Gielissen, R. and Dutilh, C.E. and Graafland, J.J. (2008): Perceptions of price fairness: An empirical research. Published in: Business & Society: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Exploration , Vol. 3, No. 47 (2008): pp. 370-389.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_20275.pdf Download (136kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper researches factors that influence price fairness judgements. The empirical literature suggests several factors: reference prices, the costs of the seller, a self-interest bias and the perceived motive of sellers. Using a Dutch sample, we find empirical evidence that these factors significantly affect perceptions of fair prices. In addition, we find that the perceived fairness of prices is also influenced by other distributional concerns that are independent of the transaction. In particular, price increases are judged to be fairer if they benefit poor people or small organisations rather than benefiting rich people or big organisations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Perceptions of price fairness: An empirical research |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Fair price; justice; fair trade; reference price |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D49 - Other P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
Item ID: | 20275 |
Depositing User: | Johan Graafland |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2010 16:27 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 07:25 |
References: | Adams, J. Stacey (1965), Inequity in social exchange, In: Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 267 - 299 Akerlof, G.A., 1982, Labor contracts as a partial gift exchange, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 543-69 Angelidis, J., & Ibrahim, N., 2004, An exploratory study of the impact of degree of religiousness upon an individual’s corporate social responsiveness orientation. Journal of Business Studies, 51, 119-128. Bolton, Lisa E., Luk Warlop and Joseph W. Alba (2003),Consumer perceptions of price (un)fairness, Journal of consumer research, Vol. 29, pp. 471 - 491 Bougie, Roger; Rik Pieters and Marcel Zeelenberg (2003), Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: the experience behavioural implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services, Academy of marketing science, pp. 377 - 393 Campbell, Margaret C. (1999), Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of marketing research, Vol. 36, pp. 187 - 199 Collie, T; Graham Bradley and Beverly A. Sparks (2002), Fair process revisited: Differential effects of interactional and procedural justice in the presence of social comparison information, Journal of experimental social psychology, Vol. 38, pp. 545 - 555 Dickson, Peter R. and Rosemary Kalapurakal (1994), The use and perceived fairness of price-setting rules in the bulk electricity market, Journal of economic psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 427 - 448 Frey, Bruno S. and Werner W. Pommerehne (1993), On the fairness of pricing – an empirical survey among the general population, Journal of economic behavior and organization, Vol. 30, pp. 295 - 307 Graafland, Johan J. (2002), Sourcing ethics in the textile sector: the case of C&A, Business Ethics: A European Review, pp. 282-294 Graafland, Johan J. (2007), Economics, ethics and the market: Introduction and applications, London: Routledge Huppertz, John W; Sidney J. Arenson and Richard H. Evans (1978), An application of equity theory to buyer-seller exchange situations, Journal of marketing research, pp. 250 - 260 Kahneman, Daniel; Jack L. Knetsch and Richard Thaler (1986), Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market, The American economic review, Vol. 76 (4), pp. 728 - 741 Kalapurakal, Rosemary; Peter R. Dickson and Joel E. Urbany (1991), Perceived price fairness and dual entitlement, Advances in consumer research, Vol. 18, pp. 788 - 793 Klein, N., 2002, No logo, Lemniscaat, Rotterdam Maxwell, Sarah (1995), What makes a price increase seem ‘fair’?, Pricing strategy and practice, Vol. 3, pp. 21 - 27 Maxwell, Sarah (2002), Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase, Journal of economic psychology, Vol. 23, 2002, pp. 191 - 212 McClave, Benson and Sincich (1998), Statistics for business and economics, Seventh edition, Prentice-Hall Oliver, Richard L. and John E. Swan (1989), Consumer perceptions of interpersonal equity and satisfaction in transactions: A field survey approach, Journal of marketing, Vol. 53, pp. 21 - 35 Rabin, M., 1998, Psychology and Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVI, pp. 11-46 Sekaran, Uma (2003), Research methods for business: A skill building approach, John Wiley & Sons Sen, Amartya (1996), Maximisation and the Act of Choice, In: ‘Rationality and Freedom’ by Amartya Sen, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002 Sinha, Indrajit and Rajeev Batra (1999), The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase, International journal of research in marketing, Vol. 16, pp. 237 - 251 Stackhouse, M.L., Dennis P. McCann, Shirley J. Roels and Preston N. Williams (1995), On moral business; contemporary resources for ethics in economic life: Aquinas, Thomas (12XX), Of justice, and of cheating Thaler, Richard (1985), Mental accounting and consumer choice, Marketing science, Vol. 4 (3), pp. 199 - 214 Velasquez, M.G. (1998), Business ethics. Concepts and cases, Prentice Hall Xia, Lan; Kent B. Monroe and Jennifer L. Cox (2004), The price is unfair!, Journal of marketing, Vol. 68, pp. 1 – 15 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/20275 |