Vedia Jerez, Daniel Hernan (2007): De riesgo y pánico: una analítica de volatilidad y crecimiento 1960-2006.
Download (390kB) | Preview
It has long been believed that commodity price variability causes problems for primary producing and dependent countries. This paper tests the effects of price uncertainty (volatility) on economic growth. The model is constructed using a yearly panel data for the ten biggest countries in South America. The results show that output per worker varies enormously across countries, even within the region. Our analysis shows that exogenous shocks continue having a significant negative effect on growth on developing countries. Despite volatility series are not constant through time, we found a homogenous negative effect within the region, but it is heterogeneous when we apply a causality test. The effect is commonly observed in economic time series and it shows that growth rates are significantly reduced by large discrete negative commodity price shocks. Our analysis documented that the impact on productivity (output per worker) is driven through capital formation and foreign investment, as well as, by differences in what we call ‘social infrastructure’ (i.e. institutions and government policies).
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||De riesgo y pánico: una analítica de volatilidad y crecimiento 1960-2006|
|English Title:||About risk and panic, an overview of volatility and growth 1960-2006|
|Keywords:||Volatility, terms of trade, Latin America|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O54 - Latin America ; Caribbean
F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies
|Depositing User:||Daniel Hernan Vedia Jerez|
|Date Deposited:||24. Mar 2010 08:27|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 21:15|
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J., (2000). “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and University of California Berkeley.
Berden, Koen, (2006). “On Technology, Uncertainty and Economic Growth”, PhD Thesis Dissertation, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, pp. 9-77.
Blattman, C., Hwang, J. & Williamson, J., (2007). “Winners and losers in the commodity lottery: The impact of terms of trade growth and volatility in the Periphery 1870-1939”, Journal of Development Economics 82.
Dehn, Jan, (2000). “Commodity Price Uncertainty and Shocks: Implications for Economic Growth”, WPS/2000-10; Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
Krueger, A., & Sonnenschein, H., (1967). “The Terms of Trade, the Gains from Trade and Price Divergence”, International Economic Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 121-127.
Pain, Nigel, (2000). “Openness, Growth and development: trade and investment issues for developing economics”, National Institute of economic and social research.
Razin, A., Sadka, E., & Coury, T., (2002). “Trade Openness, Investment Instability and Terms-of-Trade Volatility”, NBER Working Paper No. 9332.
Rivera-Batiz, Luis A. & Romer, Paul M., (1992). "International Trade with Endogenous Technological Change," NBER Working Papers 3594, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Rodríguez, F. & Rodrik, D., (2000). “Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.
Romer, Paul, 1994. "New goods, old theory, and the welfare costs of trade restrictions," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 5-38.