Agricultural holdings: hindsight and foresight

Laurent, Catherine and Rémy, Jacques (1998): Agricultural holdings: hindsight and foresight. Published in: Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Developpement No. 31 (1998): pp. 415-430.

Abstract

In France, the concept of the agricultural holding is a result of a lengthy social construction in which the stages in classification and statistical work have proceeded in tune with the major political struggles and social debates of the 19th and 20th centuries. Some people argue that the “ agricultural holding ” is now just a term revived from the past for the modern “ agricultural enterprise ”. Sociologists and economists therefore need to reconsider the significance and relevance of this concept. The diversity of the ways of practising agricultural activities encountered in French households shows that the economic and social realities referred to in this concept are far too varied for its use in defining a productive sector having an institutional existence. Neither can it be used to demark the social groups that will be entitled to benefit from the support measures of agricul-tural and rural development policies. As a basic statistical unit, however the concept of the agricultural holding can provide a com-mon basic unit for measuring agricultural activity, and the land used for this activity, thereby permitting the integration of results concerning the different functions of agricultural activity (production, natural resource management, land use, socio-economic cohesion, etc.). From this angle, the statistical notion of the agricultural holding as presently defined is of increasing interest for the management of new agricultural and rural policies and for social sciences research.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Knowledge, agricultural statistics,agricultural holding,history of concepts, multifunctionality
• Subjects: N - Economic History > N5 - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment, and Extractive Industries > N50 - General, International, or Comparative; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B49 - Other; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development

References

Agulhon M., Désert G., Specklin R., 1976. Apogée et crise de la civilisation paysanne. Tomes 3 de Histoire de la France Rurale, Duby G. & Wallon A. Dir. Seuil. 568 p.

Alfroy A., 1979. La statistique agricole fran-çaise. Collection de statistique agricole, Études, 140, Paris, SCEES.

Barcelo R., 1982. L’attribution préférentielle et la transmission héréditaire de l’exploitation agricole, Revue de droit rural, pp. 291-305

Barthélémy D., 1988. La naissance de l’entreprise agricole. Paris, Economica.

Barthez A., 1986. Du labeur paysan au métier d’agriculteur : l’élaboration statis-tique en agriculture. Cahiers d’économie et sociologie rurales (3), 1986, pp. 46-72.

Bellon S., Cartier S., Fabre C., Laurent C., Mundler P., Perrier L., Ponchelet D., Rémy J., 1995. Nouvelles formes d’exercice de l’activité agricole. Rapport d’étape pour l’AIP Nouvelles fonctions de l’agriculture et de l’espace rural, INRA, 192 p.

Bertin J., 1977. La graphique et le traite-ment de l’information. Flammarion, Paris; 277 p.

Blanc M., Brun A., Delord B., Lacombe P., 1990. L’agriculture française est-elle encore familiale ? in: P. Coulomb, H. Delorme, B. Hervieu, M. Jollivet et P. Lacombe. Les agri-culteurs et la politique. Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, pp. 310-327.

Bowler I.R., Bryant C.R., Nellis M.D., 1991. Contemporary rural systems in transi-tion. 2. Vol. Cab International. CE, Commission Européenne. 1996a. Dé-claration de Cork, un milieu vivant. Con-férence européenne sur le développement rural, “ L’Europe rurale, des perspectives pour l’avenir ”. Cork 7-9 novembre 1996. 6 p. + 5 p. annexes.

CE, Commission Européenne. 1996b. Pre-mier rapport sur la cohésion économique et sociale. Luxembourg 158 p.

CEC, 1988. The future of rural society, Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council. Bulletin of the European Communities. Supplement 4/88. Luxem-bourg, 67 p.

CEC, 1991. The development and future of the Common Agricultural Policy. Bulletin of the European Communities. Supplement 5/91. Luxembourg, 45 p

CEC, Commission of the European Commu-nities, 1988. Farm Accountancy Data Net-work - Handbook of Legislation. Instruction and Notes for Guidance, Brussels - Luxem-bourg.

