Filippetti, Andrea and Peyrache, Antonio (2010): The Dynamic of Technological Capabilities of Countries: A Dual Approach Using Composite Indicators & Data Envelopment Analysis.
Download (318kB) | Preview
One of the main characteristics of the technological capabilities of countries has always been their uneven distribution across the countries. This paper explores the dynamic of technological capabilities for a sample of 42 countries over the period 1995-2007 introducing some methodological novelties. The results suggest that a process of convergence of technological capabilities has occurred to some extent. However, this has not been complete as some countries are still unable to reach a balanced growth in the different components of technological capabilities. We conclude by arguing that the production of technology can no longer be considered a privilege of a few advanced countries. This is going to bear consequences in the global arena in terms of trade, international division of labour and technological specialization
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Dynamic of Technological Capabilities of Countries: A Dual Approach Using Composite Indicators & Data Envelopment Analysis|
|Keywords:||technological capabilities, globalization of technology, composite indicators, data development analysis, 42 cross-country comparisons, large emerging countries|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights
|Depositing User:||Andrea Filippetti|
|Date Deposited:||25. Mar 2010 23:39|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 14:42|
Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385-406.
Abramovitz, M. (1989). Thinking about growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archibugi, D. & Coco, A. (2004). A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Development, 32(4), 629-54.
Archibugi, D. & Iammarino, S. (2002). The globalization of technological innovation: Definition and evidence. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 98-122.
Archibugi, D. & Pietrobelli, C. (2003). The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries. Windows of opportunity or further burden? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(9), 861-84.
Azariadis, C. & Drazen, A. (1990). Threshold externalities in economic development Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(2), 501-26.
Bell, M. & Pavitt, K. (1997) Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. In Archibugi, D. & Michie, J. (Eds.), Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castellacci, F. (2008). Technology clubs, technology gaps and growth trajectories. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19(4), 301–14.
Castellacci, F. & Archibugi, D. (2008). The technology clubs: The distribution of knowledge across nations. Research Policy, 37(10), 1659-1673.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture vol 1. The information age Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.
Cerulli, G. & Filippetti, A. (2010). The usefulness of STI composite indicators: an empirical application to 42 countries. Paper presented at the ENID Conference, March 2010, Paris.
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W. & van Puyenbroeck, T. (2005). Legitimately diverse, yet comparable: On synthetising social inclusion performance in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(5), 429-44.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-52.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R. & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why us manufacturing firms patent (or not). ?BER Working Paper
Fagerberg, J. (1994). Technology and international differences in growth rates. Journal of Economic Literature, 32(3), 1147-75. 25
Fagerberg, J. & Godinho, M. M. (2005) Innovation and catching-up. In Fagerberg, J., et al. (Eds.), Innovation and catching-up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M. & Knell, M. (2007). The competitiveness of nations: Why some countries proper while others fall behind. World Development, 35(10), 1595-620.
Fagerberg, J. & Verspagen, B. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: An evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1291-304.
Fare, R. & Primont, D. (1995). Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Figueiredoa, P. N. (2008). Industrial policy changes and firm-level technological capability development: Evidence from northern brazil. World Development, 36(1), 55-88.
Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press.
Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-707.
Grupp, H. & Mogee, M. E. (2004). Indicators for national science and technology policy: How robust are composite indicators? Research Policy, 33(1373-84.
Grupp, H. & Schubert, T. (2010). Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance. Research Policy, 39(1), 67-78.
Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences. Econometrics, 15(4), 59-81.
Iammarino, S., Padilla-Pérez, R. & von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Technological capabilities and global–local interactions: The electronics industry in two Mexican regions. World Development, 36(10), 1980-2003.
Kline, S. J. & Rosenberg, N. (1986) An overview of innovation. In Landau, R. & Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), An overview of innovation. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165-86.
Lovell C.A.K., Pastor J.T. (1995). Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations Reserach Letteres, 18, 147-151.
Maddison, A. (1991). Dynamic forces in capitalist development Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miles, I. (2005) Innovation in services. In Fagerberg, J., et al. (Eds.), Innovation in services. Oxford Oxford University Press.
Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena. Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 26
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A. & Giovannini, E. (2005) Handbook on costructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, OECD Statistics Working Paper 2005/3.
OECD (2008) Compendium of patent statistics, OECD.
OECD (2007) Science, technology and innovation indicators in a changing world. Paris: Oecd
OECD (2005) Growth in service. Fostering employment, productivity and innovation, Oecd.
OECD (2004) Triadic patent families methodology. Paris: Oecd
OECD (2003) The sources of growth in Oecd countries. Paris: Oecd
OECD (2002). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed standard practice for survey of research and experimental development: Frascati manual. Paris: Oecd
Patel, P. & Pavitt, K. (1994). Uneven (and divergent) technological accumulation among advanced countries: Evidence and a framework of explanation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), 759- 87.
Perez, C. & Soete, L. (1996) Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunities. In Shin, J. S. (Eds.), Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunities. London: Routledge.
Pianta, M. (1995). Technology and growth in Oecd countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 175–88.
Porter, A., Newman, N. C., Roessner, D., Johnson, D. M. & Jin, X.-Y. (2009). International high tech competitiveness: Does china rank number 1? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(2), 173-93.
Rifkin, J. (2000). The age of access: The new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paidfor experience. London: Penguin.
Roessner, J.D., Porter, A.L., Newman, N., Cauffiel, D. (1996). Anticipating the future high-tech competitiveness of nations: indicators for twenty-eight countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 51(2), 133–149.
Schmookler, J. (1962). Economic sources of inventive activity. Journal of Economic History, March(1)-20.
Tassey, G. (2008). Globalization of technology-based growth: The policy imperative. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 560-78.
UNCTAD (2006). World Investment Report 2006. FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. New York, Unctad.
UNCTAD (2005). World Investment Report 2005. Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. New York, Unctad. 27
Verspagen, B. (2005) Innovation and economic growth. In Fagerberg, J., et al. (Eds.), Innovation and economic growth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
World Bank (1998) World development report. Knowledge for development, The World Bank.