In what format and under what timeframe would China take on climate commitments? A roadmap to 2050

Zhang, ZhongXiang (2009): In what format and under what timeframe would China take on climate commitments? A roadmap to 2050.

Abstract

In what format and under what timeframe China would take on climate commitments is of significant relevance to China because it is facing great pressure both inside and outside international climate negotiations to exhibit greater ambition and is being confronted with the threats of trade measures. It is of significant global relevance as well because when China’s emissions peak is crucial to determine when global emissions would peak and because what China is going to do in what format has significant implications for the level and ambition of commitments from other countries.

In response to these concerns and to put China in a positive position, this paper maps out the roadmap for China’s specific climate commitments towards 2050. Taking many factors into consideration, the paper argues that China needs to take on absolute emissions caps around 2030. While this date is later than the time frame that the U.S. and other industrialized countries would like to see, it would probably still be too soon from China’s perspective. However, it is hard to imagine how China could apply the brakes so sharply as to switch from rapid emissions growth to immediate emissions cuts, without passing through several intermediate phases. To that end, the paper envisions that China needs the following three transitional periods of increasing climate obligations before taking on absolute emissions caps that will lead to the global convergence of per capita emissions by 2050: First, further credible energy-conservation commitments starting 2013 and aimed at cutting China’s carbon intensity by 45-50% by 2020; second, voluntary “no lose” emission targets starting 2018; and third, binding carbon intensity targets as its international commitment starting 2023. Overall, this proposal is a balanced reflection of respecting China’s rights to grow and recognizing China’s growing responsibility for increasing greenhouse gas emissions as China is approaching the world’s largest economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Carbon intensity target; Binding emissions caps; Post-Copenhagen climate negotiations; Energy saving; Renewable energy; Clean development mechanism; China; USA; India
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

ClimateWire (2009), India Rejects Comparison with China’s Emissions, March 26.

Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations (UNDESA, 2009), World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision, Available at: http://esa.un.org/unpp.

EIA (2004), International Energy Outlook 2004, U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, DC.

EIA (2009), International Energy Outlook 2009, DOE/EIA-0484(2009), U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Washington, DC, May 27, Available at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/.

Frankel, J.A. (2009), An Elaborated Global Climate Policy Architecture: Specific Formulas and Emission Targets for All Countries in All Decades, NBER Working Paper No. 14876, April, Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14876.pdf.

Hu, A. (2009), A New Approach at Copenhagen, April 6, Available at: http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/2895-A-new-approach-at-Copenhagen-2-.

IEA (2009), World Energy Outlook 2009, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change, Working Group III Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

National Bureau of Statistics of China (2009), China Statistical Yearbook 2009, China Statistics Press, Beijing.

National Bureau of Statistic (NBS), National Development and Reform Commission and National Energy Administration (2008), Bulletin on Energy Use per Unit of GDP and other Indicators by Region, Beijing, July 14, Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgb/t20080714_402491870.htm.

National Bureau of Statistic (NBS), National Development and Reform Commission and Office of The National Energy Leading Group (2007), Bulletin on Energy Use per Unit of GDP and other Indicators by Region, Beijing, July 12, Available at: http://hzs.ndrc.gov.cn/newjn/t20070809_152873.htm.

National Bureau of Statistic (NBS), National Development and Reform Commission and National Energy Administration (2009), Bulletin on Energy Use per Unit of GDP and other Indicators by Region, Beijing, June 30, Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/qttjgb/qgqttjgb/t20090630_402568721.htm.

Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP, 2007), China Now No. 1 in CO2 Emissions; USA in Second Position, June 19, Available at: http://www.mnp.nl/en/dossiers/Climatechange/moreinfo/Chinanowno1inCO2emissionsUSAinsecondposition.html.

Reuters (2009a), U.S. Praises China’s Climate Efforts; Urges More, March 29, Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE52S1WP20090329.

Reuters (2009b), U.S. Seeks Reins in New Set of Climate Talks, April 24, Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE53N12720090424.

Stern, N. (2008), Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, April, Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/granthamInstitute/publications/KeyElementsOfAGlobalDeal_30Apr08.pdf

World Bank (2008), World Development Indicators 2008, Washington, DC.

Zhang, Z.X. (1995), Energy Conservation in China: An International Perspective, Energy Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 159-166.

Zhang, Z.X. (1997), The Economics of Energy Policy in China: Implications for Global Climate Change, New Horizons in Environmental Economics Series, Edward Elgar.

Zhang, Z.X. (2000), Can China Afford to Commit itself an Emissions Cap? An Economic and Political Analysis, Energy Economics, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 587-614.

Zhang, Z.X. (2003), Why Did the Energy Intensity Fall in China’s Industrial Sector in the 1990s?, The Relative Importance of Structural Change and Intensity Change, Energy Economics, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 625-638.

Zhang, Z.X. (2004), Open Trade with the U.S. without Compromising Canada’s Ability to Comply with its Kyoto Target, Journal of World Trade, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 155-182.

Zhang, Z.X. (2005), Sustainable Energy Development in China: Challenges Ahead to 2020, The Keynote Address at the International Conference on Staying Ahead of the Energy Scenarios, Bangkok, November 11.

Zhang, Z.X. (2007a), Why Has China not Embraced a Global Cap-and-Trade Regime?, Climate Policy, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 166-170.

Zhang, Z.X. (2007b), Greening China: Can Hu and Wen Turn a Test of their Leadership into a Legacy?, Presented at the Plenary Session on Sustainable Development at the first-ever Harvard College China-India Development and Relations Symposium, New York City, March 30 – April 2.

Zhang, Z.X. (2007c), Energy and Environmental Policy in Mainland China, The Keynote Address at the Cross-Straits Conference on Energy Economics and Policy, Organized by the Chinese Association for Energy Economics, Taipei, November 7-8.

Zhang, Z.X. (2009a), Encouraging Developing Country Involvement in a Post-2012 Climate Change Regime: Carrots, Sticks or Both?, in Trade and Climate Policies in a Post-2012 World, United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 79-85.

Zhang, Z.X. (2009b), Is It Fair to Treat China as a Christmas Tree to Hang Everybody’s Complaints? Putting its Own Energy Saving into Perspective, Energy Economics, doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2009.03.012.

Zhang, Z.X. (2009c), Multilateral Trade Measures in a Post-2012 Climate Change Regime?: What Can Be Taken from the Montreal Protocol and the WTO?, Energy Policy, Vol. 37, pp. pp. 5105-5112.

Zhang, Z.X. (2009d), The U.S. Proposed Carbon Tariffs, WTO Scrutiny and China’s Responses, International Economics and Economic Policy, forthcoming, Available at: http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/stored/pdfs//econwp106.pdf.