversity and diffusion: a self-organization model. Economic Journal 98, 1032-1054

Smith, S., Stirling, A. and Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34, 1491–1510

Stagl, S. (2007). Emerging Methods for Sustainability Valuation and Appraisal. Final Report, SDRN - Sustainable Development Research Network

Unruh, G.C. (2002). Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 30, 317–325

van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. and Stagl, S. (2003). Coevolution of economic behaviour and institutions: towards a theory of institutional change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13, 289–317

Vanderberg, P. (2002), North’s institutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (2), 217-235

Vatn, A. (2005). Institutions and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Vatn, A. (2007). Resource regimes and cooperation. Land Use Policy 24, 624-632

Vatn, A. and Bromley, D.W. (1997). Externalities – A Market Model Failure. Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 135–151

Walker, W. (2000). Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations. Research Policy 29, 833–846