Lombardo, Vincenzo (2009): Growth and inequality effects on poverty reduction in Italy.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_21232.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper evaluates poverty sensitivity to growth in mean incomes and distributional changes in Italy across its regions and over a period spanning from 1977 to 2004. We use the “Survey on Household Income and Wealth” (SHIW) of the Bank of Italy to estimate the growth incidence curves and the income and inequality elasticities of poverty. Growth strongly determines the patterns of poverty; however, inequality appears to have strikingly characterized it as well. A 1% increase in mean income produces a reduction in the headcount index by around 2.8%, while a 1% increase in inequality increases it by around 2.2%. The heterogeneity in poverty rates between North, Centre and South may be due to the strong heterogeneity in the poverty elasticities, which in turn depend on the initial conditions of inequality and the initial level of development.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Growth and inequality effects on poverty reduction in Italy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Pro-poor growth, distribution, poverty |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty |
Item ID: | 21232 |
Depositing User: | Vincenzo Lombardo |
Date Deposited: | 24 Mar 2010 06:04 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 04:43 |
References: | Adams, R. H. J. (2004): “Economic Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Estimating the Growth Elasticity of Poverty,” World Development, 32, 1989–2014. Aitchison, J. and J. A. C. Brown (1957): The Lognormal Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Araar, A., J.-Y. Duclos, M. Audet, and P. Makdissi (2009): “Testing for pro-poorness of growth, with an application to Mexico,” Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 853–881. Atkinson, A. B. (1998): Poverty in Europe, Oxford:Blackwell. Atkinson, A. B. and F. Bourguignon (2000): Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. 1, New York and Oxford: Elsevier Science, North-Holland, 1 ed. Atkinson, A. B. and A. Brandolini (2001): “Promise and pitfalls in the use of "secondary" data-sets: income inequality in OECD countries,” Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 771–799. Baum, C. F., M. E. Schaffer, and S. Stillman (2003): “Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing,” Stata Journal, 1, 1–31. Besley, T. and R. Burgess (2003): “Halving Global Poverty,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 3–22. Besley, T. and L. J. Cord (2007): Delivering on the promise of pro-poor growth: Insights and lessons from country experiences, Washington, DC and New York: Palgrave MacMillan and The World Bank. Biewen, M. and S. P. Jenkins (2006): “Variance Estimation for Generalized Entropy and Atkinson Inequality Indices: the Complex Survey Data Case,” 68, 371–283. Boeri, T. and A. Brandolini (2004): “The age of discontent: italian households at the beginning of the decade,” 63, 449–487. Bourguignon, F. (2003): “The growth elasticity of poverty reduction: explaining heterogeneity across countries and time periods,” in Inequality and Growth: Theory and Policy Implications, ed. by T. S. Eicher and S. J. Turnovsky, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, chap. 1, 3–27. Brandolini, A. (2005): “La disuguaglianza di reddito in Italia nell’ultimo decennio,” Stato e Mercato, 74, 207–229. Cannari, L. and G. D’Alessio (2003): “La distribuzione del reddito e della ricchezza nelle regioni italiane,” Bank of Italy Economic Research Paper No. 482. Chen, S. and M. Ravallion (2003): “Measuring pro-poor growth,” Economics Letters, 78, 93–99. Cowell, F. A., F. H. Ferreira, and J. A. Litchfield (1998): “Income distribution in Brazil 1981-1990 parametric and non-parametric approaches,” Journal of Income Distribution, 8, 63–76. Datt, G. and M. Ravallion (1992): “Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures - A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s,” Journal of Development Economics, 38, 275–295. Deaton, A. (1997): The Analysis of Household Surveys: a Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, Washington D.C. and Baltimore: The World Bank and Johns Hopkins University Press. ——— (2005): “Measuring poverty in a growing world (or measuring growth in a poor world),” 87, 1–19. Dollar, D. and A. Kraay (2002): “Growth Is Good for the Poor,” Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 195–225. Duclos, J.