Khalidi, Raja J. and Taghdisi-Rad, Sahar (2009): The economic dimensions of prolonged occupation: continuity and change in Israeli policy towards the Palestinian economy. Published in: UNCTAD No. UNCTAD/GDS/2009/2 (August 2009)
Download (157kB) | Preview
- There is no Israeli economic policy towards the Palestinian people or the occupied territory; rather there is a policy to maintain occupation and administration of the Palestinian territory by whatever means available, including economic strategies;
- Israeli strategies deployed since 1967 have included economic inducements to improve the quality of life, devolution, and other schemes focused on promoting individual welfare but not preventing communal poverty;
- The Oslo Accords and the Paris Protocol on Economic Relations (PER) of 1994 formalized the de facto customs union in operation under occupation and locked in the adverse path of dependence of the Palestinian economy upon Israel;
- Palestinian Authority institutions have been unable to establish sovereign or even autonomous institutions capable of expanding the space for economic policymaking and for economic polices promoting long-term development;
- The effects of Israel’s dual strategy of skewed economic integration coupled with physical separation has led, over forty years, to divergence in per capita incomes between Israel and the territory, rather than the convergence promised by economic theory and the premises of the customs union;
- Instead of continuing to repeatedly reform the facades of interim self-government, all efforts should aim to form the sovereign institutions for statehood;
- New Israeli overtures under the heading of “economic peace” risk not only diverting attention from political processes, but also hark back to an era of Israeli domination of the Palestinian economy, which demonstrably failed;
- Though the PER may have outlived its design and usefulness, it can only be superseded if a fundamentally different framework is envisaged, rooted in ensuring Palestinian sovereignty, statehood and economic viability;
- A Palestinian economic strategy for sovereignty and peace would entail seeking recognition of the Palestinian economy as a separate customs territory, and would become the reference point for formulation of economic policy, institution-building, decision-making, and international economic relations;
- Such a status would offer a platform for building a viable, vibrant and secure national economy for the envisioned State of Palestine, governed by a framework which adheres, among other principles, to the multilateral rules and disciplines embodied in the World Trade Organization;
- Only through a Palestinian economic policy framework that is predicated on the separate, internationally recognized status of the economy of the occupied territory, which in turn helps to create the conditions to end occupation, can a viable Palestinian economy and a sovereign State emerge to deliver the promise of peace.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The economic dimensions of prolonged occupation: continuity and change in Israeli policy towards the Palestinian economy|
|Keywords:||Palestinian economy, occupied Palestinian territories|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy
P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy
|Depositing User:||Raja J. Khalidi|
|Date Deposited:||07. Apr 2010 05:13|
|Last Modified:||21. Apr 2015 14:10|
Arnon A (ed.) (1997). The Palestinian Economy: Between Imposed Integration and Voluntary Separation. New York. Brill.
De Melo J, Grether J-M and Winters A (2003). Options for a Tariff Policy for Palestine. London School of Economics and Political Science.
IMF and World Bank (2007). West Bank and Gaza Economic Development in 2006 – A First Assessment. Washington D.C.; March.
Khan M (2004). State Formation in Palestine: Viability and Governance During a Social Transformation. London. Routledge.
Le More A (2008). International Assistance to the Palestinians after Oslo: Political Guilt, Wasted Money. London and New York. Routledge.
Palestinian Authority, Ministry of Planning (2004). Medium-term Development Plan 2005–2007.
Salem G (2006). Regionalism and Multilateralism: The Case of the Occupied Palestinian Territory. World Trade Institute.
Abed G, ed. The Palestinian Economy: Studies in Development under Prolonged Occupation. London. Routledge.
Taghdisi-Rad S (2009). Aid and Trade in Palestine. London and New York. Routledge.
UNCTAD (1986). Recent economic developments in the occupied Palestinian territories. UNCTAD/TD/B/1102.
UNCTAD (1988). Recent economic developments in the occupied Palestinian territories, with special reference to the external trade sector. UNCTAD/TD/B/1183.
UNCTAD (1989). Recent economic developments in the occupied Palestinian territory. UNCTAD/TD/B/1221.
UNCTAD (1991). Recent economic developments in the occupied Palestinian territory. UNCTAD/TD/B/1305.
UNCTAD (1992). Report of the Secretary-General on assistance to the Palestinian people in the light of the Cartagena Decision. UNCTAD/TD/B/39(1)/4.
UNCTAD (1993). Developments in the economy of the occupied Palestinian territory. UNCTAD/TD/B/40(1)/8.
UNCTAD (1998). The Palestinian Economy and Prospects for Regional Cooperation. UNCTAD/GDS/SEU/2.
UNCTAD (2006). The Palestinian War-Torn Economy: Aid, Development and State Formation. UNCTAD/GDS/APP/2006/1.
UNCTAD (2008). Accra Accord. United Nations publication. UNCTAD/IAOS/2008/2. New York and Geneva.
UNCTAD (forthcoming). Report on UNCTAD Assistance to the Palestinian People. UNCTAD/GDS/APPU/2009/1.