ECC, 1989. Official Journal of the European Communities. º L391, dated 30 Dec 1989

Eurostat, 1997. Income of agricultural households sector. Eurostat, 1986. Farm Structure: methodol-ogy of the Community surveys.

Gilardeau J.M., Moreau J.P., 1990. Code rural, commenté et annoté, Paris, ITEC.

Hill B., 1994. Revenu global des ménages agricoles : progrès réalisés en 1993. Euro-stat. 54 p.

Hill B., 1998. Surveys for Farm Structure, Agricultural Accounts and Total Income of Agricultural Households. Conference Agri-cultural Statistics 2000. Washington. 17-20 March 1998. 13 p.

Kayser B., (Dir.), 1993, Naissance de nou-velles campagnes. DATAR/Éditions de l’Aube, 174 p.

Kayser B., Brun A., Cavailhès J., Lacombe P., 1994. Pour une ruralité choisie. DATAR/Éditions de l’Aube, 131 p.

Larson O., Narain P., 1998. International Standards and Definitions for Agricultural Statistics and Requirements for World Cen-sus in Agriculture. Conference Agricultural Statistics 2000. Washington. 17-20 March 1998. 11 p.

Laurent C., Bowler I., (Ed.) 1997. CAP and the Regions. Building a Multidisciplinary framework for the Analysis of the EU Agri-cultural Space. INRA. Sciences up-date. 228 p.

Laurent C., Cartier S., Fabre C., Mundler P., Ponchelet D., Rémy J., 1998. L’activité agricole des ménages ruraux et la cohésion économique et sociale. Économie Rurale n° 224, pp. 12-21.

Lazarfeld P. F., 1937. Some remarks on the typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung 6

Le Pensec L., 1998. Projet de loi d’orientation agricole, Assemblée Nationale. Enregistré le 10 Juin 1998. 66 p.

MacKinnon N., Bryden J.M., Bell C., Fuller A.M., Spearman M., 1991. Pluriactiv-ity, structural change and farm house vulnerability in Western Europe. Sociologia Ruralis. vol. XXXI-1, pp. 58-71.

OCDE, 1993, Revenu des ménages agricoles, flexibilité du travail et ajustement struc-turel : examen de la situation du point de vue du revenu des ménages agricoles dans les pays membres de l’OCDE. 36 p.

OECD, 1995. A review of Households Income in OECD Countries.

Perrot C., Landais E., 1994. Research into typological Methods for farm Analysis. The why and wherefore. In Systems studies in agriculture and rural development, Brossier, de Bonneval, Landais Ed., INRA Science Update, pp. 373-381

Rémy J., 1987. La crise de professionnalisa-tion en agriculture : les enjeux de la lutte pour le contrôle du titre d’agriculteur. Sociologie du travail, 4 (87), pp. 415-441.

Rémy J., 1990. Qui est agriculteur ? in Coulomb, Delorme, Hervieu, Jollivet, Lacombe, Les agriculteurs et la politique, Paris, FNSP, pp. 257-265.

Revue de droit rural, 1997. L’entreprise agricole : fiction ou réalité ? n° 250.

Robson N., 1996. Practical and Legal Chal-lenges of developing Pluriactivity and Non-Farm Incomes Data Using the EU’s Farm Accountancy Data Network. In Hill B. Ed. Income, Statistics for the Agricultural House-holds Sector: Proceedings of the Eurostat International Seminar, Luxembourg.

SCEES, 1997. Les subventions d’exploitation. Les Cahiers Agreste, Spécial RICA. Études; pp. 15-17.

Tonarelli M., 1997. The contribution of FADN-RICA to AGRIREG. In “ CAP and the regions. Building a multidisciplinary frame-work for the analysis of the EU agricultural space ”. Laurent C. and Bowler I. Ed. INRA, Sciences Update, pp. 59-70.

Trant M., Whitridge P., 1998. Integration of Administrative Data with Survey and Census Data. Conference Agricultural Statistics 2000. Washington. 17-20 March 1998. 9 p.