Chandra, Abhijeet (2009): Stock Market Anomalies: A Calender Effect in BSE-Sensex.
Download (64kB) | Preview
Whether inexplicable patterns of abnormal stock market returns are detected in empirical studies of the stock market, a return anomaly is said to be found. There are other similar anomalies existing in the stock market. Economically meaningful stock market anomalies not only are statistically significant but also offer meaningful risk adjusted economic rewards to investors. Statistically significant stock market anomalies have yet-unknown economic and/or psychological explanations. A joint test problem exists because anomalies evidence that is inconsistent with a perfectly efficient market could be an indication of either market inefficiency or a simple failure of Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) accuracy. Some of the most-discussed about market anomalies are return anomaly, market capitalization effect, value effect, calendar effect, and announcement effect. Though various studies have been conducted to find out the presence of these anomalies across the stock markets worldwide, very few studies with reference to Indian stock market are available in the financial literature. This study aims to find the evidence of one of the anomalies, calendar effect in BSE Sensex, India’s leading stock exchange.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Stock Market Anomalies: A Calender Effect in BSE-Sensex|
|English Title:||Stock Market Anomalies: A Calender Effect in BSE-Sensex|
|Keywords:||Anomalies; Calender Effecr; Indian Stock Market; SENSEX|
|Subjects:||G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O16 - Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance
|Depositing User:||Abhijeet Chandra|
|Date Deposited:||13. Mar 2010 10:36|
|Last Modified:||30. Dec 2015 15:13|
1) Agarwal, A., K. Tandon (1994), “Anomalies or Illusions? Evidence from Stock Markets in Eighteen Countries”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 13(1), 83-106.
2) Ariel, R.A. (1987), “A Monthly Effect in Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, 18, 161-174.
3) Buchanan, John (1995), “The Efficient Market Hypothesis – A Discussion of Institutional Agency and Behavioural Issues”, Australian Journal of Management, 20, 2.
4) Cadsby, C. B., V. Torbey (2003), “Time-of-month anomaly: Reality or Mirage?”, Applied Economic Letters, 10(1), 741-745.
5) Cooper, Michael, John McConnell, and Alexei Ovtchinnikov (2006), “The Other January Effect”, Journal of Financial Economics, 82(2), 315-341.
6) Hensel, R., M. Ratner (1992), “Investment Results from Exploiting TOM Effects”, Journal of Portfolio Management, 22(3), 17-23.
7) Kohers, T., J.B. Patel (1999), “A New Time of the Month Anomaly in Stock Index Returns”, Applied Economic Letters, 6(2), 115-120.
8) Lakonishok. J., S. Smidt (1998), “Are Seasonal Anomalies Real? A Ninety Years Perspective”, Review of Financial Studies, 1(4), 403-425.