-Y. (2009): “What is "Pro-Poor"?” Social Choice and Welfare, 32, 37–58. Eastwood, R. and M. Lipton (2000): “Pro-poor Growth and Pro-growth Poverty Reduction: Meaning, Evidence, and Policy Implications,” Asian Development Review, 18, 22–58. Elbers, C., J. O. Lanjouw, and P. Lanjouw (2003): “Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality,” Econometrica, 71, 355–364. Epaulard, A. (2003): “Macroeconomic Performance and Poverty Reduction,” IMF Working Paper No. 72. Essama-Nssah, B. and P. J. Lambert (2009): “Measuring pro-poorness: a unifying approach with new results,” Review of Income and Wealth, 55, 752–778. Foster, J. E., J. Greer, and E. Thorbecke (1984): “"A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures",” Econometrica, 52, 761–64. Galor, O. (2010): “The 2008 Lawrence R. Klein Lecture - Comparative Economic Development: Insights from Unified Growth Theory,” International Economic Review, 51, 1–44. Galor, O. and D. N. Weil (2000): “Population, Technology, and Growth: From Malthusian Stagnation to the Demographic Transition and beyond,” The American Economic Review, 90, 806–828. Ghosh, M. and J. N. K. Rao (1994): “Small Area Estimation: An Appraisal,” Statistical Science, 9, 55–93. Heltberg, R. (2002): “The Poverty Elasticity of Growth,” WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2002/21. Jappelli, T. and L. Pistaferri (2000): “The Dynamics of Household Wealth Accumulation in Italy,” Fiscal Studies, 21, 269–295. Jenkins, S. P. and P. Van Kerm (2006): “Trends in Income Inequality, Pro-Poor Income Growth and Income Mobility,” Oxford Economic Papers, 58, 531–548. Kakwani, N. (1993): “Poverty and Economic Growth with Application to Cote D’Ivoire,” Review of Income and Wealth, 39, 121–139. Kakwani, N. and E. M. Pernia (2000): “What is Pro-poor Growth?” Asian Development Review, 18, 1–16. Kalwij, A. and A. Verschoor (2007): “Not by growth alone: The role of the distribution of income in regional diversity in poverty reduction,” European Economic Review, 51, 805–829. Klasen, S. (2008): “Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction: Measurement Issues using Income and Non-Income Indicators,” World Development, 36, 420–445. Kraay, A. (2006): “When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries,” Journal of Development Economics, 80, 198–227. Lopez, J. H. and L. Servén (2006): “A Normal Relationship? Poverty, Growth, and Inequality,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3814. Massari, R., M. G. Pittau, and R. Zelli (2009): “A dwindling middle class? Italian evidence in the 2000s,” Journal of Economic Inequality, 7, 333–350. Pagan, A. and A. Ullah (1999): Nonparametric econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Paiella, M. (2007): “Does wealth affect consumption? Evidence for Italy,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 29, 189–205. Quah, D. T. (2003): “One third of the world’s growth and inequality,” in Inequality and Growth: Theory and Policy Implications, ed. by T. S. Eicher and S. J. Turnovsky, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, CESifo Seminar, chap. 2, 27–58. Ravallion, M. (1997): “Can high-inequality developing countries escape absolute poverty?” Economics Letters, 56, 51–57. ——— (2001): “Growth, inequality and poverty: looking beyond averages,” World Development, 29, 1803–1815. ——— (2005): “A poverty-inequality trade off?” Journal of Economic Inequality, 3, 169–181. Ravallion, M. and S. Chen (1997): “What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?” The World Bank Economic Review, 11, 357–382. Ravallion, M. and G. Datt (2002): “Why has economic growth been more pro-poor in some states of India than others?” Journal of Development Economics, 68, 381–400. Sala-I-Martin, X. (2006): “The world distribution of income: falling poverty and . . . convergence, period,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 351–397. Son, H. H. (2004): “A note on pro-poor growth,” Economics Letters, 82, 307–314. Tarozzi, A. and A. Deaton (2009): “Using census and survey data to estimate poverty and inequality for small areas,” 91, 773–792. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002): Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. World Bank (2005): World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development, Washington, DC, and Oxford: The World Bank and Oxford University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/21232 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Growth and inequality effects on poverty reduction in Italy. (deposited 30 Mar 2009 15:14)
- Growth and inequality effects on poverty reduction in Italy. (deposited 24 Mar 2010 06:04) [Currently Displayed]