Roman, Monica (2008): The efficiency analysis applied for the evaluation of labour market policies: Study case for Romania. Published in: Revista Romana de Staatistica , Vol. 6, No. 11 (December 2008): pp. 58-78.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_20332.pdf Download (215kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The transition to a market economy started in Romania after 1989 and had significant repercussions on labor market outcomes, in terms of both levels and composition. Labor markets adjusted to the new economic environment by reducing employment and labor force participation, and by increasing unemployment to rates unseen in Romania. The Romanian government soon recognized the urgency of developing social safety programs and labour market programs to help the unemployed during this transition period, but only in the late 1990s a coherent and a large scale program was launched. Since there are important financial resources allotted to this type of spending, it is necessary to evaluate the social benefit they bring. Despite the great interest of this topic, both for scientists and for politicians, there are quite a few studies on Romanian labour market policies. One of the reasons is the unavailability of data and the lack of surveys on labour market policies. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the efficiency of some public policy measures in Romania, in time periods 2004 and 2005, and thus, to contribute to a better knowledge of Romanian labor market. We present the existing labour market policies in Romania and we focus on the most significant ten interventions. The efficiency analysis in performed using data envelopment analysis (DEA method), that has proven useful in a diverse variety of applications. Due to the rather small number of observed units, we use a small number of inputs and outputs. The inputs are the expenditure and the number of participants registered for each measures. As output we use the percentage of exits to employment in the total number of exits. We conduct the analysis for each year and we use Malmquist index numbers for evaluating the changes in efficiency of LMP in 2005 compared to 2004. The results emphasize that in both years the active measures were more efficient than the passive ones and the Completion of employees’ incomes (I11) was on the efficiency frontier, along with Vocational training (I7). Unemployment indemnity (I2), the measure with the highest value of expenditure, was half efficient compared to those situated on efficiency frontier.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The efficiency analysis applied for the evaluation of labour market policies: Study case for Romania |
English Title: | The efficiency analysis applied for the evaluation of labour market policies: Study case for Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | labour market policy, DEA, efficiency, Transition economy, Romania |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J65 - Unemployment Insurance ; Severance Pay ; Plant Closings P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P27 - Performance and Prospects J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers > J68 - Public Policy |
Item ID: | 20332 |
Depositing User: | Monica Roman |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2010 08:43 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:51 |
References: | Coelli, T.J. - A guide to DEAP Version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program”, CEPA Working Paper 96/08, 1996, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, Australia. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin A.Y. And Seiford, L.M., - Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994 Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper And E. Rhodes. - Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational. Research 2: 429-444. 1978 Cindrea, Ioan - The Crisis on the Labor Market in Romania, Theoretical and Applied Economics, 2007, vol. 4(509), issue 4(509), pages 25-28 Coelli T., Prasada Rao D.S., Battese G.E. - An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer (1998) Academic Publishers, Boston Dar A., And Z. Tzannatos. - “Active Labor Market Programs: A Review of the Evidence from Evaluations,” 1999. Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9901. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Dasgupta, A.K. - Growth, Development and Welfare. Blackwell, Oxford,1988 European Comission and EUROSTAT- Labour Market Policy Database. Methodology Revision of June 2006, Luxembourg 2006, download: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-BF-06-003/EN/KS-BF-06-003-EN.PDF, pg. 12 EUROSTAT- Labor market policies, 2007 edition, ISSN 1725-602X Earle, J. And C. Pauna. - “Incidence and Duration of Unemployment in Romania,” European Economic Review 49: 829-837. 1996. Farrel M.J. - The measurement of productive efficiency. Jornal of the royal statistical society, Series A, CXX, Part 3, 253-290(1957) Giuffrida A.- Productivity and efficiency changes in primary care: a Malmquist index approach. Health Care Management Science, 2, 11-26,1999 Halkos, George Emm. and Nickolaos G. Tzeremes- A DEA approach to regional development, Department of Economics, University of Thessaly Karkazis, J. And Thanassoulis E. (1998). - Assessing the Effectiveness of Regional Development Policies in Northern Greece. Socio-Economical Planning Science Vol 32, no 2. pp. 123-137. Lerman, Zvi & Pepijn Schreinemachers - Individual Farming as a Labour Sink: Evidence from Poland and Russia Comparative Economic Studies, 2005, 47, (675–695) Micevska, Maja - Labor Market Institutions And Policies In Southeast Europe,working paper, Center for Development Research,University of Bonn OECD (2000), - Labor Market and Social Policy in Romania. Paris: OECD. Rodriguez-Planas, Nuria Jacob Benus- EVALUATING ACTIVE LABOR MARKET PROGRAMS IN ROMANIA, paper presented at EALE Conference, Prague 2006 Roman, M. - Resursele umane in Romania. Evaluare si eficienta, Editura ASE, Bucuresti, 2003 Yoshii, Masahiko - An Overview of Labor Market in Romania in Transition Department of Economics, Kobe University |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/20332 |